ARHS vs MLKN vs MBC Stock Comparison

Arhaus, Millerknoll and MasterBrand Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ARHS Arhaus, Inc.
$11.65 +20.0% 1M +11.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.64B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.41B
Div. yield
–
Furniture Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
MLKN Millerknoll, Inc.
$21.07 +5.0% 1M +20.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.45B
P/E
14.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.81B
Div. yield
–
Furniture Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
MBC MasterBrand, Inc.
$6.68 -7.7% 1M -47.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.05B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.78B
Div. yield
–
Furniture Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Millerknoll leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Millerknoll 7, Arhaus 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionARHSMLKNMBCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.64B $1.45B $1.05B ARHS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.7x 14.8x -10.8x MLKN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.8x 10.0x — MLKN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.4% +1.2% 0.0% ARHS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% 2.6% -3.5% ARHS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.6% -1.0% MLKN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.7x 16.8x MLKN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.4% +20.7% -47.8% MLKN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -11.0%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.0% 48.9% 55.4% MLKN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 62/100 30/100 MLKN

Percentile Scorecard

ARHSMLKNMBC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisARHSMLKNMBC
Valuation 46 #23 of 42 83 #8 of 42 61 #17 of 42
Growth 32 #29 of 42 71 #13 of 42 12 #37 of 42
Profitability 74 #11 of 40 64 #15 of 40 23 #31 of 40
Financial Health 26 #32 of 43 31 #30 of 43 24 #33 of 43
Shareholder Returns 52 #14 of 28 59 #12 of 28 –
Overall 46 62 30
  • ARHS ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • MLKN ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables
  • MBC ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodARHSMLKNMBCSPY
1 month +20.0%+5.0%-7.7% -0.8%
3 months +47.8%-6.6%-23.7% +3.5%
6 months +54.7%+22.7%-28.5% +7.0%
Year to date +3.9%+15.3%-39.5% +12.2%
1 year +11.4%+20.7%-47.8% +13.0%
3 years +41.2%-6.8%-39.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +12.2%-2.3%-15.3% +23.1%
5 years —-44.1%— +68.6%
5 years, per year —-11.0%— +11.0%
10 years —-25.2%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-2.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureARHSMLKNMBCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.0%48.9%55.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.4%53.8%56.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.561.231.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.200.42-0.86 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.8%-67.8%-66.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.9%-14.0%-51.7% -1.8%
52-week high $11.87$24.49$13.82 $779.14
52-week low $5.75$13.88$6.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleARHSMLKNMBC
P/E now vs peer median 23.8xmedian 16.1x 14.9xmedian 16.1x -10.6xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.7x 0.4xmedian 0.7x 0.4xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 12.1x 6.2xmedian 12.1x 31.8xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 40.3xmedian 11.9x 12.5xmedian 11.9x 13.8xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.0xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x 0.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.98median 0.64 0.31median 0.64 0.29median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsARHSMLKNMBC
Revenue $1.41B $3.81B $2.78B
Gross profit $559.10M $1.51B $747.80M
Operating income $93.10M $196.60M -$31.70M
Net income $69.18M $101.20M -$96.90M
Free cash flow $40.86M $115.50M $74.40M
R&D – $105.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.49 $1.40 $-0.63
Cash & equivalents $226.40M $178.60M $241.60M
Total debt – $1.31B $1.39B
Shares (diluted) 141.81M 70.04M 153.60M
Enterprise value $719.08M $746.84M $369.45M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricARHSMLKNMBC
P/E 23.8x 14.9x -10.6x
P/FCF 40.3x 12.5x 13.8x
P/Operating cash flow 14.3x 6.0x 6.9x
P/S 1.2x 0.4x 0.4x
P/B 4.0x 1.1x 0.5x
P/Tangible book 4.0x 1.6x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA 8.0x 6.2x 31.8x
EV/EBIT 15.3x 13.1x -68.6x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 0.7x 0.8x
EV/FCF 34.8x 22.3x 29.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.3x 10.8x 14.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.98 0.31 0.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricARHSMLKNMBC
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.4% 1.2% 0.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.9% -1.0% -2.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.4% 3.5% -15.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.2% 2.1% -6.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.8% 121.4% -115.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -23.9% 20.7% -28.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -2.8% 681.6% -203.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -24.1% 44.0% -38.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -3.2% 724.0% -186.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -24.4% 47.5% -36.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -20.1% 21.3% -40.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.9% -12.6% -25.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -28.8% 41.0% -53.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.8% -24.9% -37.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricARHSMLKNMBC
Gross margin 39.7% 39.5% 26.9%
EBITDA margin 12.6% 10.9% 2.5%
Operating margin 6.6% 5.2% -1.1%
Pretax margin 6.9% 3.5% -3.8%
Net margin 4.9% 2.6% -3.5%
FCF margin 2.9% 3.0% 2.7%
Operating cash flow margin 8.2% 6.3% 5.3%
Return on equity 17.6% 7.6% -5.9%
Return on assets 4.9% 2.6% -2.6%
Return on invested capital – 5.6% -1.0%
Return on capital employed 10.0% 5.9% -1.0%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 2.4x -1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.7% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricARHSMLKNMBC
Debt / assets – 32.7% 31.0%
Debt / equity – 1.0x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.7x 16.8x
Debt / FCF – 11.3x 18.7x
Liabilities / assets 71.4% 66.1% 56.1%
Equity / assets 28.6% 33.9% 43.9%
Interest coverage – 2.9x -0.4x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.6x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.8x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.46 1.83 1.37

