ASML vs ROK vs KLAC Stock Comparison

Asml Holding, Rockwell Automation and Kla Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,590.90 -8.8% 1M +54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$613.16B
P/E
56.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.57%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
3 wins
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc
$429.70 -1.0% 1M +20.5% 1Y
Market cap
$47.72B
P/E
39.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.97B
Div. yield
1.28%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$149.21 -20.6% 1M +26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$195.01B
P/E
40.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.58B
Div. yield
0.56%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kla leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kla 5, Rockwell Automation 4, Asml Holding 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionASMLROKKLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $613.16B $47.72B $195.01B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 56.5x 39.7x 40.5x ROK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 33.5x 34.4x 26.3x KLAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.9% +11.3% +11.7% ASML
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.1% 13.4% 35.6% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 21.0% 40.7% KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.3x 0.7x KLAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.57% 1.28% 0.56% ROK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.0% +20.5% +26.1% ASML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.7%/yr +6.5%/yr +34.4%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.8% 31.3% 61.5% ROK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 60/100 57/100 ROK

Percentile Scorecard

ASMLROKKLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisASMLROKKLAC
Valuation 19 #26 of 32 41 #40 of 67 45 #18 of 32
Growth 76 #8 of 30 64 #20 of 54 52 #15 of 30
Profitability 85 #5 of 28 96 #3 of 53 100 #1 of 28
Financial Health 5 #36 of 38 35 #54 of 82 24 #29 of 38
Shareholder Returns 41 #14 of 23 66 #14 of 39 64 #9 of 23
Overall 45 60 57
  • ASML ranked among 40 companies in Semiconductors
  • ROK ranked among 82 companies in Machinery
  • KLAC ranked among 40 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodASMLROKKLACSPY
1 month -8.8%-1.0%-20.6% -0.8%
3 months -3.9%-7.8%-26.6% +3.5%
6 months +11.1%+5.6%-21.5% +7.0%
Year to date +48.7%+10.4%+22.8% +12.2%
1 year +54.0%+20.5%+26.1% +13.0%
3 years +169.6%+64.0%+225.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +39.2%+17.9%+48.3% +23.1%
5 years +98.6%+37.0%+338.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +14.7%+6.5%+34.4% +11.0%
10 years +1,431.9%+256.2%+1,881.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +31.4%+13.5%+34.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureASMLROKKLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.8%31.3%61.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.4%31.8%65.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.261.402.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.150.660.43 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.9%-45.6%-51.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.0%-13.2%-50.5% -1.8%
52-week high $1,989.44$495.08$301.71 $779.14
52-week low $966.57$348.51$109.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleASMLROKKLAC
P/E now vs peer median 56.5xmedian 42.4x 39.7xmedian 22.6x 40.5xmedian 42.4x
P/S now vs peer median 16.3xmedian 9.8x 5.3xmedian 1.9x 14.4xmedian 9.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 32.0x 24.1xmedian 13.4x 32.9xmedian 32.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 49.0xmedian 32.1x 31.7xmedian 20.5x 51.8xmedian 32.1x
P/B now vs peer median 26.6xmedian 4.0x 13.6xmedian 1.4x 30.7xmedian 4.0x
PEG now vs peer median 2.34median 2.73 -9.05median 0.76 2.73median 2.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsASMLROKKLAC
Revenue $37.62B $8.97B $13.58B
Gross profit $19.58B $4.41B $8.32B
Operating income – $1.77B $5.66B
Net income – $1.20B $4.83B
Free cash flow – $1.50B $3.77B
R&D – $716.00M $1.53B
EPS (diluted) $28.13 $10.76 $3.66
Cash & equivalents $15.17B $479.00M $1.65B
Total debt $5.16B $13.81B $5.89B
Shares (diluted) 388.90M 111.60M 1.32B
Enterprise value $568.85B $45.91B $187.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricASMLROKKLAC
P/E 56.5x 39.7x 40.5x
P/FCF 49.0x 31.7x 51.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 27.6x 47.1x
P/S 16.3x 5.3x 14.4x
P/B 26.6x 13.6x 30.7x
P/Tangible book 27.4x 17.1x 32.0x
EV/EBITDA – 24.1x 32.9x
EV/EBIT – 28.5x 35.2x
EV/Revenue 16.0x 5.6x 14.7x
EV/FCF – 33.6x 52.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 29.2x 48.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.34 -9.05 2.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricASMLROKKLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.9% 11.3% 11.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.4% 1.3% 9.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.9% 1.9% 12.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 7.5% 9.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -7.1% 12.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% 12.3%
Net income growth (1Y) – 23.8% 18.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -5.5% 12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 35.2% 25.2% 20.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.2% -4.4% 14.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 13.8% 1.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 22.8% 4.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 13.9% 0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 23.6% 4.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricASMLROKKLAC
Gross margin 52.0% 49.1% 61.3%
EBITDA margin – 23.3% 44.6%
Operating margin – 19.7% 41.7%
Pretax margin – 14.7% 41.3%
Net margin 29.1% 13.4% 35.6%
FCF margin – 16.8% 27.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 19.3% 30.5%
Return on equity – 30.9% 79.3%
Return on assets – 9.8% 27.7%
Return on invested capital – 21.0% 40.7%
Return on capital employed – 23.6% 43.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.4x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% 2.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricASMLROKKLAC
Debt / assets 8.7% 29.4% 32.8%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.9x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.3x 0.7x
Debt / FCF – 2.2x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 68.5% 64.6%
Equity / assets 38.8% 31.5% 35.4%
Interest coverage – 12.8x 19.9x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.1x 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.7x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 5.88 12.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricASMLROKKLAC
Dividend yield 0.6% 1.3% 0.6%
Net buyback yield – 1.5% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 2.8% 1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 21.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 28.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 17.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 13.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusASMLROKKLAC
Forward P/E 33.5xFY2026 34.4xFY2026 26.3xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $47.56FY2026 $12.50FY2026 $5.67FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +61.0%FY2026 +18.7%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +42.1% +12.3% +16.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.22BFY2026 $8.50BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +21.0%FY2026 +1.9%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +43.0% +19.4% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersASMLROKKLAC
Held by institutions 19.8% 89.2% 91.0%
Institutions holding 2,488 1,540 2,478
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.0% +3.5% +4.2%
Institutions buying 1,356 805 1,285
Institutions selling 781 437 982
Buyers to sellers 1.74 1.84 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ASMLROKKLAC
ASML 1.00 0.52 0.81
ROK 0.52 1.00 0.49
KLAC 0.81 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ASML, ROK and KLAC?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Asml Holding (ASML) $613.16B, Rockwell Automation (ROK) $47.72B, Kla (KLAC) $195.01B.

Which stock is cheaper, ASML, ROK and KLAC?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Asml Holding (ASML) 56.5x, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 39.7x, Kla (KLAC) 40.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kla (KLAC) is cheapest (Asml Holding (ASML) 33.5x, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 34.4x, Kla (KLAC) 26.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asml Holding (ASML) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +11.3%, Kla (KLAC) +11.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 13.4%, Kla (KLAC) 35.6%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 21.0%, Kla (KLAC) 40.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Asml Holding (ASML) returned the most: Asml Holding (ASML) +54.0%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +20.5%, Kla (KLAC) +26.1%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Asml Holding (ASML) +14.7%/yr, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +6.5%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +34.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) has the highest dividend yield: Asml Holding (ASML) 0.57%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 1.28%, Kla (KLAC) 0.56%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rockwell Automation (ROK) has been the steadiest (Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 31.3%, Kla (KLAC) 61.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ASML, ROK and KLAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.