ANTA vs YMM vs GRAB Stock Comparison

Antalpha Platform Holding, Full Truck Alliance and Grab Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.71 -13.4% 1M -53.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.09B
P/E
19.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Antalpha Platform Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Antalpha Platform Holding 4, Full Truck Alliance 4, Grab Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionANTAYMMGRABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $37.29M $8.71B $11.09B GRAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 14.3x 19.4x ANTA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.1x 16.9x YMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +52.4% — +21.5% ANTA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.6% — 15.3% GRAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1,248,909.7% — 1.5% ANTA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -6.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -85.1% -36.0% -53.7% YMM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -11.1%/yr -27.2%/yr YMM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 88.0% 36.3% 38.7% YMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 74/100 56/100 ANTA

Percentile Scorecard

ANTAYMMGRAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisANTAYMMGRAB
Valuation 98 #3 of 99 84 #28 of 167 46 #90 of 167
Growth 95 #6 of 94 76 #38 of 153 80 #32 of 153
Profitability 100 #1 of 90 69 #48 of 153 45 #84 of 153
Financial Health 24 #80 of 105 94 #11 of 179 51 #89 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 50 #48 of 94 –
Overall 79 74 56
  • ANTA ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • YMM ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodANTAYMMGRABSPY
1 month -40.1%+2.8%-13.4% -0.8%
3 months -52.6%-10.1%-19.1% +3.5%
6 months -81.5%-3.0%-30.3% +7.0%
Year to date -80.5%-22.2%-45.7% +12.2%
1 year -85.1%-36.0%-53.7% +13.0%
3 years —+15.3%-10.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+4.9%-3.7% +23.1%
5 years —-44.4%-79.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-11.1%-27.2% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureANTAYMMGRABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 88.0%36.3%38.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 88.7%40.4%39.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.661.131.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.97-0.99-1.39 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.4%-71.8%-86.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -85.4%-37.2%-55.7% -1.8%
52-week high $11.87$13.30$6.12 $779.14
52-week low $1.73$7.54$2.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleANTAYMMGRAB
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 20.6x 14.3xmedian 17.5x 19.4xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.3x —median 1.4x 2.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 15.4x —median 14.5x 26.5xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.4x 8.7xmedian 12.1x 55.7xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.9x 1.4xmedian 1.7x 1.6xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.05 0.35median 0.41 —median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsANTAYMMGRAB
Revenue $20.72T – $3.73B
Gross profit – – $1.63B
Operating income $6.63T $620.89M $120.00M
Net income $8.34T $671.27M $525.00M
Free cash flow – $1.00B $193.00M
R&D $2.54T $145.15M $417.00M
EPS (diluted) $113,711.38 $0.58 $0.14
Cash & equivalents $4.31M $1.00B $2.86B
Total debt $268.01M – $2.99B
Shares (diluted) 24.78M 1.05B 4.21B
Enterprise value $18.14M -$2.06B -$4.03B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricANTAYMMGRAB
P/E 0.0x 14.3x 19.4x
P/FCF – 8.7x 55.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.0x 82.7x
P/S 0.0x – 2.9x
P/B 0.2x 1.4x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 0.2x 1.5x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 26.5x
EV/EBIT 0.0x 8.4x 71.9x
EV/Revenue 0.0x – 2.3x
EV/FCF – 5.2x 44.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – 5.4x 66.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.35 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricANTAYMMGRAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 52.4% – 21.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 23.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 23.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 69.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 463.1% 13.3% 340.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 90.8% 28.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 384.3% 21.4% 837.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 59.4% 35.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.7% 4.3% 82.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 40.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -82.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 34.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -76.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 40.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricANTAYMMGRAB
Gross margin – – 43.6%
EBITDA margin – – 8.7%
Operating margin 32.0% – 3.2%
Pretax margin 38.1% – 13.9%
Net margin 13.6% – 15.3%
FCF margin – – 5.2%
Operating cash flow margin – – 3.5%
Return on equity 4,215,306% 10.3% 7.9%
Return on assets 768,495% 9.3% 4.2%
Return on invested capital 1,248,910% – 1.5%
Return on capital employed 1,597,827% 10.2% 1.7%
Asset turnover 19,087x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.4x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – 6.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricANTAYMMGRAB
Debt / assets 27.9% – 15.1%
Debt / equity 1.5x – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -6.5x
Debt / FCF – – 10.5x
Liabilities / assets 80.9% 10.4% 49.7%
Equity / assets 19.1% 89.6% 50.3%
Interest coverage 0.6x – 1.1x
Current ratio 1.3x 8.0x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.0x 6.6x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 6.6x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 44,317 – -0.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricANTAYMMGRAB
Dividend yield – 2.9% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 2.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusANTAYMMGRAB
Forward P/E – 11.1xFY2026 16.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.21FY2026 $0.75FY2026 $0.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -128.0%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026 +166.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +6.7% +12.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $53.44MFY2026 $1.97BFY2026 $4.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -32.9%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +57.8% -4.1% +33.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersANTAYMMGRAB
Held by institutions 0.2% 71.1% 75.6%
Institutions holding 4 247 483
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +3.0% +0.9%
Institutions buying 2 168 231
Institutions selling 1 58 168
Buyers to sellers 2.00 2.90 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ANTAYMMGRAB
ANTA 1.00 0.16 0.13
YMM 0.16 1.00 0.36
GRAB 0.13 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ANTA, YMM and GRAB?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) $37.29M, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) $8.71B, Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.09B.

Which stock is cheaper, ANTA, YMM and GRAB?

Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) 0.0x, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 14.3x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) is cheapest (Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 11.1x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) +52.4%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) has the highest net margin (Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) 13.6%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%). On return on invested capital, Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) leads (Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) 1,248,909.7%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Full Truck Alliance (YMM) returned the most: Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) -85.1%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -36.0%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -53.7%. Over five years, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) compounded fastest (Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -11.1%/yr, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -27.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) has been the steadiest (Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) 88.0%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 36.3%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ANTA, YMM and GRAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.