ASX vs SANM vs UMC Stock Comparison

ASE Technology Holding, Sanmina and United Microelectronics Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SANM Sanmina Corp
$175.78 -20.1% 1M +30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.26B
P/E
30.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.76B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
1 win
UMC United Microelectronics Corp
$18.84 -21.0% 1M +146.9% 1Y
Market cap
$44.17B
P/E
16.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.11B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Microelectronics leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (United Microelectronics 6, ASE Technology Holding 4, Sanmina 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionASXSANMUMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $92.73B $9.26B $44.17B ASX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 47.5x 30.1x 16.7x UMC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.6x 15.5x 17.1x SANM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.2% +58.6% +87.7% UMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.5% 2.4% 18.7% UMC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.1% 7.8% 11.6% UMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 0.5x -1.0x UMC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +228.8% +30.3% +146.9% ASX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +43.9%/yr +36.1%/yr +12.9%/yr ASX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.3% 71.2% 64.5% ASX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 62/100 80/100 UMC

Percentile Scorecard

ASXSANMUMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisASXSANMUMC
Valuation 73 #26 of 94 80 #23 of 111 93 #8 of 94
Growth 80 #19 of 92 84 #18 of 108 79 #20 of 92
Profitability 69 #29 of 90 56 #46 of 104 73 #25 of 90
Financial Health 17 #82 of 99 28 #83 of 115 66 #34 of 99
Shareholder Returns 64 #27 of 73 – 89 #9 of 73
Overall 61 62 80
  • ASX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • SANM ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • UMC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodASXSANMUMCSPY
1 month +0.3%-20.1%-21.0% +0.9%
3 months +39.5%+7.3%+10.1% +5.9%
6 months +43.6%-15.8%+47.8% +8.5%
Year to date +172.9%+17.1%+139.7% +13.3%
1 year +228.8%+30.3%+146.9% +12.4%
3 years +487.3%+246.4%+166.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +80.5%+51.4%+38.7% +23.5%
5 years +517.0%+365.6%+83.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +43.9%+36.1%+12.9% +11.0%
10 years +657.4%+516.8%+907.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +22.4%+20.0%+26.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureASXSANMUMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.3%71.2%64.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.4%81.4%56.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.612.631.78 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.930.432.28 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.1%-45.4%-57.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-37.8%-32.7% -0.9%
52-week high $47.62$282.72$28.01 $779.14
52-week low $13.36$122.86$7.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleASXSANMUMC
P/E now vs peer median 48.8xmedian 46.0x 30.7xmedian 33.5x 17.4xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 7.9x 0.7xmedian 2.8x 3.4xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.2xmedian 28.3x 14.0xmedian 19.6x 11.6xmedian 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 41.4x 15.9xmedian 29.8x 21.7xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 4.6x 3.4xmedian 2.9x 3.2xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 6.29median 2.30 10.94median 1.10 2.74median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsASXSANMUMC
Revenue $22.92B $12.76B $14.11B
Gross profit $4.46B $1.15B $2.67B
Operating income $2.24B $530.30M $1.81B
Net income $2.65B $326.85M $2.64B
Free cash flow $12.11B $594.15M $2.19B
R&D $1.18B $33.59M $595.72M
EPS (diluted) $0.88 $5.59 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $1.84B $4.48B
Total debt $31.57B $2.17B $781.92M
Shares (diluted) 2.21B 55.13M 2.47B
Enterprise value $80.74B $3.50B $28.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricASXSANMUMC
P/E 48.8x 30.7x 17.4x
P/FCF 8.1x 15.9x 21.7x
P/Operating cash flow 18.0x 10.5x 12.6x
P/S 4.3x 0.7x 3.4x
P/B 8.0x 3.4x 3.2x
P/Tangible book 9.6x 3.4x 3.2x
EV/EBITDA 22.2x 14.0x 11.6x
EV/EBIT 46.0x 18.4x 24.2x
EV/Revenue 4.5x 0.8x 3.1x
EV/FCF 8.5x 16.4x 20.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.0x 10.8x 11.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 6.29 10.94 2.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricASXSANMUMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.2% 58.6% 87.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 11.9% 22.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 37.8% 65.2% 22.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 15.7% -2.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 68.3% 45.0% 29.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 4.3% 4.9% -6.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 83.5% 16.1% 97.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 0.7% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 81.8% 17.5% 97.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 2.8% 6.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 51.2% 90.3% 19.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.0% 55.4% 5.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 57.3% 62.5% 410.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.4% 146.2% 11.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricASXSANMUMC
Gross margin 19.5% 9.0% 18.9%
EBITDA margin 20.2% 5.4% 26.7%
Operating margin 9.8% 4.2% 12.8%
Pretax margin 10.7% 3.6% 30.5%
Net margin 8.5% 2.4% 18.7%
FCF margin 52.9% 4.7% 15.5%
Operating cash flow margin 23.6% 7.1% 26.7%
Return on equity 22.0% 12.2% 18.4%
Return on assets 8.4% 3.4% 12.5%
Return on invested capital 11.1% 7.8% 11.6%
Return on capital employed 8.4% 10.0% 9.6%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 2.8x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricASXSANMUMC
Debt / assets 25.2% 22.3% 3.7%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.8x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 0.5x -1.0x
Debt / FCF 0.7x 3.7x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 63.7% 71.7% 30.3%
Equity / assets 36.3% 28.3% 69.7%
Interest coverage 9.9x 5.6x 33.0x
Current ratio 0.3x 1.8x 3.3x
Quick ratio 1.5x 1.0x 2.6x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.4x 2.0x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricASXSANMUMC
Dividend yield 0.9% – 2.1%
Net buyback yield – – 0.6%
Shareholder yield 0.9% – 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusASXSANMUMC
Forward P/E 34.6xFY2026 15.5xFY2026 17.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.27FY2026 $11.31FY2026 $1.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +126.8%FY2026 +87.3%FY2026 +107.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.8% +19.5% -2.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.36BFY2026 $13.27BFY2026 $8.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 +63.3%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +32.0% +33.4% +24.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersASXSANMUMC
Held by institutions 6.9% 93.3% 7.1%
Institutions holding 482 569 362
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.5% -5.4% +3.2%
Institutions buying 308 317 220
Institutions selling 133 207 109
Buyers to sellers 2.32 1.53 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ASXSANMUMC
ASX 1.00 0.57 0.60
SANM 0.57 1.00 0.33
UMC 0.60 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ASX, SANM and UMC?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) is the largest by market capitalisation: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) $92.73B, Sanmina (SANM) $9.26B, United Microelectronics (UMC) $44.17B.

Which stock is cheaper, ASX, SANM and UMC?

United Microelectronics (UMC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 47.5x, Sanmina (SANM) 30.1x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 16.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sanmina (SANM) is cheapest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 34.6x, Sanmina (SANM) 15.5x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 17.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Microelectronics (UMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +18.2%, Sanmina (SANM) +58.6%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +87.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

United Microelectronics (UMC) has the highest net margin (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 8.5%, Sanmina (SANM) 2.4%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 18.7%). On return on invested capital, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 11.1%, Sanmina (SANM) 7.8%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 11.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ASE Technology Holding (ASX) returned the most: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +228.8%, Sanmina (SANM) +30.3%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +146.9%. Over five years, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) compounded fastest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +43.9%/yr, Sanmina (SANM) +36.1%/yr, United Microelectronics (UMC) +12.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has been the steadiest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 58.3%, Sanmina (SANM) 71.2%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 64.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ASX, SANM and UMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.