APA vs PR vs FANG Stock Comparison

Apa, Permian Resources and Diamondback Energy Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
APA APA Corp
$51.11 +20.7% 1M +124.9% 1Y
Market cap
$18.04B
P/E
10.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.61B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
4 wins
PR Permian Resources Corp
$25.51 +19.7% 1M +107.4% 1Y
Market cap
$21.29B
P/E
17.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.74B
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
4 wins
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$206.22 +11.3% 1M +46.1% 1Y
Market cap
$57.75B
P/E
39.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.10B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Diamondback Energy leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Diamondback Energy 4, Apa 4, Permian Resources 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAPAPRFANGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.04B $21.29B $57.75B FANG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.8x 17.2x 39.4x APA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.8x 11.3x 9.5x APA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -16.1% +12.8% +21.4% FANG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.5% 21.5% 8.6% PR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.8% 1.6% PR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 0.7x 1.9x PR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.02% FANG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +124.9% +107.4% +46.1% APA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.3%/yr +28.8%/yr +14.0%/yr PR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.8% 33.0% 31.9% FANG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 61/100 44/100 APA

Percentile Scorecard

APAPRFANG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAPAPRFANG
Valuation 72 #28 of 99 40 #60 of 99 47 #53 of 99
Growth 72 #28 of 97 87 #14 of 97 57 #42 of 97
Profitability 94 #7 of 96 85 #15 of 96 50 #49 of 96
Financial Health 49 #53 of 102 57 #44 of 102 37 #65 of 102
Shareholder Returns 62 #30 of 77 34 #51 of 77 29 #55 of 77
Overall 70 61 44
  • APA ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • PR ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • FANG ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAPAPRFANGSPY
1 month +20.7%+19.7%+11.3% +0.9%
3 months +39.3%+23.0%+3.6% +5.9%
6 months +26.8%+17.8%+0.4% +8.5%
Year to date +109.0%+81.8%+37.2% +13.3%
1 year +124.9%+107.4%+46.1% +12.4%
3 years +27.4%+74.2%+28.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year +8.4%+20.3%+8.8% +23.5%
5 years +95.0%+254.3%+92.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +14.3%+28.8%+14.0% +11.0%
10 years -15.8%+71.4%+119.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year -1.7%+5.5%+8.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureAPAPRFANGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.8%33.0%31.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.5%32.4%30.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.98-0.54-0.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.853.261.44 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.7%-44.3%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.5%-1.0%-3.5% -0.9%
52-week high $51.90$25.76$213.69 $779.14
52-week low $21.66$12.13$137.29 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAPAPRFANG
P/E now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 12.4x 17.3xmedian 12.4x 39.5xmedian 12.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.0x 3.7xmedian 2.0x 3.4xmedian 2.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 5.9x 5.8xmedian 5.9x 11.1xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 10.0x 19.8xmedian 10.0x 15.7xmedian 10.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.5x 1.8xmedian 1.5x 1.3xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -19.76median 0.92 10.13median 0.92 -1.12median 0.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAPAPRFANG
Revenue $8.61B $5.74B $17.10B
Gross profit $7.81B – –
Operating income $2.31B $2.06B $1.08B
Net income $1.98B $1.31B $1.63B
Free cash flow $2.11B $1.08B $3.68B
R&D $142.00M $25.50M –
EPS (diluted) $4.74 $1.44 $5.22
Cash & equivalents $444.00M $131.72M $462.00M
Total debt $17.14B $2.99B $12.61B
Shares (diluted) 354.00M 855.24M 281.20M
Enterprise value $16.31B $20.72B $56.85B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAPAPRFANG
P/E 10.8x 17.3x 39.5x
P/FCF 8.5x 19.8x 15.7x
P/Operating cash flow 4.0x 5.4x 5.7x
P/S 2.1x 3.7x 3.4x
P/B 2.3x 1.8x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 1.8x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 4.7x 5.8x 11.1x
EV/EBIT 9.2x 11.8x 64.7x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 4.2x 4.1x
EV/FCF 10.0x 22.5x 19.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.7x 6.1x 6.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -19.76 10.13 -1.12

