AUDC vs EXTR vs SANG Stock Comparison

Audiocodes, Extreme Networks and Sangoma Technologies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AUDC Audiocodes Ltd
$11.47 +7.6% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$333.42M
P/E
47.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$249.25M
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
5 wins
EXTR Extreme Networks Inc
$22.70 +5.5% 1M +8.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.17B
P/E
75.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.28B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
5 wins
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.65 +31.0% 1M -11.3% 1Y
Market cap
$151.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Extreme Networks leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Extreme Networks 5, Audiocodes 5, Sangoma Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAUDCEXTRSANGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $333.42M $3.17B $151.26M EXTR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 47.2x 75.2x -1.9x AUDC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.9x 16.4x — EXTR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.5% +12.6% -14.2% EXTR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.8% 3.3% -39.0% EXTR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.1% 19.4% 54.0% SANG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.9x -0.6x 0.2x AUDC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.7% +8.7% -11.3% AUDC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.5%/yr +18.6%/yr -26.5%/yr EXTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.0% 55.5% 51.2% AUDC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 51/100 42/100 AUDC

Percentile Scorecard

AUDCEXTRSANG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAUDCEXTRSANG
Valuation 87 #15 of 111 37 #70 of 111 93 #3 of 29
Growth 17 #90 of 108 39 #66 of 108 0 #27 of 27
Profitability 69 #33 of 104 70 #32 of 104 48 #14 of 26
Financial Health 69 #36 of 115 23 #89 of 115 50 #16 of 31
Shareholder Returns 36 #52 of 81 88 #11 of 81 19 #14 of 17
Overall 56 51 42
  • AUDC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • EXTR ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SANG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAUDCEXTRSANGSPY
1 month +7.6%+5.5%+31.0% -0.8%
3 months +17.3%-24.2%+11.8% +3.5%
6 months +29.3%+30.0%+7.1% +7.0%
Year to date +31.4%+36.3%-8.3% +12.2%
1 year +26.7%+8.7%-11.3% +13.0%
3 years +59.5%+10.5%+63.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +16.9%+3.4%+17.7% +23.1%
5 years -66.2%+134.7%-78.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -19.5%+18.6%-26.5% +11.0%
10 years +115.2%+434.1%+121.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.0%+18.2%+8.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAUDCEXTRSANGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.0%55.5%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.1%56.6%42.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.141.540.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.640.16-0.22 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.0%-67.2%-89.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-32.7%-13.9% -1.8%
52-week high $11.47$33.71$5.40 $779.14
52-week low $7.03$13.74$3.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAUDCEXTRSANG
P/E now vs peer median 46.3xmedian 32.0x 71.5xmedian 32.0x -2.0xmedian 31.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.8x 2.3xmedian 2.8x 0.8xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 19.4x 34.0xmedian 19.4x 1.7xmedian 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 29.0x 31.3xmedian 29.0x 7.1xmedian 14.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.9x 33.6xmedian 2.9x 0.9xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median -2.74median 1.13 -3.79median 1.13 0.05median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAUDCEXTRSANG
Revenue $249.25M $1.28B $203.08M
Gross profit $163.86M $789.14M $143.68M
Operating income $14.36M $62.70M $66.76M
Net income $7.06M $42.12M -$81.09M
Free cash flow $32.61M $95.24M $21.92M
R&D $54.05M $233.88M $42.90M
EPS (diluted) $0.24 $0.31 $-2.38
Cash & equivalents $51.41M $211.76M $10.43M
Total debt $27.00M $163.72M $89.10M
Shares (diluted) 28.98M 134.97M 33.24M
Enterprise value $60.29M $2.31B $92.77M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAUDCEXTRSANG
P/E 46.3x 71.5x -2.0x
P/FCF 9.5x 31.3x 7.1x
P/Operating cash flow 11.5x 24.2x 6.5x
P/S 1.2x 2.3x 0.8x
P/B 2.1x 33.6x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 2.9x 34.8x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 13.6x 34.0x 1.7x
EV/EBIT 17.9x 46.7x 2.6x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 2.3x 0.8x
EV/FCF 7.9x 30.8x 7.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.5x 23.8x 7.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.74 -3.79 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAUDCEXTRSANG
