ATPC vs BBWI vs DQWS Stock Comparison

Agape ATP, Bath & Body Works and DSwiss Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ATPC Agape ATP Corp
$1.50 -33.0% 1M -97.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.56M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc.
$21.94 +33.4% 1M -15.7% 1Y
Market cap
$4.70B
P/E
7.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.38B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
6 wins
DQWS DSwiss Inc
$0.08 0.0% 1M +166.7% 1Y
Market cap
$16.55M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.48M
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Bath & Body Works leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Bath & Body Works 6, DSwiss 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionATPCBBWIDQWSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.56M $4.70B $16.55M BBWI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.3x 7.1x -67.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.8x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +0.1% -63.7% BBWI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 9.0% -16.6% BBWI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 32.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -97.6% -15.7% +166.7% DQWS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -20.6%/yr -35.2%/yr BBWI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 375.0% 61.8% 224.4% BBWI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 66/100 17/100 BBWI

Percentile Scorecard

ATPCBBWIDQWS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisATPCBBWIDQWS
Valuation – 90 #6 of 52 24 #40 of 52
Growth 80 #11 of 50 47 #27 of 50 4 #48 of 50
Profitability – 93 #4 of 45 23 #35 of 45
Financial Health – 31 #39 of 56 –
Shareholder Returns – 67 #11 of 31 –
Overall – 66 17
  • ATPC ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • BBWI ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • DQWS ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodATPCBBWIDQWSSPY
1 month -33.0%+33.4%0.0% -0.2%
3 months -35.3%+7.0%+166.7% +3.9%
6 months -33.9%+13.9%-11.1% +8.2%
Year to date -72.0%+9.3%+100.0% +12.9%
1 year -97.6%-15.7%+166.7% +12.3%
3 years -99.8%-22.4%-20.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -87.4%-8.1%-7.2% +23.3%
5 years —-68.3%-88.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-20.6%-35.2% +10.9%
10 years —-62.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-9.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureATPCBBWIDQWSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 375.0%61.8%224.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 423.0%64.0%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.431.42-0.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.26-0.250.74 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-81.1%-98.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -97.8%-15.9%-11.1% -1.2%
52-week high $69.00$26.09$0.09 $779.14
52-week low $1.36$14.85$0.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleATPCBBWIDQWS
P/E now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 18.5x 7.2xmedian 18.5x -67.3xmedian 18.5x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.6x 0.6xmedian 1.6x 11.2xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.9x 5.2xmedian 12.9x 227.5xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.6x 4.7xmedian 18.6x —median 18.6x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.2x -4.2xmedian 2.2x —median 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.97 3.40median 0.97 0.91median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsATPCBBWIDQWS
Revenue – $7.38B $1.48M
Gross profit – $3.23B –
Operating income – $1.13B –
Net income -$1.23M $662.00M -$245.94K
EPS (diluted) $-1.15 $3.28 $0.00
Cash & equivalents – $794.00M –
Total debt – $3.61B –
Shares (diluted) 1.00M 202.00M 206.90M
Enterprise value $1.56M $2.35B $16.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricATPCBBWIDQWS
P/E -1.3x 7.2x -67.3x
P/FCF – 4.7x –
P/Operating cash flow – – –
P/S – 0.6x 11.2x
P/B – -4.2x –
P/Tangible book – -3.6x –
EV/EBITDA – 5.2x 227.5x
EV/EBIT -0.6x 6.4x -21,808x
EV/Revenue – 1.0x 11.2x
EV/FCF – – –
EV/Operating cash flow – – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 3.40 0.91

Growth

14 metrics
MetricATPCBBWIDQWS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 0.1% -63.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.3% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -1.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -10.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -2.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 54.3% -9.1% -4,197%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.6% -2.1% -73.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 56.5% -5.0% -4,197%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -34.8% 2.1% -73.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricATPCBBWIDQWS
Gross margin – 43.8% –
EBITDA margin – 18.7% 4.9%
Operating margin – 15.4% –
Pretax margin – 12.2% -15.4%
Net margin – 9.0% -16.6%
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets – 12.9% –
Return on invested capital – 32.2% –
Return on capital employed – 33.3% –
Asset turnover – 1.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricATPCBBWIDQWS
Debt / assets – 70.1% –
Debt / equity – -3.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.0x –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets – 120.5% –
Equity / assets – -20.5% –
Interest coverage – 4.2x –
Current ratio – 1.2x –
Quick ratio – 0.6x –
Cash ratio – 0.5x –
Altman Z-score – 2.33 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricATPCBBWIDQWS
Dividend yield – 3.6% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 3.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusATPCBBWIDQWS
Forward P/E – 7.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.80FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -12.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -5.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.36BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +0.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersATPCBBWIDQWS
Held by institutions – 100.0% –
Institutions holding – 463 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.6% –
Institutions buying – 244 –
Institutions selling – 171 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.43 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ATPCBBWIDQWS
ATPC 1.00 -0.06 0.01
BBWI -0.06 1.00 -0.01
DQWS 0.01 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ATPC, BBWI and DQWS?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Agape ATP (ATPC) $1.56M, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) $4.70B, DSwiss (DQWS) $16.55M.

Which company is growing faster?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bath & Body Works (BBWI) +0.1%, DSwiss (DQWS) -63.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) has the highest net margin (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 9.0%, DSwiss (DQWS) -16.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year DSwiss (DQWS) returned the most: Agape ATP (ATPC) -97.6%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -15.7%, DSwiss (DQWS) +166.7%. Over five years, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) compounded fastest (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -20.6%/yr, DSwiss (DQWS) -35.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) has been the steadiest (Agape ATP (ATPC) 375.0%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 61.8%, DSwiss (DQWS) 224.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ATPC, BBWI and DQWS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.