ASX vs DSWL vs SANM Stock Comparison

ASE Technology Holding, Deswell Industries and Sanmina Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
DSWL Deswell Industries Inc
$2.96 -3.0% 1M -14.7% 1Y
Market cap
$46.01M
P/E
4.4x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins
SANM Sanmina Corp
$173.06 -22.3% 1M +25.3% 1Y
Market cap
$8.65B
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.76B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

ASE Technology Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (ASE Technology Holding 5, Deswell Industries 3, Sanmina 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionASXDSWLSANMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.52B $46.01M $8.65B ASX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.7x 4.4x 28.1x DSWL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.1x — 15.3x SANM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.1% — +58.6% SANM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.8% — 2.4% ASX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.6% — 7.8% ASX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x — 0.5x SANM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +208.9% -14.7% +25.3% ASX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +44.4%/yr -5.7%/yr +35.6%/yr ASX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 43.1% 71.2% DSWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 96/100 62/100 DSWL

Percentile Scorecard

ASXDSWLSANM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisASXDSWLSANM
Valuation 80 #20 of 94 97 #4 of 112 81 #22 of 112
Growth 88 #12 of 92 – 84 #18 of 108
Profitability 69 #28 of 88 – 56 #46 of 104
Financial Health 16 #81 of 96 90 #13 of 116 27 #85 of 116
Shareholder Returns 66 #25 of 72 100 #1 of 78 –
Overall 64 96 62
  • ASX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • DSWL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SANM ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodASXDSWLSANMSPY
1 month -1.6%-3.0%-22.3% +0.7%
3 months +28.1%-8.6%-5.7% +3.7%
6 months +41.9%-13.2%-20.5% +7.1%
Year to date +176.9%-14.5%+15.3% +12.8%
1 year +208.9%-14.7%+25.3% +11.9%
3 years +505.7%+33.3%+244.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +82.4%+10.1%+51.0% +22.8%
5 years +526.1%-25.4%+358.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year +44.4%-5.7%+35.6% +10.9%
10 years +668.6%+68.2%+507.2% +262.0%
10 years, per year +22.6%+5.3%+19.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureASXDSWLSANMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%43.1%71.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.4%44.2%81.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.600.242.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.61-0.340.36 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.1%-56.6%-45.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.4%-27.1%-38.8% -1.2%
52-week high $47.62$4.06$282.72 $779.14
52-week low $13.75$2.91$122.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleASXDSWLSANM
P/E now vs peer median 39.8xmedian 46.4x 4.4xmedian 32.9x 30.3xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 7.8x 0.8xmedian 2.9x 0.7xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.9xmedian 27.5x —median 20.0x 13.8xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 40.1x 10.0xmedian 30.2x 15.6xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 4.7x 0.4xmedian 2.9x 3.4xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.61median 2.10 —median 1.08 10.77median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsASXDSWLSANM
Revenue $24.92B – $12.76B
Gross profit $5.18B – $1.15B
Operating income $2.83B – $530.30M
Net income $3.27B – $326.85M
Free cash flow $15.64B – $594.15M
R&D $1.26B – $33.59M
EPS (diluted) $1.10 – $5.59
Cash & equivalents $2.78B $23.06M $1.84B
Total debt $10.90B – $2.17B
Shares (diluted) 2.21B 15.92M 55.13M
Enterprise value $71.88B -$149.27M $2.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricASXDSWLSANM
P/E 39.8x 4.4x 30.3x
P/FCF 6.3x 10.0x 15.6x
P/Operating cash flow 15.2x – 10.3x
P/S 4.0x 0.8x 0.7x
P/B 7.5x 0.4x 3.4x
P/Tangible book 8.8x 0.4x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 19.9x – 13.8x
EV/EBIT 37.7x – 18.1x
EV/Revenue 4.3x – 0.8x
EV/FCF 6.8x – 16.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.4x – 10.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.61 – 10.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricASXDSWLSANM
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.1% – 58.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.9% – 11.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 53.2% – 65.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.2% – 15.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 100.1% – 45.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.2% – 4.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 110.4% – 16.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.9% – 0.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 114.2% – 17.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.7% – 2.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 92.0% – 90.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.6% – 55.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 86.3% – 62.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.2% – 146.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricASXDSWLSANM
Gross margin 20.8% – 9.0%
EBITDA margin 21.5% – 5.4%
Operating margin 11.4% – 4.2%
Pretax margin 12.0% – 3.6%
Net margin 9.8% – 2.4%
FCF margin 62.8% – 4.7%
Operating cash flow margin 26.1% – 7.1%
Return on equity 25.7% – 12.2%
Return on assets 9.0% – 3.4%
Return on invested capital 12.6% – 7.8%
Return on capital employed 9.0% – 10.0%
Asset turnover 0.7x – 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x – 2.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricASXDSWLSANM
Debt / assets 27.9% – 22.3%
Debt / equity 0.8x – 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x – 0.5x
Debt / FCF 0.7x – 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 66.0% 15.8% 71.7%
Equity / assets 34.0% 84.2% 28.3%
Interest coverage 10.9x – 5.6x
Current ratio 0.3x 5.2x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.8x 3.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.7x 2.5x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricASXDSWLSANM
Dividend yield 0.9% 10.1% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.9% 10.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusASXDSWLSANM
Forward P/E 35.1xFY2026 – 15.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.27FY2026 – $11.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +126.8%FY2026 – +87.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.8% – +19.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.36BFY2026 – $13.27BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 – +63.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +32.0% – +33.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersASXDSWLSANM
Held by institutions 6.9% – 93.3%
Institutions holding 483 – 570
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.5% – -5.4%
Institutions buying 309 – 317
Institutions selling 133 – 208
Buyers to sellers 2.32 – 1.52

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ASXDSWLSANM
ASX 1.00 0.17 0.58
DSWL 0.17 1.00 0.08
SANM 0.58 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ASX, DSWL and SANM?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) is the largest by market capitalisation: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) $84.52B, Deswell Industries (DSWL) $46.01M, Sanmina (SANM) $8.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, ASX, DSWL and SANM?

Deswell Industries (DSWL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 34.7x, Deswell Industries (DSWL) 4.4x, Sanmina (SANM) 28.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sanmina (SANM) is cheapest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 35.1x, Sanmina (SANM) 15.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sanmina (SANM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +24.1%, Sanmina (SANM) +58.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has the highest net margin (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 9.8%, Sanmina (SANM) 2.4%). On return on invested capital, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 12.6%, Sanmina (SANM) 7.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ASE Technology Holding (ASX) returned the most: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +208.9%, Deswell Industries (DSWL) -14.7%, Sanmina (SANM) +25.3%. Over five years, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) compounded fastest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +44.4%/yr, Deswell Industries (DSWL) -5.7%/yr, Sanmina (SANM) +35.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Deswell Industries (DSWL) has been the steadiest (ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 57.8%, Deswell Industries (DSWL) 43.1%, Sanmina (SANM) 71.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ASX, DSWL and SANM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.