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAPAPRFANG
Revenue growth (1Y) -16.1% 12.8% 21.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.3% 31.0% 27.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -6.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.5% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3,511% 26.7% -78.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 27.7% -39.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 54.0% -3.1% -61.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 12.8% -23.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 58.2% -5.5% -60.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -0.5% 1.7% -35.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.7% 6.1% 33.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 30.3% 17.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 33.2% 280.2% 143.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.5% 36.3% 32.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAPAPRFANG
Gross margin 90.8% – –
EBITDA margin 52.3% 72.2% 37.0%
Operating margin 26.8% 35.8% 6.3%
Pretax margin 36.1% 29.0% 10.8%
Net margin 19.5% 21.5% 8.6%
FCF margin 24.6% 18.8% 21.5%
Operating cash flow margin 52.6% 69.6% 59.3%
Return on equity 25.8% 11.2% 3.5%
Return on assets 11.0% 7.2% 2.2%
Return on invested capital – 10.8% 1.6%
Return on capital employed 14.8% 12.6% 1.7%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 3.1x 6.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAPAPRFANG
Debt / assets 20.8% 16.2% 18.0%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.2x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 0.7x 1.9x
Debt / FCF 1.8x 2.8x 3.4x
Liabilities / assets 55.8% 35.1% 37.4%
Equity / assets 44.2% 64.9% 62.6%
Interest coverage 10.6x 7.8x –
Current ratio 0.9x 0.6x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.00 2.76 1.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAPAPRFANG
Dividend yield 2.0% 2.5% 2.1%
Net buyback yield 1.3% 0.1% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 3.2% 2.6% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 17.9% – 72.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) 16.8% – 32.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) -3.0% – -6.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – -10.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAPAPRFANG
Forward P/E 7.8xFY2026 11.3xFY2026 9.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.59FY2026 $2.26FY2026 $21.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +74.8%FY2026 +76.6%FY2026 +62.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -17.0% +11.1% -5.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.94BFY2026 $6.46BFY2026 $18.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.1%FY2026 +27.5%FY2026 +38.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.3% +15.3% -7.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAPAPRFANG
Held by institutions 100.0% 91.3% 71.6%
Institutions holding 809 615 1,190
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.2% +3.4% +8.6%
Institutions buying 432 349 610
Institutions selling 244 183 393
Buyers to sellers 1.77 1.91 1.55

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

APAPRFANG
APA 1.00 0.82 0.78
PR 0.82 1.00 0.84
FANG 0.78 0.84 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, APA, PR and FANG?

Diamondback Energy (FANG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Apa (APA) $18.04B, Permian Resources (PR) $21.29B, Diamondback Energy (FANG) $57.75B.

Which stock is cheaper, APA, PR and FANG?

Apa (APA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Apa (APA) 10.8x, Permian Resources (PR) 17.2x, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 39.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Apa (APA) is cheapest (Apa (APA) 7.8x, Permian Resources (PR) 11.3x, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 9.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Diamondback Energy (FANG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Apa (APA) -16.1%, Permian Resources (PR) +12.8%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) +21.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Permian Resources (PR) has the highest net margin (Apa (APA) 19.5%, Permian Resources (PR) 21.5%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 8.6%). On return on invested capital, Permian Resources (PR) leads (Permian Resources (PR) 10.8%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 1.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Apa (APA) returned the most: Apa (APA) +124.9%, Permian Resources (PR) +107.4%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) +46.1%. Over five years, Permian Resources (PR) compounded fastest (Apa (APA) +14.3%/yr, Permian Resources (PR) +28.8%/yr, Diamondback Energy (FANG) +14.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Diamondback Energy (FANG) has the highest dividend yield: Apa (APA) 0.02%, Permian Resources (PR) 0.00%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 0.02%. Permian Resources (PR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Diamondback Energy (FANG) has been the steadiest (Apa (APA) 43.8%, Permian Resources (PR) 33.0%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 31.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, APA, PR and FANG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Diamondback Energy (FANG) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.