ATVK vs QS vs AMPX Stock Comparison

Globaltek Ventures, QuantumScape and Amprius Technologies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
QS QuantumScape Corp
$3.90 -20.6% 1M -76.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.60B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Energy Storage Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Amprius Technologies leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Amprius Technologies 4, QuantumScape 2, Globaltek Ventures 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATVKQSAMPXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.88M $2.60B $1.28B QS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.6x -6.8x -33.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -96.8% — +143.6% AMPX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -18,847.0% — -35.2% AMPX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -15.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -71.8% -76.8% -35.2% AMPX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.7%/yr -30.2%/yr — ATVK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 309.2% 70.0% 99.9% QS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 49/100 52/100 AMPX

Percentile Scorecard

ATVKQSAMPX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATVKQSAMPX
Valuation 52 #30 of 61 42 #36 of 61 43 #35 of 61
Growth 23 #45 of 58 44 #33 of 58 46 #32 of 58
Profitability 30 #39 of 55 35 #36 of 55 46 #30 of 55
Financial Health 34 #47 of 71 86 #11 of 71 91 #7 of 71
Shareholder Returns – 39 #18 of 29 32 #20 of 29
Overall 35 49 52
  • ATVK ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • QS ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • AMPX ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATVKQSAMPXSPY
1 month -62.9%-20.6%-14.4% -0.8%
3 months -21.9%-24.7%-13.8% +3.5%
6 months -45.4%-44.8%-61.0% +7.0%
Year to date -82.2%-62.6%+5.8% +12.2%
1 year -71.8%-76.8%-35.2% +13.0%
3 years +137.3%-26.1%+198.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +33.4%-9.6%+44.0% +23.1%
5 years -29.3%-83.4%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -6.7%-30.2%— +11.0%
10 years -97.9%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year -32.0%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureATVKQSAMPXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 309.2%70.0%99.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 443.0%72.7%106.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.403.033.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-1.10-0.35 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.5%-91.4%-94.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -84.8%-78.9%-63.6% -1.8%
52-week high $25.20$18.44$22.91 $779.14
52-week low $3.82$3.89$7.59 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATVKQSAMPX
P/E now vs peer median -6.6xmedian 25.4x -6.3xmedian 25.4x -31.2xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1,250xmedian 2.1x —median 2.1x 11.2xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -251.2xmedian 17.5x -4.4xmedian 17.5x -30.8xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.6xmedian 27.3x -9.4xmedian 27.3x -20.9xmedian 27.3x
P/B now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 1.7x 2.4xmedian 1.7x 9.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.77 -0.49median 0.77 -4.15median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATVKQSAMPX
Revenue $27.91K – $109.23M
Gross profit – – $24.31M
Operating income -$212.00K -$418.18M -$41.15M
Net income -$12.82M -$383.62M -$36.54M
Free cash flow $1.22M -$258.79M -$58.44M
R&D $2.00K $327.75M $13.16M
EPS (diluted) $-0.58 $-0.62 $-0.27
Cash & equivalents $26.88K $75.60M $74.52M
Total debt $7.56M – –
Shares (diluted) 9.13M 620.56M 143.47M
Enterprise value $34.83M -$957.26M $975.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATVKQSAMPX
P/E -6.6x -6.3x -31.2x
P/FCF 28.6x -9.4x -20.9x
P/Operating cash flow 28.6x -10.6x -23.1x
P/S 1,250x – 11.2x
P/B 7.3x 2.4x 9.7x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 2.4x 9.7x
EV/EBITDA -251.2x -4.4x -30.8x
EV/EBIT -175.2x -3.8x -27.8x
EV/Revenue 1,331x – 10.5x
EV/FCF 30.5x -6.2x -19.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 30.5x -7.0x -21.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 -0.49 -4.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATVKQSAMPX
Revenue growth (1Y) -96.8% – 143.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -72.0% – 203.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 390.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 65.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -138.6% 14.8% -4.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -21.1% 3.7% -10.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -280.2% 14.7% 3.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -680.4% 4.5% -8.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -7,667% 19.1% 14.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -998.9% 12.9% 7.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.2% 7.1% -55.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 74.6% 2.5% -37.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 42.2% 7.6% -75.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 80.6% 9.9% -33.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATVKQSAMPX
Gross margin – – 22.3%
EBITDA margin -529.7% – -34.1%
Operating margin -759.6% – -37.7%
Pretax margin -1,137% – -37.7%
Net margin -18,847% – -35.2%
FCF margin 4,369% – -53.5%
Operating cash flow margin 4,369% – -48.4%
Return on equity -246.1% -37.5% -35.0%
Return on assets -160.7% -33.5% -29.4%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -3.0% -38.3% -33.8%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 0.6x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 7.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATVKQSAMPX
Debt / assets 27.4% – –
Debt / equity 0.5x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -15.3x – –
Debt / FCF 1.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 42.4% 11.1% 15.8%
Equity / assets 57.6% 88.9% 84.2%
Interest coverage -2.0x -221.6x –
Current ratio 0.0x 16.1x 7.2x
Quick ratio 0.0x 15.8x 6.3x
Cash ratio 0.0x 15.8x 4.1x
Altman Z-score 5.77 – 29.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATVKQSAMPX
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -0.5% -2.2%
Shareholder yield – -0.5% -2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATVKQSAMPX
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.61FY2026 $-0.09FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $0.00FY2026 $150.37MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +106.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +50.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATVKQSAMPX
Held by institutions – 33.9% 67.4%
Institutions holding – 451 259
Change in shares held, QoQ – -10.0% +14.9%
Institutions buying – 258 173
Institutions selling – 90 63
Buyers to sellers – 2.87 2.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATVKQSAMPX
ATVK 1.00 -0.01 0.02
QS -0.01 1.00 0.63
AMPX 0.02 0.63 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATVK, QS and AMPX?

QuantumScape (QS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) $34.88M, QuantumScape (QS) $2.60B, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) $1.28B.

Which company is growing faster?

Amprius Technologies (AMPX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) -96.8%, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) +143.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amprius Technologies (AMPX) has the highest net margin (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) -18,847.0%, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) -35.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amprius Technologies (AMPX) returned the most: Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) -71.8%, QuantumScape (QS) -76.8%, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) -35.2%. Over five years, Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) compounded fastest (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) -6.7%/yr, QuantumScape (QS) -30.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, QuantumScape (QS) has been the steadiest (Globaltek Ventures (ATVK) 309.2%, QuantumScape (QS) 70.0%, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) 99.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATVK, QS and AMPX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amprius Technologies (AMPX) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.