APG vs MAGH vs PWR Stock Comparison

APi, Magnitude International and Quanta Services Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
APG APi Group Corp
$40.80 +6.1% 1M +17.7% 1Y
Market cap
$17.63B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$8.44B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$578.87 -10.8% 1M +31.0% 1Y
Market cap
$86.99B
P/E
65.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$32.91B
Div. yield
0.08%
Utility Construction Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Quanta Services leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Quanta Services 7, APi 2, Magnitude International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAPGMAGHPWRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.63B $236.60M $86.99B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -71.2x -127.4x 65.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.1x — 36.5x APG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.1% — +26.3% PWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.9% — 4.0% PWR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.7% — 10.1% PWR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x — 1.8x PWR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.08% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.7% +293.0% +31.0% MAGH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.1%/yr — +36.7%/yr PWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.0% 62.1% 44.8% APG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 — 53/100 PWR

Percentile Scorecard

APGMAGHPWR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAPGMAGHPWR
Valuation 27 #82 of 112 8 #48 of 52 22 #41 of 52
Growth 76 #24 of 96 – 72 #11 of 37
Profitability 54 #42 of 91 – 75 #10 of 37
Financial Health 46 #68 of 125 57 #25 of 57 55 #26 of 57
Shareholder Returns 17 #56 of 67 – 42 #16 of 27
Overall 44 – 53
  • APG ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • MAGH ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAPGMAGHPWRSPY
1 month +6.1%0.0%-10.8% -0.2%
3 months +3.7%0.0%-1.6% +3.9%
6 months -16.2%0.0%-8.3% +8.2%
Year to date +6.6%0.0%+37.2% +12.9%
1 year +17.7%+293.0%+31.0% +12.3%
3 years +140.4%—+251.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +34.0%—+52.0% +23.3%
5 years +182.4%—+376.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year +23.1%—+36.7% +10.9%
10 years ——+1,953.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+35.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAPGMAGHPWRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.0%62.1%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.0%61.9%42.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.28-0.531.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.594.720.69 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.6%-74.9%-33.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.4%0.0%-26.3% -1.2%
52-week high $49.40$6.76$785.24 $779.14
52-week low $34.31$1.37$413.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAPGMAGHPWR
P/E now vs peer median -71.2xmedian 21.2x -127.4xmedian 26.7x 65.5xmedian 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 0.9x 15.8xmedian 0.8x 2.6xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.5xmedian 11.9x —median 13.1x 30.2xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.1xmedian 13.7x -155.2xmedian 23.0x 38.0xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 2.4x 61.0xmedian 2.4x 8.9xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.02median 1.00 —median 0.57 2.13median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAPGMAGHPWR
Revenue $8.44B – $32.91B
Gross profit $2.65B – $5.09B
Operating income $605.00M – $2.04B
Net income $346.00M – $1.35B
Free cash flow $676.00M – $2.29B
EPS (diluted) $-0.57 – $8.70
Cash & equivalents $851.00M $890.32K $506.43M
Total debt $3.52B $1.59M $6.10B
Shares (diluted) 437.00M 34.53M 152.44M
Enterprise value $14.67B $231.66M $85.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAPGMAGHPWR
P/E -71.2x -127.4x 65.5x
P/FCF 26.1x -155.2x 38.0x
P/Operating cash flow 22.5x – 27.4x
P/S 2.1x 15.8x 2.6x
P/B 5.0x 61.0x 8.9x
P/Tangible book 9.9x 61.0x 13.3x
EV/EBITDA 21.5x – 30.2x
EV/EBIT 33.6x – 45.5x
EV/Revenue 2.4x – 2.8x
EV/FCF 30.0x – 40.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.0x – 29.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.02 – 2.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAPGMAGHPWR
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.1% – 26.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.3% – 21.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.4% – 29.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.3% – 24.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.7% – 36.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.8% – 28.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 39.5% – 36.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 40.8% – 31.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -272.3% – 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -69.5% – 30.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.7% – 59.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 24.3% – 42.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.8% – 68.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.9% – 47.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAPGMAGHPWR
Gross margin 31.4% – 15.5%
EBITDA margin 11.2% – 9.3%
Operating margin 7.2% – 6.2%
Pretax margin 5.5% – 5.3%
Net margin -2.9% – 4.0%
FCF margin 8.0% – 7.0%
Operating cash flow margin 9.3% – 9.7%
Return on equity 9.9% – 14.3%
Return on assets 3.7% – 5.0%
Return on invested capital 6.7% – 10.1%
Return on capital employed 8.7% – 12.6%
Asset turnover 0.9x – 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x – 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAPGMAGHPWR
Debt / assets 35.4% 15.4% 21.6%
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.4x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x – 1.8x
Debt / FCF 5.2x – 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 64.7% 62.5% 65.6%
Equity / assets 35.3% 37.5% 34.4%
Interest coverage 4.3x – 6.9x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.8x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.8x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 2.91 – 4.62

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAPGMAGHPWR
Dividend yield – – 0.1%
Net buyback yield 0.4% – –
Shareholder yield 0.4% – 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 4.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 2.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 10.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 12.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAPGMAGHPWR
Forward P/E 24.1xFY2026 – 36.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.69FY2026 – $15.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.2%FY2026 – +47.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.0% – +27.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.25BFY2026 – $40.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 – +43.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.4% – +9.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAPGMAGHPWR
Held by institutions 84.5% – 88.9%
Institutions holding 581 – 1,920
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.1% – +13.5%
Institutions buying 306 – 972
Institutions selling 205 – 704
Buyers to sellers 1.49 – 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

APGMAGHPWR
APG 1.00 -0.02 0.47
MAGH -0.02 1.00 -0.05
PWR 0.47 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, APG, MAGH and PWR?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: APi (APG) $17.63B, Magnitude International (MAGH) $236.60M, Quanta Services (PWR) $86.99B.

Which company is growing faster?

Quanta Services (PWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: APi (APG) +14.1%, Quanta Services (PWR) +26.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Quanta Services (PWR) has the highest net margin (APi (APG) -2.9%, Quanta Services (PWR) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, Quanta Services (PWR) leads (APi (APG) 6.7%, Quanta Services (PWR) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Magnitude International (MAGH) returned the most: APi (APG) +17.7%, Magnitude International (MAGH) +293.0%, Quanta Services (PWR) +31.0%. Over five years, Quanta Services (PWR) compounded fastest (APi (APG) +23.1%/yr, Quanta Services (PWR) +36.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Quanta Services (PWR) 0.08%. APi (APG) and Magnitude International (MAGH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, APi (APG) has been the steadiest (APi (APG) 30.0%, Magnitude International (MAGH) 62.1%, Quanta Services (PWR) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, APG, MAGH and PWR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Quanta Services (PWR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.