ATS vs FTV vs IPGP Stock Comparison

Ats, Fortive and Ipg Photonics Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ATS ATS Corp /ATS
$18.98 -0.6% 1M -29.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.86B
P/E
54.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.12B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
2 wins
FTV Fortive Corp
$60.78 +8.3% 1M +22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$18.71B
P/E
35.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
0.00%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
8 wins
IPGP Ipg Photonics Corp
$72.81 -6.8% 1M -15.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.16B
P/E
114.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.07B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fortive leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Fortive 8, Ats 2, Ipg Photonics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATSFTVIPGPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.86B $18.71B $3.16B FTV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 54.7x 35.0x 114.7x FTV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.4x 19.0x 69.3x ATS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.8% +5.6% +13.0% ATS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% 12.4% 2.6% FTV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.7% 7.4% — FTV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.5x 2.5x — FTV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.9% +22.9% -15.9% FTV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -3.9%/yr -14.3%/yr FTV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.0% 26.8% 72.1% FTV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 48/100 59/100 IPGP

Percentile Scorecard

ATSFTVIPGP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATSFTVIPGP
Valuation 87 #28 of 203 45 #112 of 203 40 #123 of 203
Growth 79 #40 of 187 19 #151 of 187 31 #129 of 187
Profitability 44 #105 of 185 73 #50 of 185 32 #127 of 185
Financial Health 24 #166 of 219 39 #133 of 219 96 #9 of 219
Shareholder Returns 26 #114 of 153 61 #61 of 153 94 #10 of 153
Overall 52 48 59
  • ATS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • IPGP ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATSFTVIPGPSPY
1 month -0.6%+8.3%-6.8% -0.8%
3 months -28.5%-3.4%-18.8% +3.5%
6 months -42.6%-2.0%-37.6% +7.0%
Year to date -31.1%+10.1%+1.7% +12.2%
1 year -29.9%+22.9%-15.9% +13.0%
3 years -45.0%-6.5%-17.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -18.1%-2.2%-6.2% +23.1%
5 years —-17.9%-53.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-3.9%-14.3% +11.0%
10 years —+27.2%-14.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+2.4%-1.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureATSFTVIPGPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.0%26.8%72.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.3%26.0%77.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.550.602.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.570.85-0.22 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.5%-46.1%-72.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.4%-5.3%-52.7% -1.8%
52-week high $35.38$64.16$153.91 $779.14
52-week low $17.29$49.16$69.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATSFTVIPGP
P/E now vs peer median 54.7xmedian 26.0x 34.6xmedian 26.0x 112.2xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.9x 4.3xmedian 1.9x 2.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 14.0x 17.4xmedian 14.0x 29.6xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 21.4x 19.6xmedian 21.4x 148.9xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.2x 3.0xmedian 2.2x 1.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.71median 1.26 -4.19median 1.26 -3.30median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATSFTVIPGP
Revenue $2.12B $4.32B $1.07B
Gross profit $594.19M $2.73B $410.10M
Operating income $119.42M $786.70M $7.97M
Net income $33.97M $534.40M $27.56M
Free cash flow $180.36M $937.60M $20.80M
R&D – $262.00M $123.44M
EPS (diluted) $0.35 $1.74 $0.64
Cash & equivalents $140.09M $374.20M $399.23M
Total debt $3.79B $3.51B –
Shares (diluted) 98.14M 307.60M 42.91M
Enterprise value $1.18B $17.17B -$233.71M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATSFTVIPGP
P/E 54.7x 34.6x 112.2x
P/FCF 10.3x 19.6x 148.9x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x 17.5x 32.1x
P/S 0.9x 4.3x 2.9x
P/B 1.5x 3.0x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 4.5x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 12.3x 17.4x 29.6x
EV/EBIT 21.7x 27.4x 279.3x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 5.0x 2.1x
EV/FCF 14.4x 23.0x 107.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x 20.5x 23.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.71 -4.19 -3.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATSFTVIPGP
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.8% 5.6% 13.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.5% -10.3% -7.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% 4.2% 25.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% -7.9% -6.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 4,708% 9.4% 103.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -12.6% -9.9% -62.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 228.1% -30.5% 112.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -30.6% -12.6% -36.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 227.3% -22.8% 112.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.0% -8.3% -34.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 32.1% -30.6% -36.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 77.8% -6.6% -24.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.0% -34.8% -67.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 279.9% -7.5% -43.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATSFTVIPGP
Gross margin 28.0% 63.2% 38.4%
EBITDA margin 10.0% 28.6% 7.0%
Operating margin 5.6% 18.2% 0.7%
Pretax margin 2.4% 15.6% 3.7%
Net margin 1.6% 12.4% 2.6%
FCF margin 8.5% 21.7% 1.9%
Operating cash flow margin 9.6% 24.4% 9.0%
Return on equity 2.7% 8.8% 1.3%
Return on assets 1.1% 4.6% 1.1%
Return on invested capital 3.7% 7.4% –
Return on capital employed – 7.6% 0.4%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 6.0x 2.0x 3.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 2.7% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATSFTVIPGP
Debt / assets 28.8% 30.2% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.5x 2.5x –
Debt / FCF 4.8x 3.7x –
Liabilities / assets 57.9% 47.7% 12.3%
Equity / assets 42.1% 52.3% 87.7%
Interest coverage 1.7x 12.8x –
Current ratio – 1.2x 6.2x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 4.4x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 3.6x
Altman Z-score – 3.30 8.84

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATSFTVIPGP
Dividend yield – 0.4% –
Net buyback yield 0.3% 10.7% 4.3%
Shareholder yield 0.3% 11.1% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 10.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 6.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -48.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -17.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATSFTVIPGP
Forward P/E 18.4xFY2026 19.0xFY2026 69.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.03FY2026 $3.20FY2026 $1.05FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -14.9%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +43.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.9% -3.1% +109.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.98BFY2026 $4.63BFY2026 $1.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.6%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.9% -6.7% +7.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATSFTVIPGP
Held by institutions 83.4% 100.0% 71.5%
Institutions holding 143 803 356
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.9% +2.8% +4.7%
Institutions buying 82 350 214
Institutions selling 46 301 96
Buyers to sellers 1.78 1.16 2.23

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATSFTVIPGP
ATS 1.00 0.29 0.21
FTV 0.29 1.00 0.01
IPGP 0.21 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATS, FTV and IPGP?

Fortive (FTV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ats (ATS) $1.86B, Fortive (FTV) $18.71B, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) $3.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, ATS, FTV and IPGP?

Fortive (FTV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ats (ATS) 54.7x, Fortive (FTV) 35.0x, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 114.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ats (ATS) is cheapest (Ats (ATS) 18.4x, Fortive (FTV) 19.0x, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 69.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ats (ATS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ats (ATS) +14.8%, Fortive (FTV) +5.6%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) +13.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortive (FTV) has the highest net margin (Ats (ATS) 1.6%, Fortive (FTV) 12.4%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 2.6%). On return on invested capital, Fortive (FTV) leads (Ats (ATS) 3.7%, Fortive (FTV) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortive (FTV) returned the most: Ats (ATS) -29.9%, Fortive (FTV) +22.9%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) -15.9%. Over five years, Fortive (FTV) compounded fastest (Fortive (FTV) -3.9%/yr, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) -14.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ats (ATS) 0.00%, Fortive (FTV) 0.00%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 0.00%. Ats (ATS) and Ipg Photonics (IPGP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortive (FTV) has been the steadiest (Ats (ATS) 52.0%, Fortive (FTV) 26.8%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 72.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATS, FTV and IPGP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortive (FTV) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.