AMSC vs HWM vs BW Stock Comparison

American Superconductor, Howmet Aerospace and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$205.71 -10.9% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$80.00B
P/E
39.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.73B
Div. yield
0.00%
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Howmet Aerospace leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Howmet Aerospace 6, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises 3, American Superconductor 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMSCHWMBWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.23B $80.00B $604.91M HWM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 39.0x -18.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.2x 39.6x 32.6x AMSC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +22.0% +42.6% BW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 21.1% -4.0% HWM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 21.5% 14.3% HWM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.4x -2.8x BW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.5% +1.1% +38.2% BW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +8.8%/yr +47.3%/yr -7.8%/yr HWM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 85.4% 35.5% 114.6% HWM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 73/100 50/100 HWM

Percentile Scorecard

AMSCHWMBW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMSCHWMBW
Valuation – 40 #60 of 100 62 #24 of 62
Growth – 90 #11 of 96 69 #19 of 59
Profitability – 99 #2 of 95 72 #16 of 55
Financial Health 78 #17 of 72 47 #56 of 105 38 #45 of 72
Shareholder Returns – 88 #9 of 65 11 #26 of 29
Overall – 73 50
  • AMSC ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • HWM ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • BW ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMSCHWMBWSPY
1 month -3.8%-10.9%-21.6% +0.7%
3 months -4.8%-25.8%-51.8% +3.7%
6 months -47.6%-15.4%-70.9% +7.1%
Year to date -2.5%+0.3%-28.1% +12.8%
1 year -55.5%+1.1%+38.2% +11.9%
3 years +351.0%+371.8%+83.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +65.3%+67.8%+22.5% +22.8%
5 years +52.6%+592.9%-33.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +8.8%+47.3%-7.8% +10.9%
10 years +306.5%—-97.1% +262.0%
10 years, per year +15.1%—-29.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAMSCHWMBWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 85.4%35.5%114.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.5%36.5%103.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.471.093.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.650.030.33 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.9%-36.5%-97.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.5%-29.7%-79.1% -1.2%
52-week high $63.01$292.71$21.85 $779.14
52-week low $25.01$185.88$3.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMSCHWMBW
P/E now vs peer median —median 26.6x 39.9xmedian 26.9x -19.5xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.6x 8.4xmedian 3.0x 0.8xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.9x 28.2xmedian 15.0x 16.2xmedian 18.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 30.1x 42.4xmedian 27.2x -11.7xmedian 30.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.9x 14.2xmedian 2.5x 11.8xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.97 0.81median 0.93 -0.80median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMSCHWMBW
Revenue – $9.73B $821.95M
Gross profit – $3.56B $160.14M
Operating income – $2.73B $22.49M
Net income – $2.05B -$18.35M
Free cash flow – $1.93B -$58.17M
R&D – $38.00M –
EPS (diluted) – $5.13 $-0.21
Cash & equivalents $140.69M $507.00M $308.63M
Total debt – $4.83B $209.43M
Shares (diluted) 44.94M 400.00M 154.51M
Enterprise value $529.12M $75.76B $75.88M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMSCHWMBW
P/E – 39.9x -19.5x
P/FCF – 42.4x -11.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 34.1x -19.6x
P/S – 8.4x 0.8x
P/B 2.4x 14.2x 11.8x
P/Tangible book 2.5x 16.7x 15.4x
EV/EBITDA – 28.2x 16.2x
EV/EBIT – 31.6x 25.8x
EV/Revenue – 8.9x 0.7x
EV/FCF – 44.7x -10.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 35.9x -16.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.81 -0.80

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMSCHWMBW
Revenue growth (1Y) – 22.0% 42.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 14.9% 3.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 33.7% 20.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 26.3% -2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 36.4% 879.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 35.5% 17.5%
Net income growth (1Y) – 41.6% 87.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 47.5% 17.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 43.6% 87.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 49.5% 24.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 40.3% 72.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 38.8% -73.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 50.9% 57.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 41.0% -120.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMSCHWMBW
Gross margin – 36.6% 19.5%
EBITDA margin – 31.4% 4.4%
Operating margin – 28.1% 2.7%
Pretax margin – 25.8% -8.8%
Net margin – 21.1% -4.0%
FCF margin – 19.8% -7.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 24.7% -4.2%
Return on equity – 35.7% –
Return on assets – 15.5% -8.9%
Return on invested capital – 21.5% 14.3%
Return on capital employed – 24.7% 5.9%
Asset turnover – 0.7x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMSCHWMBW
Debt / assets – 36.4% 21.0%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 3.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.4x -2.8x
Debt / FCF – 2.5x -3.6x
Liabilities / assets 24.9% 56.6% 94.3%
Equity / assets 75.1% 43.4% 5.7%
Interest coverage – – 0.9x
Current ratio 2.4x 1.9x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.7x 1.1x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.2x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – 8.71 -0.88

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMSCHWMBW
Dividend yield – 0.2% –
Net buyback yield – 1.6% -56.5%
Shareholder yield – 1.8% -56.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 9.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 10.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 23.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 43.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMSCHWMBW
Forward P/E 31.2xFY2026 39.6xFY2026 32.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.90FY2026 $5.19FY2026 $0.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -75.0%FY2026 +37.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +40.0% +31.2% +221.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $383.43MFY2026 $10.37BFY2026 $1.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.2%FY2026 +25.7%FY2026 +71.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% +15.9% +35.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMSCHWMBW
Held by institutions 73.7% 91.0% 88.0%
Institutions holding 278 1,601 200
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% +0.7% +24.0%
Institutions buying 173 908 146
Institutions selling 77 484 41
Buyers to sellers 2.25 1.88 3.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMSCHWMBW
AMSC 1.00 0.19 0.30
HWM 0.19 1.00 0.19
BW 0.30 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMSC, HWM and BW?

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) is the largest by market capitalisation: American Superconductor (AMSC) $1.23B, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) $80.00B, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) $604.91M.

Which company is growing faster?

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +22.0%, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) +42.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has the highest net margin (Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 21.1%, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) -4.0%). On return on invested capital, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads (Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 21.5%, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) 14.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) returned the most: American Superconductor (AMSC) -55.5%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +1.1%, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) +38.2%. Over five years, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) compounded fastest (American Superconductor (AMSC) +8.8%/yr, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +47.3%/yr, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) -7.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: American Superconductor (AMSC) 0.00%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 0.00%, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) 0.00%. American Superconductor (AMSC) and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has been the steadiest (American Superconductor (AMSC) 85.4%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 35.5%, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises (BW) 114.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMSC, HWM and BW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.