AMTM vs MSI vs CW Stock Comparison

Amentum Holdings, Motorola Solutions and Curtiss Wright Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CW Curtiss Wright Corp
$464.99 -14.6% 1M -16.8% 1Y
Market cap
$17.57B
P/E
32.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.65B
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Motorola Solutions leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Motorola Solutions 5, Amentum Holdings 4, Curtiss Wright 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMTMMSICWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.37B $80.49B $17.57B MSI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.3x 37.7x 32.5x AMTM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.6x 26.2x 32.5x AMTM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.4% +10.3% +10.5% AMTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.4% 17.4% 14.8% MSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.1% 20.3% 14.7% MSI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 2.3x 0.6x CW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.1% +8.4% -16.8% MSI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +14.1%/yr +28.6%/yr CW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.4% 26.2% 35.9% MSI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 55/100 68/100 AMTM

Percentile Scorecard

AMTMMSICW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMTMMSICW
Valuation 100 #1 of 100 48 #53 of 100 52 #49 of 100
Growth 95 #6 of 97 45 #54 of 97 60 #39 of 97
Profitability 58 #41 of 96 99 #2 of 96 95 #6 of 96
Financial Health 25 #80 of 106 21 #84 of 106 67 #36 of 106
Shareholder Returns – 63 #25 of 65 67 #22 of 65
Overall 69 55 68
  • AMTM ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • MSI ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • CW ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMTMMSICWSPY
1 month +10.2%+4.6%-14.6% -1.0%
3 months -3.6%+15.4%-38.0% +2.9%
6 months -15.9%+10.0%-35.2% +6.4%
Year to date -25.0%+25.7%-15.7% +11.4%
1 year -6.1%+8.4%-16.8% +13.1%
3 years —+71.3%+134.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year —+19.7%+32.9% +21.5%
5 years —+93.2%+251.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year —+14.1%+28.6% +10.9%
10 years —+554.7%+455.7% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+20.7%+18.7% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureAMTMMSICWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.4%26.2%35.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.6%27.0%38.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.090.121.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.130.32-0.47 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.7%-27.9%-41.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -42.1%-1.9%-41.3% -2.5%
52-week high $37.53$491.32$792.61 $779.14
52-week low $18.12$363.83$464.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMTMMSICW
P/E now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 26.2x 37.4xmedian 26.2x 31.7xmedian 26.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.9x 6.5xmedian 2.9x 4.7xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 14.7x 24.5xmedian 14.7x 21.9xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 24.9x 29.8xmedian 24.9x 27.5xmedian 24.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.4x 29.7xmedian 2.4x 6.2xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.92 2.83median 0.92 1.54median 0.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMTMMSICW
Revenue $14.13B $12.24B $3.65B
Gross profit $1.45B $6.36B $1.38B
Operating income $596.00M $3.05B $686.21M
Net income $204.00M $2.14B $541.18M
Free cash flow $474.00M $2.68B $625.29M
R&D – $1.02B $98.16M
EPS (diluted) $0.83 $12.76 $14.58
Cash & equivalents $459.00M $710.00M $477.15M
Total debt $3.83B $36.50B $957.39M
Shares (diluted) 245.00M 167.20M 37.12M
Enterprise value $3.80B $76.84B $16.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMTMMSICW
P/E 26.0x 37.4x 31.7x
P/FCF 11.2x 29.8x 27.5x
P/Operating cash flow 10.5x 26.8x 23.8x
P/S 0.4x 6.5x 4.7x
P/B 1.1x 29.7x 6.2x
P/Tangible book 1.7x -303.3x 7.6x
EV/EBITDA 8.4x 24.5x 21.9x
EV/EBIT 14.6x 28.9x 25.7x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 7.2x 4.8x
EV/FCF 18.3x 32.9x 28.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.2x 29.6x 24.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.83 1.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMTMMSICW
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.4% 10.3% 10.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 8.2% 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.9% 11.7% 11.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.3% 11.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 60.2% 8.9% 17.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 15.4% 14.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 240.0% 0.8% 19.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 12.0% 19.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 289.1% 1.8% 22.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% 20.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 215.6% 13.9% 25.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.4% 21.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 243.5% 12.3% 24.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 21.4% 19.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMTMMSICW
Gross margin 10.2% 52.0% 37.7%
EBITDA margin 7.3% 29.4% 22.0%
Operating margin 4.2% 24.9% 18.8%
Pretax margin 1.9% 22.6% 18.9%
Net margin 1.4% 17.4% 14.8%
FCF margin 3.4% 21.9% 17.1%
Operating cash flow margin 3.6% 24.3% 19.7%
Return on equity 4.2% 81.5% 20.0%
Return on assets 1.8% 11.2% 10.1%
Return on invested capital 5.1% 20.3% 14.7%
Return on capital employed 6.6% 22.4% 17.3%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.5x 1.4x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 2.9% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMTMMSICW
Debt / assets 34.2% 46.9% 17.5%
Debt / equity 0.8x 3.4x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 2.3x 0.6x
Debt / FCF 8.1x 3.4x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 57.2% 86.0% 49.2%
Equity / assets 42.8% 14.0% 50.8%
Interest coverage – 6.9x 16.2x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.1x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.9x 0.8x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 2.01 4.28 6.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMTMMSICW
Dividend yield – 1.0% 0.2%
Net buyback yield – 1.3% 2.6%
Shareholder yield – 2.3% 2.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 35.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 28.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 11.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMTMMSICW
Forward P/E 8.6xFY2026 26.2xFY2026 32.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.52FY2026 $18.41FY2026 $14.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.5%FY2026 +19.7%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.5% +10.4% +11.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.96BFY2026 $12.12BFY2026 $4.03BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -9.9%FY2026 +3.8%FY2026 +15.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.3% +8.2% -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMTMMSICW
Held by institutions 89.7% 88.3% 85.6%
Institutions holding 463 1,466 946
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.7% +3.4% +2.8%
Institutions buying 210 639 479
Institutions selling 154 596 313
Buyers to sellers 1.36 1.07 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMTMMSICW
AMTM 1.00 0.17 0.30
MSI 0.17 1.00 0.08
CW 0.30 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMTM, MSI and CW?

