ANTA vs YMM vs ATLC Stock Comparison

Antalpha Platform Holding, Full Truck Alliance and Atlanticus Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ATLC Atlanticus Holdings Corp
$87.39 -5.5% 1M +42.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.34B
P/E
9.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.65B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Finance Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Antalpha Platform Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Antalpha Platform Holding 4, Atlanticus Holdings 4, Full Truck Alliance 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionANTAYMMATLCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.85M $8.78B $1.34B YMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 14.4x 9.1x ANTA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.1x 9.1x ATLC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +52.4% — +83.7% ATLC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.6% — 5.5% ANTA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1,248,909.7% — 20.9% ANTA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -85.1% -36.0% +42.7% ATLC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -11.1%/yr +4.4%/yr ATLC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 88.0% 36.3% 51.9% YMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 74/100 67/100 ANTA

Percentile Scorecard

ANTAYMMATLC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisANTAYMMATLC
Valuation 98 #3 of 99 84 #28 of 167 89 #20 of 170
Growth 95 #6 of 94 76 #38 of 153 90 #17 of 160
Profitability 100 #1 of 90 69 #48 of 153 94 #10 of 149
Financial Health 24 #80 of 105 94 #11 of 179 25 #119 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 50 #48 of 94 35 #88 of 135
Overall 79 74 67
  • ANTA ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • YMM ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • ATLC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodANTAYMMATLCSPY
1 month -40.1%+2.8%-5.5% -0.8%
3 months -52.6%-10.1%-16.1% +3.5%
6 months -81.5%-3.0%+10.1% +7.0%
Year to date -80.5%-22.2%+30.5% +12.2%
1 year -85.1%-36.0%+42.7% +13.0%
3 years —+15.3%+205.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+4.9%+45.1% +23.1%
5 years —-44.4%+23.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-11.1%+4.4% +11.0%
10 years ——+2,404.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+38.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureANTAYMMATLCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 88.0%36.3%51.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 88.7%40.4%56.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.661.131.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.97-0.990.82 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.4%-71.8%-74.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -85.4%-37.2%-21.8% -1.8%
52-week high $11.87$13.30$111.79 $779.14
52-week low $1.73$7.54$47.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleANTAYMMATLC
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 20.6x 14.3xmedian 17.5x 9.0xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.3x —median 1.4x 0.5xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 15.4x —median 14.5x 3.6xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.4x 8.7xmedian 12.1x 1.4xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.9x 1.4xmedian 1.7x 1.9xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.05 0.35median 0.41 0.46median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsANTAYMMATLC
Revenue $20.72T – $2.65B
Gross profit – – $2.46B
Operating income $6.63T $620.89M $1.93B
Net income $8.34T $671.27M $153.50M
Free cash flow – $1.00B $936.46M
R&D $2.54T $145.15M –
EPS (diluted) $113,711.38 $0.58 $7.68
Cash & equivalents $4.31M $1.00B $555.22M
Total debt $268.01M – $25.15B
Shares (diluted) 24.78M 1.05B 19.17M
Enterprise value $17.69M -$1.99B -$816.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricANTAYMMATLC
P/E 0.0x 14.3x 9.0x
P/FCF – 8.7x 1.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.0x 1.4x
P/S 0.0x – 0.5x
P/B 0.2x 1.4x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 0.2x 1.5x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA – – 3.6x
EV/EBIT 0.0x 8.4x 3.6x
EV/Revenue 0.0x – 2.7x
EV/FCF – 5.2x 7.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 5.4x 7.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.35 0.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricANTAYMMATLC
Revenue growth (1Y) 52.4% – 83.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 34.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 86.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 34.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 463.1% 13.3% 90.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 90.8% 34.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 384.3% 21.4% 26.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 59.4% 12.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.7% 4.3% 36.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 40.4% 19.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 87.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 32.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 90.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 33.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricANTAYMMATLC
Gross margin – – 92.6%
EBITDA margin – – 74.2%
Operating margin 32.0% – 72.7%
Pretax margin 38.1% – 7.7%
Net margin 13.6% – 5.5%
FCF margin – – 35.3%
Operating cash flow margin – – 35.3%
Return on equity 4,215,306% 10.3% 22.8%
Return on assets 768,495% 9.3% 2.1%
Return on invested capital 1,248,910% – 20.9%
Return on capital employed 1,597,827% 10.2% –
Asset turnover 19,087x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.4x 6.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricANTAYMMATLC
Debt / assets 27.9% – 83.7%
Debt / equity 1.5x – 8.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.9x
Debt / FCF – – 6.7x
Liabilities / assets 80.9% 10.4% 90.6%
Equity / assets 19.1% 89.6% 9.4%
Interest coverage 0.6x – 4.3x
Current ratio 1.3x 8.0x –
Quick ratio 0.0x 6.6x –
Cash ratio 0.0x 6.6x –
Altman Z-score 44,317 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricANTAYMMATLC
Dividend yield – 2.9% –
Net buyback yield – – 1.0%
Shareholder yield – 2.9% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusANTAYMMATLC
Forward P/E – 11.1xFY2026 9.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.21FY2026 $0.75FY2026 $9.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -128.0%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026 +61.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +6.7% +45.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $53.44MFY2026 $1.97BFY2026 $3.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -32.9%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026 +61.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +57.8% -4.1% +13.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersANTAYMMATLC
Held by institutions 0.2% 71.1% 26.0%
Institutions holding 4 247 146
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% +3.0% +7.9%
Institutions buying 2 168 93
Institutions selling 1 58 36
Buyers to sellers 2.00 2.90 2.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ANTAYMMATLC
ANTA 1.00 0.16 0.02
YMM 0.16 1.00 0.13
ATLC 0.02 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ANTA, YMM and ATLC?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) $36.85M, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) $8.78B, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) $1.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, ANTA, YMM and ATLC?

Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) 0.0x, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 14.4x, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 9.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) is cheapest (Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 11.1x, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 9.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) +52.4%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) +83.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) has the highest net margin (Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) 13.6%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 5.5%). On return on invested capital, Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) leads (Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) 1,248,909.7%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 20.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) returned the most: Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) -85.1%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -36.0%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) +42.7%. Over five years, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) compounded fastest (Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -11.1%/yr, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) +4.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) has been the steadiest (Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) 88.0%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 36.3%, Atlanticus Holdings (ATLC) 51.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ANTA, YMM and ATLC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Antalpha Platform Holding (ANTA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.