APG vs IRM vs PWR Stock Comparison

APi, Iron Mountain and Quanta Services Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
APG APi Group Corp
$40.27 +4.7% 1M +15.8% 1Y
Market cap
$17.55B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$8.44B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins
IRM Iron Mountain Inc
$113.08 +1.5% 1M +7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$34.35B
P/E
82.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.56B
Div. yield
0.03%
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$564.03 -13.1% 1M +27.9% 1Y
Market cap
$86.91B
P/E
65.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$32.91B
Div. yield
0.00%
Utility Construction Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Quanta Services leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Quanta Services 8, APi 2, Iron Mountain 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAPGIRMPWRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.55B $34.35B $86.91B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -70.8x 82.0x 65.5x PWR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.8x 48.7x 35.5x APG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.1% +17.4% +26.3% PWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.9% 5.5% 4.0% IRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.7% 7.6% 10.1% PWR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x 6.7x 1.8x PWR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% IRM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.8% +7.5% +27.9% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.1%/yr +19.9%/yr +37.1%/yr PWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.1% 33.3% 44.8% APG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 47/100 52/100 PWR

Percentile Scorecard

APGIRMPWR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAPGIRMPWR
Valuation 28 #81 of 112 21 #89 of 112 22 #41 of 52
Growth 76 #24 of 96 90 #11 of 96 72 #11 of 37
Profitability 54 #42 of 91 64 #33 of 91 72 #11 of 37
Financial Health 46 #68 of 125 8 #115 of 125 50 #29 of 57
Shareholder Returns 17 #56 of 67 50 #34 of 67 42 #16 of 27
Overall 44 47 52
  • APG ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • IRM ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAPGIRMPWRSPY
1 month +4.7%+1.5%-13.1% -0.8%
3 months +0.9%-10.9%-9.1% +3.5%
6 months -18.5%+0.3%-11.5% +7.0%
Year to date +5.3%+36.3%+33.6% +12.2%
1 year +15.8%+7.5%+27.9% +13.0%
3 years +137.3%+94.2%+242.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +33.4%+24.8%+50.7% +23.1%
5 years +182.2%+147.7%+384.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +23.1%+19.9%+37.1% +11.0%
10 years —+232.5%+1,884.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+12.8%+34.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAPGIRMPWRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.1%33.3%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.0%34.4%42.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.281.161.72 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.530.220.62 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.6%-40.0%-33.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.5%-15.0%-28.2% -1.8%
52-week high $49.40$133.06$785.24 $779.14
52-week low $34.31$78.86$413.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAPGIRMPWR
P/E now vs peer median -70.3xmedian 21.9x 80.4xmedian 21.9x 63.9xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 0.9x 4.5xmedian 0.9x 2.6xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.3xmedian 12.2x 20.0xmedian 12.2x 29.5xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 14.3x -68.6xmedian 14.3x 37.0xmedian 22.5x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 2.3x -26.3xmedian 2.3x 8.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.01median 1.02 30.78median 1.02 2.08median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAPGIRMPWR
Revenue $8.44B $7.56B $32.91B
Gross profit $2.65B $4.10B $5.09B
Operating income $605.00M $1.42B $2.04B
Net income $346.00M $434.46M $1.35B
Free cash flow $676.00M -$490.92M $2.29B
EPS (diluted) $-0.57 $1.40 $8.70
Cash & equivalents $851.00M $204.79M $506.43M
Total debt $3.52B $17.35B $6.10B
Shares (diluted) 437.00M 299.85M 152.44M
Enterprise value $14.59B $33.54B $84.99B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAPGIRMPWR
P/E -70.3x 80.4x 63.9x
P/FCF 25.7x -68.6x 37.0x
P/Operating cash flow 22.3x 20.3x 26.7x
P/S 2.1x 4.5x 2.6x
P/B 4.9x -26.3x 8.7x
P/Tangible book 9.8x -13.4x 13.0x
EV/EBITDA 21.3x 20.0x 29.5x
EV/EBIT 33.2x 35.8x 44.4x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 6.7x 2.7x
EV/FCF 29.7x -103.5x 39.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 25.7x 30.7x 28.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.01 30.78 2.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAPGIRMPWR
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.1% 17.4% 26.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 13.0% 21.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.4% 13.5% 29.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.3% 11.1% 24.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.7% 35.4% 36.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 12.8% 28.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 39.5% 867.3% 36.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 40.8% 4.1% 31.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -272.3% 897.5% 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -69.5% 2.6% 30.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.7% 31.7% 59.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 24.3% 17.2% 42.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.8% 50.3% 68.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.9% -60.8% 47.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAPGIRMPWR
Gross margin 31.4% 54.2% 15.5%
EBITDA margin 11.2% 33.6% 9.3%
Operating margin 7.2% 18.8% 6.2%
Pretax margin 5.5% 6.7% 5.3%
Net margin -2.9% 5.5% 4.0%
FCF margin 8.0% -6.5% 7.0%
Operating cash flow margin 9.3% 21.9% 9.7%
Return on equity 9.9% – 14.3%
Return on assets 3.7% 2.0% 5.0%
Return on invested capital 6.7% 7.6% 10.1%
Return on capital employed 8.7% 7.5% 12.6%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.3x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 3.8x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 1.8% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAPGIRMPWR
Debt / assets 35.4% 79.0% 21.6%
Debt / equity 1.0x -13.5x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x 6.7x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 5.2x -35.3x 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 64.7% 105.8% 65.6%
Equity / assets 35.3% -5.8% 34.4%
Interest coverage 4.3x – 6.9x
Current ratio 1.4x 0.7x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 2.89 1.75 4.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAPGIRMPWR
Dividend yield – 3.0% 0.1%
Net buyback yield 0.4% – –
Shareholder yield 0.4% 3.0% 0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 229.5% 4.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – -203.1% 2.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 16.5% 10.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 11.1% 12.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAPGIRMPWR
Forward P/E 23.8xFY2026 48.7xFY2026 35.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.69FY2026 $2.32FY2026 $15.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.2%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 +47.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.0% +28.0% +27.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.25BFY2026 $8.36BFY2026 $40.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 +43.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.4% +2.2% +9.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAPGIRMPWR
Held by institutions 84.5% 86.2% 88.9%
Institutions holding 581 1,161 1,919
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.1% +1.9% +13.5%
Institutions buying 306 598 972
Institutions selling 205 377 703
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.59 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

