ARW vs VDTA vs MGRT Stock Comparison

Arrow Electronics, Vertical Data and Mega Fortune Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ARW Arrow Electronics, Inc.
$214.35 -7.9% 1M +78.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.28B
P/E
13.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.92B
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
2 wins
VDTA Vertical Data Inc.
$3.61 -32.6% 1M
Market cap
$48.96M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
MGRT Mega Fortune Co Ltd
$120.20 -0.2% 1M +2,404.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.29B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Arrow Electronics leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Arrow Electronics 2, Mega Fortune 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionARWVDTAMGRTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.28B $48.96M $1.29B ARW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.9x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.3x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.3% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +78.7% — +2,404.2% MGRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.7%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.5% 110.0% 206.7% ARW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

ARWVDTAMGRT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisARWVDTAMGRT
Valuation 76 #13 of 50 – –
Growth 77 #11 of 45 – –
Profitability 43 #24 of 41 – –
Financial Health 31 #43 of 62 – 82 #12 of 62
Shareholder Returns 35 #20 of 30 – –
Overall 52 – –
  • ARW ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • VDTA ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • MGRT ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodARWVDTAMGRTSPY
1 month -7.9%-32.6%-0.2% -0.8%
3 months +0.5%-4.0%+22.6% +3.5%
6 months +14.9%—-14.7% +7.0%
Year to date +94.5%—+1,500.5% +12.2%
1 year +78.7%—+2,404.2% +13.0%
3 years +91.7%—— +86.3%
3 years, per year +24.2%—— +23.1%
5 years +90.1%—— +68.6%
5 years, per year +13.7%—— +11.0%
10 years +243.6%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +13.1%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureARWVDTAMGRTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.5%110.0%206.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.8%109.0%143.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.470.36-0.82 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.10—11.63 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.2%-46.0%-63.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.5%-43.1%-15.5% -1.8%
52-week high $242.14$6.35$142.20 $779.14
52-week low $101.87$2.67$4.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleARWVDTAMGRT
P/E now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 17.9x —median 17.9x —median 17.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.7x —median 0.7x —median 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x —median 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x —median 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 137.0xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median -1.46median 1.49 —median 1.49 —median 1.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsARWVDTAMGRT
Revenue $35.92B – –
Gross profit $4.06B – –
Operating income $1.21B – –
Net income $811.67M – –
Free cash flow $825.46M – –
EPS (diluted) $15.65 – –
Cash & equivalents $244.63M – $9.81K
Total debt $10.85B – $2.52M
Shares (diluted) 51.87M 13.30M 10.79M
Enterprise value $10.23B $48.96M $1.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricARWVDTAMGRT
P/E 13.6x – –
P/FCF 13.2x – –
P/Operating cash flow 11.7x – –
P/S 0.3x – –
P/B 1.5x – 137.0x
P/Tangible book 1.6x – 144.2x
EV/EBITDA 9.5x – –
EV/EBIT 10.6x – –
EV/Revenue 0.4x – –
EV/FCF 15.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 13.7x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.46 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricARWVDTAMGRT
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 68.5% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -13.0% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 73.6% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -12.5% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 75.3% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -9.3% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 69.4% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 39.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 76.3% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricARWVDTAMGRT
Gross margin 11.3% – –
EBITDA margin 3.8% – –
Operating margin 3.4% – –
Pretax margin 2.9% – –
Net margin 2.3% – –
FCF margin 2.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 2.6% – –
Return on equity 11.7% – –
Return on assets 2.2% – –
Return on invested capital 10.2% – –
Return on capital employed 14.4% – –
Asset turnover 1.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricARWVDTAMGRT
Debt / assets 5.7% – 4.5%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x – –
Debt / FCF 2.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 81.6% – 10.8%
Equity / assets 18.4% – 89.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.2x – 7.4x
Quick ratio 1.0x – 3.0x
Cash ratio 0.0x – 0.0x
Altman Z-score 1.70 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricARWVDTAMGRT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 1.1% – –
Shareholder yield 1.1% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusARWVDTAMGRT
Forward P/E 9.3xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $23.06FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +109.3%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +9.8% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $41.84BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +35.6%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -3.8% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersARWVDTAMGRT
Held by institutions 100.0% – –
Institutions holding 632 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.6% – –
Institutions buying 359 – –
Institutions selling 195 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.84 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ARWVDTAMGRT
ARW 1.00 -0.02 0.03
VDTA -0.02 1.00 -0.06
MGRT 0.03 -0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ARW, VDTA and MGRT?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Arrow Electronics (ARW) $11.28B, Vertical Data (VDTA) $48.96M, Mega Fortune (MGRT) $1.29B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mega Fortune (MGRT) returned the most: Arrow Electronics (ARW) +78.7%, Mega Fortune (MGRT) +2,404.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Arrow Electronics (ARW) has been the steadiest (Arrow Electronics (ARW) 37.5%, Vertical Data (VDTA) 110.0%, Mega Fortune (MGRT) 206.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ARW, VDTA and MGRT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Arrow Electronics (ARW) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.