ATPC vs CNTM vs DQWS Stock Comparison

Agape ATP, ConnectM Technology Solutions and DSwiss Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ATPC Agape ATP Corp
$1.37 -38.8% 1M -97.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
DQWS DSwiss Inc
$0.08 0.0% 1M +166.7% 1Y
Market cap
$16.55M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.48M
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

ConnectM Technology Solutions leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (ConnectM Technology Solutions 5, DSwiss 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATPCCNTMDQWSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.37M $23.76M $16.55M CNTM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.2x 10.2x -67.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +23.6% -63.7% CNTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.3% -16.6% CNTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -97.8% -47.1% +166.7% DQWS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -46.4%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 375.6% 132.4% 223.9% CNTM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 56/100 17/100 CNTM

Percentile Scorecard

ATPCCNTMDQWS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATPCCNTMDQWS
Valuation – 85 #20 of 124 24 #40 of 52
Growth 80 #11 of 50 71 #33 of 113 4 #48 of 50
Profitability – 55 #50 of 110 23 #35 of 45
Financial Health – 12 #114 of 129 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – 56 17
  • ATPC ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • DQWS ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATPCCNTMDQWSSPY
1 month -38.8%-20.0%0.0% -0.8%
3 months -43.4%-25.7%+166.7% +3.5%
6 months -31.5%-47.2%-11.1% +7.0%
Year to date -74.4%-68.0%+100.0% +12.2%
1 year -97.8%-47.1%+166.7% +13.0%
3 years -99.8%-98.8%-20.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -87.8%-77.0%-7.2% +23.1%
5 years ——-95.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year ——-46.4% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureATPCCNTMDQWSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 375.6%132.4%223.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 423.0%132.1%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.47-0.10-0.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.26-0.360.74 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-100.0%-98.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -98.0%-73.8%-11.1% -1.8%
52-week high $69.00$16.00$0.09 $779.14
52-week low $1.36$3.90$0.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATPCCNTMDQWS
P/E now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 18.6x 10.2xmedian 38.1x -67.3xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.6x 0.7xmedian 4.3x 11.2xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.0x —median 35.4x 227.5xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.4x —median 27.1x —median 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.1x 1.5xmedian 3.4x —median 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.97 0.38median 1.27 0.91median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATPCCNTMDQWS
Revenue – $36.02M $1.48M
Gross profit – $11.16M –
Operating income – -$12.45M –
Net income -$1.23M $2.42M -$245.94K
EPS (diluted) $-1.15 $0.03 $0.00
Cash & equivalents – $2.39M –
Total debt – $56.72M –
Shares (diluted) 1.00M 72.32M 206.90M
Enterprise value $1.37M $13.75M $16.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATPCCNTMDQWS
P/E -1.2x 10.2x -67.3x
P/FCF – – –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S – 0.7x 11.2x
P/B – 1.5x –
P/Tangible book – 1.7x –
EV/EBITDA – – 227.5x
EV/EBIT -0.5x -3.0x -21,808x
EV/Revenue – 1.1x 11.2x
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.38 0.91

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATPCCNTMDQWS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 23.6% -63.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 35.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 19.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -62.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 54.3% 108.3% -4,197%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.6% 31.4% -73.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 56.5% 106.0% -4,197%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -34.8% 26.7% -73.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATPCCNTMDQWS
Gross margin – 31.0% –
EBITDA margin – – 4.9%
Operating margin – -34.6% –
Pretax margin – -41.0% -15.4%
Net margin – 6.3% -16.6%
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – 27.8% –
Return on assets – 5.4% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -149.0% –
Asset turnover – 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATPCCNTMDQWS
Debt / assets – 31.1% –
Debt / equity – 1.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets – 70.1% –
Equity / assets – 29.9% –
Interest coverage – -7.6x –
Current ratio – 0.2x –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – -1.86 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATPCCNTMDQWS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATPCCNTMDQWS
EPS, next fiscal year – $-3.87FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $76.76MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +114.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.7% –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATPCCNTMDQWS
ATPC 1.00 -0.06 0.01
CNTM -0.06 1.00 0.00
DQWS 0.01 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATPC, CNTM and DQWS?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Agape ATP (ATPC) $1.37M, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $23.76M, DSwiss (DQWS) $16.55M.

Which company is growing faster?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) +23.6%, DSwiss (DQWS) -63.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has the highest net margin (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 6.3%, DSwiss (DQWS) -16.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year DSwiss (DQWS) returned the most: Agape ATP (ATPC) -97.8%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -47.1%, DSwiss (DQWS) +166.7%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has been the steadiest (Agape ATP (ATPC) 375.6%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.4%, DSwiss (DQWS) 223.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATPC, CNTM and DQWS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.