ARMK vs IRM vs FSV Stock Comparison

Aramark, Iron Mountain and FirstService Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ARMK Aramark
$52.57 -5.7% 1M +31.8% 1Y
Market cap
$14.34B
P/E
37.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.85B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
4 wins
IRM Iron Mountain Inc
$109.94 -4.5% 1M +5.8% 1Y
Market cap
$33.66B
P/E
80.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.56B
Div. yield
0.03%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins
FSV FirstService Corp
$143.67 +10.9% 1M -13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$6.56B
P/E
56.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.68B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Iron Mountain leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Iron Mountain 6, Aramark 4, FirstService 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionARMKIRMFSVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.34B $33.66B $6.56B IRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.5x 80.4x 56.9x ARMK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.5x 47.4x 24.8x ARMK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +17.4% +3.7% IRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.9% 5.5% 2.0% IRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.8% 7.6% 10.0% FSV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.1x 6.7x 2.6x FSV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.03% 0.00% IRM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +31.8% +5.8% -13.8% ARMK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.5%/yr +19.1%/yr -6.6%/yr IRM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.4% 33.1% 30.6% ARMK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 47/100 42/100 IRM

Percentile Scorecard

ARMKIRMFSV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisARMKIRMFSV
Valuation 48 #59 of 112 21 #89 of 112 42 #65 of 112
Growth 84 #16 of 96 91 #10 of 96 58 #41 of 96
Profitability 47 #50 of 93 66 #32 of 93 65 #33 of 93
Financial Health 18 #103 of 126 7 #117 of 126 37 #80 of 126
Shareholder Returns 32 #46 of 67 52 #33 of 67 8 #62 of 67
Overall 46 47 42
  • ARMK ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • IRM ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • FSV ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodARMKIRMFSVSPY
1 month -5.7%-4.5%+10.9% -1.0%
3 months -8.1%-14.4%+4.5% +2.9%
6 months +13.6%-5.2%-1.9% +6.4%
Year to date +42.6%+32.5%-7.6% +11.4%
1 year +31.8%+5.8%-13.8% +13.1%
3 years +98.3%+84.3%+2.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +25.7%+22.6%+0.9% +21.5%
5 years +43.4%+139.0%-28.9% +67.7%
5 years, per year +7.5%+19.1%-6.6% +10.9%
10 years +42.2%+223.6%+220.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year +3.6%+12.5%+12.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureARMKIRMFSVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.4%33.1%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.4%34.4%31.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.601.150.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.210.17-0.45 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.4%-40.0%-44.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.7%-17.4%-13.8% -2.5%
52-week high $62.39$133.06$166.73 $779.14
52-week low $36.04$78.86$125.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleARMKIRMFSV
P/E now vs peer median 36.2xmedian 21.0x 78.2xmedian 21.0x 56.7xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.9x 4.3xmedian 0.9x 1.2xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 12.3x 19.6xmedian 12.3x 14.8xmedian 12.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 32.0xmedian 15.1x -66.7xmedian 15.1x 12.2xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 2.4x -25.5xmedian 2.4x 7.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -3.09median 1.02 29.92median 1.02 152.23median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsARMKIRMFSV
Revenue $19.85B $7.56B $5.68B
Gross profit $1.69B $4.10B $1.88B
Operating income $870.70M $1.42B $339.62M
Net income $382.71M $434.46M $199.45M
Free cash flow $432.81M -$490.92M $536.84M
EPS (diluted) $1.43 $1.40 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $499.43M $204.79M $160.76M
Total debt $6.13B $17.35B $1.55B
Shares (diluted) 268.54M 299.85M 45.75M
Enterprise value $12.29B $32.85B $5.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricARMKIRMFSV
P/E 36.2x 78.2x 56.7x
P/FCF 32.0x -66.7x 12.2x
P/Operating cash flow 15.2x 19.8x 15.7x
P/S 0.7x 4.3x 1.2x
P/B 4.1x -25.5x 7.0x
P/Tangible book 9.4x -13.0x 7.0x
EV/EBITDA 14.0x 19.6x 14.8x
EV/EBIT 22.4x 35.2x 23.4x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 6.6x 1.4x
EV/FCF 45.0x -101.6x 14.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.4x 30.1x 19.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.09 29.92 152.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricARMKIRMFSV
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 17.4% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.3% 13.0% 9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.6% 13.5% 2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.2% 11.1% 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.8% 35.4% -0.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.2% 12.8% 8.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 5.8% 867.3% 4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.1% 4.1% 6.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 4.6% 897.5% 12.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -11.7% 2.6% 0.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.7% 31.7% 0.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 68.3% 17.2% 23.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 54.2% 50.3% -1.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 77.8% -60.8% 19.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricARMKIRMFSV
Gross margin 8.5% 54.2% 33.1%
EBITDA margin 7.0% 33.6% 9.5%
Operating margin 4.4% 18.8% 6.0%
Pretax margin 2.6% 6.7% 4.8%
Net margin 1.9% 5.5% 2.0%
FCF margin 2.2% -6.5% 9.4%
Operating cash flow margin 4.6% 21.9% 7.4%
Return on equity 11.5% – 18.5%
Return on assets 2.8% 2.0% 4.5%
Return on invested capital 6.8% 7.6% 10.0%
Return on capital employed 8.0% 7.5% 9.8%
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.3x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 3.8x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 1.8% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricARMKIRMFSV
Debt / assets 43.9% 79.0% 34.9%
Debt / equity 1.8x -13.5x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.1x 6.7x 2.6x
Debt / FCF 14.2x -35.3x 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 75.7% 105.8% 78.9%
Equity / assets 24.3% -5.8% 21.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.7x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.6x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.55 1.72 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricARMKIRMFSV
Dividend yield 0.9% 3.1% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 0.3% – -9.2%
Shareholder yield 1.3% 3.1% -8.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 32.0% 229.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 28.3% -203.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.9% 16.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 11.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusARMKIRMFSV
Forward P/E 24.5xFY2026 47.4xFY2026 24.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.15FY2026 $2.32FY2026 $5.79FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.8%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 +1.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.9% +28.0% +8.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $21.42BFY2026 $8.36BFY2026 $5.34BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.7%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.6% +2.2% +19.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersARMKIRMFSV
Held by institutions 98.9% 86.2% 69.9%
Institutions holding 544 1,161 275
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.0% +1.9% +7.2%
Institutions buying 320 598 147
Institutions selling 157 377 101
Buyers to sellers 2.04 1.59 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ARMKIRMFSV
ARMK 1.00 0.19 0.20
IRM 0.19 1.00 0.08
FSV 0.20 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ARMK, IRM and FSV?