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricARHSMLKNMBC
Dividend yield 3.0% 3.6% –
Net buyback yield – 0.7% –
Shareholder yield 3.0% 4.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusARHSMLKNMBC
Forward P/E 22.8xFY2026 10.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.51FY2026 $2.10FY2026 $-0.04FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.3%FY2026 +12.9%FY2026 -104.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.6% +11.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.41BFY2026 $3.72BFY2026 $3.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.4%FY2026 -3.2%FY2026 +21.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.0% +17.4% +22.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersARHSMLKNMBC
Held by institutions 38.0% 96.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 164 244 345
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.6% -0.5% +39.7%
Institutions buying 86 121 222
Institutions selling 60 86 53
Buyers to sellers 1.43 1.41 4.19

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ARHSMLKNMBC
ARHS 1.00 0.42 0.52
MLKN 0.42 1.00 0.47
MBC 0.52 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ARHS, MLKN and MBC?

Arhaus (ARHS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Arhaus (ARHS) $1.64B, Millerknoll (MLKN) $1.45B, MasterBrand (MBC) $1.05B.

Which stock is cheaper, ARHS, MLKN and MBC?

Millerknoll (MLKN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Arhaus (ARHS) 23.7x, Millerknoll (MLKN) 14.8x, MasterBrand (MBC) -10.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Millerknoll (MLKN) is cheapest (Arhaus (ARHS) 22.8x, Millerknoll (MLKN) 10.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Arhaus (ARHS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Arhaus (ARHS) +5.4%, Millerknoll (MLKN) +1.2%, MasterBrand (MBC) 0.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Arhaus (ARHS) has the highest net margin (Arhaus (ARHS) 4.9%, Millerknoll (MLKN) 2.6%, MasterBrand (MBC) -3.5%). On return on invested capital, Millerknoll (MLKN) leads (Millerknoll (MLKN) 5.6%, MasterBrand (MBC) -1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Millerknoll (MLKN) returned the most: Arhaus (ARHS) +11.4%, Millerknoll (MLKN) +20.7%, MasterBrand (MBC) -47.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Millerknoll (MLKN) has been the steadiest (Arhaus (ARHS) 57.0%, Millerknoll (MLKN) 48.9%, MasterBrand (MBC) 55.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ARHS, MLKN and MBC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Millerknoll (MLKN) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.