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.5% 12.6% -14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.3% -0.7% -7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.5% 11.3% -11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.2% 1.5% -6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.7% 269.9% -18.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -5.0% -16.7% -18.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -48.7% 664.1% -1,519%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -20.0% -18.6% -40.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -45.8% 653.0% -1,493%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -16.9% -18.9% -39.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -38.9% -19.0% -43.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 50.4% -20.9% -9.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -42.4% -25.2% -50.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.0% -26.0% -8.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAUDCEXTRSANG
Gross margin 65.7% 61.5% 70.7%
EBITDA margin 7.6% 6.7% 50.3%
Operating margin 5.8% 4.9% 32.9%
Pretax margin 4.5% 4.0% -41.7%
Net margin 2.8% 3.3% -39.0%
FCF margin 13.1% 7.4% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin 10.9% 9.6% 11.7%
Return on equity 10.3% 50.3% -87.1%
Return on assets 5.0% 3.6% –
Return on invested capital 9.1% 19.4% 54.0%
Return on capital employed 6.5% 10.8% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.8x 2.9x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% 6.9% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAUDCEXTRSANG
Debt / assets 2.4% 13.9% 11.6%
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.8x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.9x -0.6x 0.2x
Debt / FCF 0.2x 1.7x 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 52.8% 92.5% 25.8%
Equity / assets 47.2% 7.5% 74.2%
Interest coverage – 4.5x 33.0x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.9x 0.8x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 1.78 1.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAUDCEXTRSANG
Dividend yield 3.5% – –
Net buyback yield -13.3% 2.9% -0.1%
Shareholder yield -9.8% 2.9% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAUDCEXTRSANG
Forward P/E 17.9xFY2026 16.4xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.64FY2026 $1.38FY2027 $-0.17FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +4.9%FY2026 +30.2%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +3.1% +2.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $265.51MFY2026 $1.34BFY2027 $192.47MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +8.1%FY2026 +4.5%FY2027 -3.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% +21.3% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAUDCEXTRSANG
Held by institutions 33.5% 96.7% –
Institutions holding 67 338 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.5% +1.2% –
Institutions buying 31 181 –
Institutions selling 20 121 –
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.50 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AUDCEXTRSANG
AUDC 1.00 0.24 0.10
EXTR 0.24 1.00 0.06
SANG 0.10 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AUDC, EXTR and SANG?

Extreme Networks (EXTR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Audiocodes (AUDC) $333.42M, Extreme Networks (EXTR) $3.17B, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $151.26M.

Which stock is cheaper, AUDC, EXTR and SANG?

Audiocodes (AUDC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Audiocodes (AUDC) 47.2x, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 75.2x, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -1.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Extreme Networks (EXTR) is cheapest (Audiocodes (AUDC) 17.9x, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 16.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Extreme Networks (EXTR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Audiocodes (AUDC) +2.5%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) +12.6%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Extreme Networks (EXTR) has the highest net margin (Audiocodes (AUDC) 2.8%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 3.3%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%). On return on invested capital, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) leads (Audiocodes (AUDC) 9.1%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 19.4%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 54.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Audiocodes (AUDC) returned the most: Audiocodes (AUDC) +26.7%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) +8.7%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -11.3%. Over five years, Extreme Networks (EXTR) compounded fastest (Audiocodes (AUDC) -19.5%/yr, Extreme Networks (EXTR) +18.6%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Audiocodes (AUDC) has been the steadiest (Audiocodes (AUDC) 42.0%, Extreme Networks (EXTR) 55.5%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AUDC, EXTR and SANG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Extreme Networks (EXTR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.