ATS vs NGTF vs OUST Stock Comparison

Ats, NightFood Holdings and Ouster Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ATS ATS Corp /ATS
$19.00 -0.5% 1M -30.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.86B
P/E
54.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins
OUST Ouster, Inc.
$32.79 -25.0% 1M -11.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.25B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$204.91M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

NightFood Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (NightFood Holdings 4, Ats 3, Ouster 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATSNGTFOUSTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.86B $896.03M $2.25B OUST
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 54.8x -10.6x -40.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.8% +1,462.5% +62.8% NGTF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% -1,039.0% -26.0% ATS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.5x -0.4x — NGTF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.0% +3,200.0% -11.6% NGTF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +75.3%/yr -12.5%/yr NGTF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.9% 527.7% 102.5% ATS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 30/100 43/100 ATS

Percentile Scorecard

ATSNGTFOUST

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATSNGTFOUST
Valuation 87 #28 of 203 58 #6 of 13 9 #102 of 112
Growth 79 #40 of 188 0 #12 of 12 82 #21 of 109
Profitability 43 #104 of 183 46 #7 of 12 14 #90 of 104
Financial Health 24 #165 of 217 17 #11 of 13 88 #15 of 116
Shareholder Returns 27 #112 of 153 – 25 #61 of 81
Overall 52 30 43
  • ATS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • NGTF ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation
  • OUST ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATSNGTFOUSTSPY
1 month -0.5%+10,900.0%-25.0% -0.2%
3 months -29.5%+10,900.0%-3.3% +3.9%
6 months -40.3%+10,900.0%+25.5% +8.2%
Year to date -31.0%+6,500.0%+51.5% +12.9%
1 year -30.0%+3,200.0%-11.6% +12.3%
3 years -45.0%+16,400.0%+765.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -18.1%+449.1%+105.4% +23.3%
5 years —+1,550.0%-48.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+75.3%-12.5% +10.9%
10 years —+1,550.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+32.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureATSNGTFOUSTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.9%527.7%102.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.3%443.4%100.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.541.814.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.586.06-0.11 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.5%-95.5%-95.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.3%0.0%-47.6% -1.2%
52-week high $35.38$3.30$62.52 $779.14
52-week low $17.29$0.02$16.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATSNGTFOUST
P/E now vs peer median 54.8xmedian 25.2x -10.6x -40.6xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.9x 110.0xmedian 18.7x 11.0xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 14.0x -12.6x -37.8xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 21.7x -104.6xmedian 14.5x -27.2xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.3x 76.0xmedian 1.1x 6.0xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median -1.71median 1.32 0.16 -0.72median 1.17

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATSNGTFOUST
Revenue $2.12B $8.15M $204.91M
Gross profit $594.19M $5.34M $101.63M
Operating income $119.42M -$77.62M -$62.60M
Net income $33.97M -$84.65M -$53.33M
Free cash flow $180.36M -$8.56M -$82.47M
R&D – – $68.46M
EPS (diluted) $0.35 $-0.31 $-0.81
Cash & equivalents $140.09M $865.89K $91.76M
Total debt $3.79B $136.49M –
Shares (diluted) 98.14M 271.53M 65.99M
Enterprise value $1.19B $892.75M $1.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATSNGTFOUST
P/E 54.8x -10.6x -40.6x
P/FCF 10.3x -104.6x -27.2x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x -111.3x -41.7x
P/S 0.9x 110.0x 11.0x
P/B 1.5x 76.0x 6.0x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 153.7x 6.6x
EV/EBITDA 12.3x -12.6x -37.8x
EV/EBIT 21.7x -11.9x -31.7x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 113.5x 9.7x
EV/FCF 14.4x -107.9x -24.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x -114.8x -36.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.71 0.16 -0.72

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATSNGTFOUST
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.8% 1,463% 62.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 293.8% 51.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% – 90.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – 166.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 4,708% -1,607% 39.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -12.6% -234.8% 45.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 228.1% -1,032% 42.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -30.6% -140.7% 48.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 227.3% -398.7% 52.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.0% -65.0% 56.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 32.1% -786.1% -329.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 77.8% -88.4% 27.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.0% -808.6% -416.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 279.9% -92.3% 17.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATSNGTFOUST
Gross margin 28.0% 65.5% 49.6%
EBITDA margin 10.0% -901.7% -25.6%
Operating margin 5.6% -952.6% -30.6%
Pretax margin 2.4% -1,039% -25.5%
Net margin 1.6% -1,039% -26.0%
FCF margin 8.5% -105.1% -40.2%
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% -98.8% -26.3%
Return on equity 2.7% -179.3% -16.5%
Return on assets 1.1% -87.5% -12.5%
Return on invested capital 3.7% – –
Return on capital employed – -119.7% -18.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 6.0x 0.1x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 24.6% 18.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATSNGTFOUST
Debt / assets 28.8% 45.3% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 2.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.5x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 4.8x -3.4x –
Liabilities / assets 57.9% 81.7% 21.8%
Equity / assets 42.1% 18.3% 78.2%
Interest coverage 1.7x -12.3x –
Current ratio – 0.1x 4.2x
Quick ratio – 0.0x 3.5x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 3.1x
Altman Z-score – 2.94 10.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATSNGTFOUST
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.3% 0.0% -6.2%
Shareholder yield 0.3% 0.0% -6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATSNGTFOUST
Forward P/E 18.4xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.03FY2026 – $-0.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -14.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +37.9% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.98BFY2026 – $229.51MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.6%FY2026 – +35.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.9% – +36.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATSNGTFOUST
Held by institutions 83.4% – 53.9%
Institutions holding 143 – 330
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.9% – +19.0%
Institutions buying 82 – 233
Institutions selling 46 – 66
Buyers to sellers 1.78 – 3.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATSNGTFOUST
ATS 1.00 0.03 0.21
NGTF 0.03 1.00 0.03
OUST 0.21 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATS, NGTF and OUST?

Ouster (OUST) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ats (ATS) $1.86B, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) $896.03M, Ouster (OUST) $2.25B.

Which company is growing faster?

NightFood Holdings (NGTF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ats (ATS) +14.8%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +1,462.5%, Ouster (OUST) +62.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ats (ATS) has the highest net margin (Ats (ATS) 1.6%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) -1,039.0%, Ouster (OUST) -26.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NightFood Holdings (NGTF) returned the most: Ats (ATS) -30.0%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +3,200.0%, Ouster (OUST) -11.6%. Over five years, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) compounded fastest (NightFood Holdings (NGTF) +75.3%/yr, Ouster (OUST) -12.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ats (ATS) has been the steadiest (Ats (ATS) 51.9%, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) 527.7%, Ouster (OUST) 102.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATS, NGTF and OUST?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NightFood Holdings (NGTF) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.