Iron Mountain (IRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Aramark (ARMK) $14.34B, Iron Mountain (IRM) $33.66B, FirstService (FSV) $6.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, ARMK, IRM and FSV?

Aramark (ARMK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Aramark (ARMK) 37.5x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 80.4x, FirstService (FSV) 56.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Aramark (ARMK) is cheapest (Aramark (ARMK) 24.5x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 47.4x, FirstService (FSV) 24.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Iron Mountain (IRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Aramark (ARMK) +11.0%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.4%, FirstService (FSV) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest net margin (Aramark (ARMK) 1.9%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 5.5%, FirstService (FSV) 2.0%). On return on invested capital, FirstService (FSV) leads (Aramark (ARMK) 6.8%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 7.6%, FirstService (FSV) 10.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Aramark (ARMK) returned the most: Aramark (ARMK) +31.8%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +5.8%, FirstService (FSV) -13.8%. Over five years, Iron Mountain (IRM) compounded fastest (Aramark (ARMK) +7.5%/yr, Iron Mountain (IRM) +19.1%/yr, FirstService (FSV) -6.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest dividend yield: Aramark (ARMK) 0.01%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 0.03%, FirstService (FSV) 0.00%. FirstService (FSV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Aramark (ARMK) has been the steadiest (Aramark (ARMK) 26.4%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 33.1%, FirstService (FSV) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ARMK, IRM and FSV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Iron Mountain (IRM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.