APGIRMPWR
APG 1.00 0.31 0.47
IRM 0.31 1.00 0.51
PWR 0.47 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, APG, IRM and PWR?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: APi (APG) $17.55B, Iron Mountain (IRM) $34.35B, Quanta Services (PWR) $86.91B.

Which stock is cheaper, APG, IRM and PWR?

Quanta Services (PWR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (APi (APG) -70.8x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 82.0x, Quanta Services (PWR) 65.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, APi (APG) is cheapest (APi (APG) 23.8x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 48.7x, Quanta Services (PWR) 35.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quanta Services (PWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: APi (APG) +14.1%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.4%, Quanta Services (PWR) +26.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest net margin (APi (APG) -2.9%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 5.5%, Quanta Services (PWR) 4.0%). On return on invested capital, Quanta Services (PWR) leads (APi (APG) 6.7%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 7.6%, Quanta Services (PWR) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: APi (APG) +15.8%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +7.5%, Quanta Services (PWR) +27.9%. Over five years, Quanta Services (PWR) compounded fastest (APi (APG) +23.1%/yr, Iron Mountain (IRM) +19.9%/yr, Quanta Services (PWR) +37.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest dividend yield: APi (APG) 0.00%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 0.03%, Quanta Services (PWR) 0.00%. APi (APG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, APi (APG) has been the steadiest (APi (APG) 30.1%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 33.3%, Quanta Services (PWR) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, APG, IRM and PWR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Quanta Services (PWR) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.