ATS vs NGTF vs VHUB Stock Comparison

Ats, NightFood Holdings and VenHub Global Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ATS ATS Corp /ATS
$19.00 -0.5% 1M -30.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.87B
P/E
55.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Ats leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ats 4, NightFood Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATSNGTFVHUBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.87B $896.03M $22.27M ATS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 55.0x -10.6x -0.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.8% +1,462.5% — NGTF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% -1,039.0% -11,799.2% ATS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.5x -0.4x — NGTF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.0% +3,200.0% — NGTF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +75.3%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.9% 527.7% 162.6% ATS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 30/100 2/100 ATS

Percentile Scorecard

ATSNGTFVHUB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATSNGTFVHUB
Valuation 87 #28 of 203 58 #6 of 13 0 #13 of 13
Growth 79 #40 of 188 0 #12 of 12 9 #11 of 12
Profitability 43 #104 of 183 46 #7 of 12 0 #12 of 12
Financial Health 24 #165 of 217 17 #11 of 13 0 #13 of 13
Shareholder Returns 27 #112 of 153 – –
Overall 52 30 2
  • ATS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • NGTF ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • VHUB ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATSNGTFVHUBSPY
1 month -0.5%+10,900.0%-46.3% -0.2%
3 months -29.5%+10,900.0%-60.8% +3.9%
6 months -40.3%+10,900.0%-56.1% +8.2%
Year to date -31.0%+6,500.0%— +12.9%
1 year -30.0%+3,200.0%— +12.3%
3 years -45.0%+16,400.0%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -18.1%+449.1%— +23.3%
5 years —+1,550.0%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —+75.3%— +10.9%
10 years —+1,550.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+32.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureATSNGTFVHUBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.9%527.7%162.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.3%443.4%198.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.541.811.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.586.06— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.5%-95.5%-96.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.3%0.0%-96.4% -1.2%
52-week high $35.38$3.30$8.08 $779.14
52-week low $17.29$0.02$0.29 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATSNGTFVHUB
P/E now vs peer median 54.8xmedian 25.2x -10.6x -0.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.9x 110.0xmedian 18.7x 51.9xmedian 18.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 14.0x -12.6x -0.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 21.7x -104.6xmedian 14.5x -1.6xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.3x 76.0xmedian 1.1x -495.8xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median -1.71median 1.32 0.16 —

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATSNGTFVHUB
Revenue $2.12B $8.15M $505.29K
Gross profit $594.19M $5.34M -$111.65K
Operating income $119.42M -$77.62M -$42.78M
Net income $33.97M -$84.65M -$59.62M
Free cash flow $180.36M -$8.56M -$16.53M
R&D – – $1.05M
EPS (diluted) $0.35 $-0.31 $-0.69
Cash & equivalents $140.09M $865.89K $2.56M
Total debt $3.79B $136.49M –
Shares (diluted) 98.14M 271.53M 86.30M
Enterprise value $1.19B $892.75M $13.83M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATSNGTFVHUB
P/E 54.8x -10.6x -0.4x
P/FCF 10.3x -104.6x -1.6x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x -111.3x -1.7x
P/S 0.9x 110.0x 51.9x
P/B 1.5x 76.0x -495.8x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 153.7x -495.8x
EV/EBITDA 12.3x -12.6x -0.6x
EV/EBIT 21.7x -11.9x -0.6x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 113.5x 46.8x
EV/FCF 14.4x -107.9x -1.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x -114.8x -1.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.71 0.16 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATSNGTFVHUB
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.8% 1,463% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 293.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 4,708% -1,607% -193.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -12.6% -234.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) 228.1% -1,032% -76.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -30.6% -140.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 227.3% -398.7% 42.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.0% -65.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 32.1% -786.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 77.8% -88.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.0% -808.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 279.9% -92.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATSNGTFVHUB
Gross margin 28.0% 65.5% -22.1%
EBITDA margin 10.0% -901.7% -8,423%
Operating margin 5.6% -952.6% -8,466%
Pretax margin 2.4% -1,039% -10,867%
Net margin 1.6% -1,039% -11,799%
FCF margin 8.5% -105.1% -3,271%
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% -98.8% -3,074%
Return on equity 2.7% -179.3% -3,339%
Return on assets 1.1% -87.5% -559.7%
Return on invested capital 3.7% – –
Return on capital employed – -119.7% -1,898%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 6.0x 0.1x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 24.6% 6,401%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATSNGTFVHUB
Debt / assets 28.8% 45.3% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 2.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.5x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 4.8x -3.4x –
Liabilities / assets 57.9% 81.7% 100.7%
Equity / assets 42.1% 18.3% -0.7%
Interest coverage 1.7x -12.3x -3.5x
Current ratio – 0.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio – 0.0x 0.3x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 2.94 -34.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATSNGTFVHUB
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.3% 0.0% -72.0%
Shareholder yield 0.3% 0.0% -72.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATSNGTFVHUB
Forward P/E 18.4xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.03FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY -14.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +37.9% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.98BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -7.6%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +2.9% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATSNGTFVHUB
Held by institutions 83.4% – –
Institutions holding 143 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.9% – –
Institutions buying 82 – –
Institutions selling 46 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.78 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATSNGTFVHUB
ATS 1.00 0.03 0.01
NGTF 0.03 1.00 0.14
VHUB 0.01 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATS, NGTF and VHUB?

Ats (ATS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ats (ATS) $1.87B, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) $896.03M, VenHub Global (VHUB) $22.27M.

Which company is growing faster?

NightFood Holdings (NGTF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ats (ATS) +14.8%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +1,462.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ats (ATS) has the highest net margin (Ats (ATS) 1.6%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) -1,039.0%, VenHub Global (VHUB) -11,799.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NightFood Holdings (NGTF) returned the most: Ats (ATS) -30.0%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +3,200.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ats (ATS) has been the steadiest (Ats (ATS) 51.9%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) 527.7%, VenHub Global (VHUB) 162.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATS, NGTF and VHUB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ats (ATS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.