Motorola Solutions (MSI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Amentum Holdings (AMTM) $5.37B, Motorola Solutions (MSI) $80.49B, Curtiss Wright (CW) $17.57B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMTM, MSI and CW?

Amentum Holdings (AMTM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Amentum Holdings (AMTM) 26.3x, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 37.7x, Curtiss Wright (CW) 32.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Amentum Holdings (AMTM) is cheapest (Amentum Holdings (AMTM) 8.6x, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 26.2x, Curtiss Wright (CW) 32.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Amentum Holdings (AMTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Amentum Holdings (AMTM) +11.4%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) +10.3%, Curtiss Wright (CW) +10.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Motorola Solutions (MSI) has the highest net margin (Amentum Holdings (AMTM) 1.4%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 17.4%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 14.8%). On return on invested capital, Motorola Solutions (MSI) leads (Amentum Holdings (AMTM) 5.1%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 20.3%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 14.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Motorola Solutions (MSI) returned the most: Amentum Holdings (AMTM) -6.1%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) +8.4%, Curtiss Wright (CW) -16.8%. Over five years, Curtiss Wright (CW) compounded fastest (Motorola Solutions (MSI) +14.1%/yr, Curtiss Wright (CW) +28.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Amentum Holdings (AMTM) 0.00%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 0.01%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 0.00%. Amentum Holdings (AMTM) and Curtiss Wright (CW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Motorola Solutions (MSI) has been the steadiest (Amentum Holdings (AMTM) 46.4%, Motorola Solutions (MSI) 26.2%, Curtiss Wright (CW) 35.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMTM, MSI and CW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Motorola Solutions (MSI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.