ASML vs TER vs VHUB Stock Comparison

Asml Holding, Teradyne and VenHub Global Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,635.57 -6.2% 1M +54.3% 1Y
Market cap
$630.38B
P/E
58.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.68%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
TER Teradyne, Inc
$323.68 -18.8% 1M +119.4% 1Y
Market cap
$50.62B
P/E
44.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.46B
Div. yield
0.16%
Test and Measurement Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Teradyne leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Teradyne 6, Asml Holding 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionASMLTERVHUBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $630.38B $50.62B $26.21M ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 58.1x 44.0x -0.4x TER
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.3x 33.5x — TER
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.9% +57.9% — TER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.1% 25.8% -11,799.2% ASML
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 35.3% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.68% 0.16% — ASML
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.3% +119.4% — TER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.0%/yr +18.8%/yr — TER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.8% 78.6% 162.6% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 66/100 2/100 TER

Percentile Scorecard

ASMLTERVHUB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisASMLTERVHUB
Valuation 18 #77 of 94 23 #87 of 112 0 #13 of 13
Growth 82 #17 of 92 90 #12 of 109 9 #11 of 12
Profitability 79 #20 of 90 94 #7 of 104 0 #12 of 12
Financial Health 13 #86 of 99 71 #34 of 116 0 #13 of 13
Shareholder Returns 42 #43 of 73 50 #41 of 81 –
Overall 47 66 2
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • TER ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • VHUB ranked among 14 companies in Robotics and Automation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodASMLTERVHUBSPY
1 month -6.2%-18.8%-46.3% -0.2%
3 months +3.3%+0.9%-60.8% +3.9%
6 months +18.1%-14.9%-56.1% +8.2%
Year to date +52.9%+67.2%— +12.9%
1 year +54.3%+119.4%— +12.3%
3 years +177.2%+286.1%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +40.5%+56.9%— +23.3%
5 years +101.1%+136.2%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.0%+18.8%— +10.9%
10 years +1,471.9%+1,318.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +31.7%+30.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureASMLTERVHUBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.8%78.6%162.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.4%85.3%198.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.273.381.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.161.52— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-59.7%-96.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.8%-33.1%-96.4% -1.2%
52-week high $1,989.44$483.84$8.08 $779.14
52-week low $966.57$144.38$0.29 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleASMLTERVHUB
P/E now vs peer median 58.1xmedian 45.6x 44.0xmedian 33.2x -0.4x
P/S now vs peer median 16.8xmedian 7.7x 11.3xmedian 2.8x 51.9xmedian 18.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 29.0x 33.6xmedian 20.0x -0.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 50.3xmedian 40.6x 65.8xmedian 29.8x -1.6xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 4.6x 14.6xmedian 3.0x -495.8xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.40median 2.28 1.52median 1.17 —

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsASMLTERVHUB
Revenue $37.62B $4.46B $505.29K
Gross profit $19.58B $2.64B -$111.65K
Operating income – $1.35B -$42.78M
Net income – $1.15B -$59.62M
Free cash flow – $769.75M -$16.53M
R&D – $559.87M $1.05M
EPS (diluted) $28.13 $7.29 $-0.69
Cash & equivalents $15.17B $349.54M $2.56M
Total debt $5.16B – –
Shares (diluted) 388.90M 157.69M 86.30M
Enterprise value $586.07B $49.43B $17.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricASMLTERVHUB
P/E 58.1x 44.0x -0.4x
P/FCF 50.3x 65.8x -1.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 47.5x -1.7x
P/S 16.8x 11.3x 51.9x
P/B 27.4x 14.6x -495.8x
P/Tangible book 28.1x 15.0x -495.8x
EV/EBITDA – 33.6x -0.6x
EV/EBIT – 37.2x -0.6x
EV/Revenue 16.5x 11.3x 46.8x
EV/FCF – 65.3x -1.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 47.2x -1.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.40 1.52 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricASMLTERVHUB
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.9% 57.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.4% 16.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% 58.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 16.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 160.9% -193.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 28.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 145.2% -76.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 27.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 35.2% 149.0% 42.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.2% 29.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 34.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 38.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricASMLTERVHUB
Gross margin 52.0% 59.2% -22.1%
EBITDA margin – 33.5% -8,423%
Operating margin – 30.2% -8,466%
Pretax margin – 30.2% -10,867%
Net margin 29.1% 25.8% -11,799%
FCF margin – 17.2% -3,271%
Operating cash flow margin – 23.9% -3,074%
Return on equity – 35.2% -3,339%
Return on assets – 24.9% -559.7%
Return on invested capital – 35.3% –
Return on capital employed – 37.8% -1,898%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.0x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.9x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.7% 6,401%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricASMLTERVHUB
Debt / assets 8.7% – –
Debt / equity 0.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 29.5% 100.7%
Equity / assets 38.8% 70.5% -0.7%
Interest coverage – 118.8x -3.5x
Current ratio 1.3x 2.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.3x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score – 23.43 -34.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricASMLTERVHUB
Dividend yield 0.7% 0.2% –
Net buyback yield – 0.9% -72.0%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 1.1% -72.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusASMLTERVHUB
Forward P/E 34.3xFY2026 33.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $47.62FY2026 $9.65FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +61.2%FY2026 +143.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +42.0% +25.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.18BFY2026 $5.01BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 +57.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +42.9% +18.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersASMLTERVHUB
Held by institutions 19.8% 97.3% –
Institutions holding 2,492 1,419 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.0% +5.2% –
Institutions buying 1,359 828 –
Institutions selling 782 456 –
Buyers to sellers 1.74 1.82 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ASMLTERVHUB
ASML 1.00 0.71 0.04
TER 0.71 1.00 -0.07
VHUB 0.04 -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ASML, TER and VHUB?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Asml Holding (ASML) $630.38B, Teradyne (TER) $50.62B, VenHub Global (VHUB) $26.21M.

Which stock is cheaper, ASML, TER and VHUB?

Teradyne (TER) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Asml Holding (ASML) 58.1x, Teradyne (TER) 44.0x, VenHub Global (VHUB) -0.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Teradyne (TER) is cheapest (Asml Holding (ASML) 34.3x, Teradyne (TER) 33.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teradyne (TER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Teradyne (TER) +57.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest net margin (Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Teradyne (TER) 25.8%, VenHub Global (VHUB) -11,799.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Teradyne (TER) returned the most: Asml Holding (ASML) +54.3%, Teradyne (TER) +119.4%. Over five years, Teradyne (TER) compounded fastest (Asml Holding (ASML) +15.0%/yr, Teradyne (TER) +18.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest dividend yield: Asml Holding (ASML) 0.68%, Teradyne (TER) 0.16%. VenHub Global (VHUB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%, Teradyne (TER) 78.6%, VenHub Global (VHUB) 162.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ASML, TER and VHUB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Teradyne (TER) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.