KLAC vs ASML Stock Comparison

Kla and Asml Holding Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KLAC Kla Corp
$149.21 -20.6% 1M +26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$195.01B
P/E
40.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.58B
Div. yield
0.56%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,590.90 -8.8% 1M +54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$613.16B
P/E
56.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.57%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Asml Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Asml Holding 5, Kla 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionKLACASMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $195.01B $613.16B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 40.5x 56.5x KLAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.3x 33.5x KLAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.7% +22.9% ASML
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 35.6% 29.1% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 40.7% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.56% 0.57% ASML
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +26.1% +54.0% ASML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.4%/yr +14.7%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.5% 46.8% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 45/100 KLAC

Percentile Scorecard

KLACASML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisKLACASML
Valuation 45 #18 of 32 19 #26 of 32
Growth 52 #15 of 30 76 #8 of 30
Profitability 100 #1 of 28 85 #5 of 28
Financial Health 24 #29 of 38 5 #36 of 38
Shareholder Returns 64 #9 of 23 41 #14 of 23
Overall 57 45
  • KLAC ranked among 40 companies in Semiconductors
  • ASML ranked among 40 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodKLACASMLSPY
1 month -20.6%-8.8% -0.8%
3 months -26.6%-3.9% +3.5%
6 months -21.5%+11.1% +7.0%
Year to date +22.8%+48.7% +12.2%
1 year +26.1%+54.0% +13.0%
3 years +225.8%+169.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +48.3%+39.2% +23.1%
5 years +338.1%+98.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +34.4%+14.7% +11.0%
10 years +1,881.8%+1,431.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +34.8%+31.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureKLACASMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.5%46.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 65.4%46.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.792.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.431.15 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.7%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.5%-20.0% -1.8%
52-week high $301.71$1,989.44 $779.14
52-week low $109.71$966.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleKLACASML
P/E now vs peer median 40.5xmedian 42.4x 56.5xmedian 42.4x
P/S now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 9.8x 16.3xmedian 9.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 32.9xmedian 32.0x —median 32.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 51.8xmedian 32.1x 49.0xmedian 32.1x
P/B now vs peer median 30.7xmedian 4.0x 26.6xmedian 4.0x
PEG now vs peer median 2.73median 2.73 2.34median 2.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsKLACASML
Revenue $13.58B $37.62B
Gross profit $8.32B $19.58B
Operating income $5.66B –
Net income $4.83B –
Free cash flow $3.77B –
R&D $1.53B –
EPS (diluted) $3.66 $28.13
Cash & equivalents $1.65B $15.17B
Total debt $5.89B $5.16B
Shares (diluted) 1.32B 388.90M
Enterprise value $187.18B $568.85B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricKLACASML
P/E 40.5x 56.5x
P/FCF 51.8x 49.0x
P/Operating cash flow 47.1x –
P/S 14.4x 16.3x
P/B 30.7x 26.6x
P/Tangible book 32.0x 27.4x
EV/EBITDA 32.9x –
EV/EBIT 35.2x –
EV/Revenue 14.7x 16.0x
EV/FCF 52.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 48.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.73 2.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricKLACASML
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.7% 22.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.4% 24.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.9% 20.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 18.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 20.5% 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 24.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 0.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricKLACASML
Gross margin 61.3% 52.0%
EBITDA margin 44.6% –
Operating margin 41.7% –
Pretax margin 41.3% –
Net margin 35.6% 29.1%
FCF margin 27.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 30.5% –
Return on equity 79.3% –
Return on assets 27.7% –
Return on invested capital 40.7% –
Return on capital employed 43.2% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricKLACASML
Debt / assets 32.8% 8.7%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x –
Debt / FCF 1.6x –
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 61.2%
Equity / assets 35.4% 38.8%
Interest coverage 19.9x –
Current ratio 2.9x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 12.71 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricKLACASML
Dividend yield 0.6% 0.6%
Net buyback yield 1.1% –
Shareholder yield 1.7% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 21.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 28.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 17.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 13.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusKLACASML
Forward P/E 26.3xFY2027 33.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.67FY2027 $47.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +50.8%FY2027 +61.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.6% +42.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $19.18BFY2027 $47.22BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +41.2%FY2027 +21.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.6% +43.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersKLACASML
Held by institutions 91.0% 19.8%
Institutions holding 2,478 2,488
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% +8.0%
Institutions buying 1,285 1,356
Institutions selling 982 781
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.74

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

KLACASML
KLAC 1.00 0.81
ASML 0.81 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, KLAC and ASML?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Kla (KLAC) $195.01B, Asml Holding (ASML) $613.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, KLAC and ASML?

Kla (KLAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kla (KLAC) 40.5x, Asml Holding (ASML) 56.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kla (KLAC) is cheapest (Kla (KLAC) 26.3x, Asml Holding (ASML) 33.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asml Holding (ASML) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kla (KLAC) +11.7%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Kla (KLAC) 35.6%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Asml Holding (ASML) returned the most: Kla (KLAC) +26.1%, Asml Holding (ASML) +54.0%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Kla (KLAC) +34.4%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest dividend yield: Kla (KLAC) 0.56%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.57%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Kla (KLAC) 61.5%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do KLAC and ASML move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.81, a strong positive relationship. Holding both adds little diversification.

Which is the better stock, KLAC and ASML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Asml Holding (ASML) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.