AMRX vs FENC vs HSIC Stock Comparison

Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Fennec Pharmaceuticals and Henry Schein Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TEVA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HSIC Henry Schein Inc
$88.24 +4.8% 1M +23.2% 1Y
Market cap
$9.62B
P/E
22.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.73B
Div. yield
–
Drug Distribution Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Henry Schein leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Henry Schein 5, Amneal Pharmaceuticals 4, Fennec Pharmaceuticals 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMRXFENCHSICLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.40B $340.96M $9.62B HSIC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 40.7x -104.9x 22.8x HSIC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.6x 35.7x 15.3x HSIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.3% +77.8% +6.2% FENC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.0% -5.5% 3.1% AMRX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.4% — 7.3% AMRX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.8x — 3.2x HSIC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +75.8% +29.4% +23.2% AMRX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.2%/yr +2.1%/yr +2.0%/yr AMRX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.2% 64.5% 25.0% HSIC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 71/100 54/100 FENC

Percentile Scorecard

AMRXFENCHSIC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMRXFENCHSIC
Valuation 92 #51 of 634 81 #121 of 634 44 #15 of 26
Growth 73 #162 of 607 98 #13 of 607 29 #18 of 25
Profitability 85 #86 of 557 87 #73 of 557 79 #6 of 25
Financial Health 11 #583 of 654 57 #279 of 654 16 #22 of 26
Shareholder Returns 88 #48 of 400 30 #280 of 400 100 #1 of 17
Overall 70 71 54
  • AMRX ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • FENC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • HSIC ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMRXFENCHSICSPY
1 month -2.0%-2.5%+4.8% -1.0%
3 months +8.1%-1.6%-1.5% -0.4%
6 months +46.5%+44.2%+21.8% +4.5%
Year to date +58.3%+34.4%+16.8% +12.4%
1 year +75.8%+29.4%+23.2% +13.6%
3 years +365.0%+50.0%+41.4% +76.4%
3 years, per year +67.0%+14.5%+12.3% +20.8%
5 years +288.1%+10.7%+10.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year +31.2%+2.1%+2.0% +10.4%
10 years —+412.4%+45.3% +267.7%
10 years, per year —+17.8%+3.8% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureAMRXFENCHSICSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.2%64.5%25.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.9%61.3%25.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.641.320.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.220.460.93 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.2%-65.6%-32.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.9%-19.0%-2.9% -1.6%
52-week high $21.44$12.78$90.86 $779.14
52-week low $11.35$5.77$68.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMRXFENCHSIC
P/E now vs peer median 40.5xmedian 18.0x -110.0xmedian 18.0x 23.3xmedian 25.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 9.1x 6.1xmedian 9.1x 0.7xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 16.2x —median 16.2x 12.6xmedian 13.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 76.7xmedian 21.7x -177.7xmedian 21.7x 17.4xmedian 16.6x
P/B now vs peer median 192.9xmedian 2.2x 8.5xmedian 2.2x 2.6xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.17median 0.38 -2.01median 0.38 6.89median 1.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMRXFENCHSIC
Revenue $3.12B $59.22M $13.73B
Gross profit $1.23B $55.51M $4.34B
Operating income $453.92M -$1.13M $709.00M
Net income $215.32M -$3.25M $443.00M
Free cash flow $83.11M -$2.04M $559.00M
R&D $175.57M $216.00K –
EPS (diluted) $0.48 $-0.09 $3.74
Cash & equivalents $127.64M $41.25M –
Total debt $2.67B – $3.52B
Shares (diluted) 328.10M 36.43M 112.54M
Enterprise value $5.59B $200.80M $9.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMRXFENCHSIC
P/E 40.5x -110.0x 23.3x
P/FCF 76.7x -177.7x 17.4x
P/Operating cash flow 31.7x -177.7x 14.2x
P/S 2.0x 6.1x 0.7x
P/B 192.9x 8.5x 2.6x
P/Tangible book -11.5x 8.5x 3.4x
EV/EBITDA 13.4x – 12.6x
EV/EBIT 19.6x -285.6x 18.5x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 5.4x 1.0x
EV/FCF 107.3x -157.5x 23.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 44.4x -157.5x 19.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.17 -2.01 6.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMRXFENCHSIC
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.3% 77.8% 6.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.5% 125.3% 2.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.1% 85.4% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.9% – 3.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 20.6% 88.4% 9.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.5% 63.9% 3.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 426.4% 73.0% 7.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 139.1% 50.3% -2.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 4,481% 79.5% 15.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 237.0% 54.7% 3.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -42.8% 82.5% 28.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.4% 54.3% -4.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -69.3% 82.5% 38.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -17.3% 54.3% -4.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMRXFENCHSIC
Gross margin 39.3% 93.7% 31.6%
EBITDA margin 21.3% – 7.6%
Operating margin 14.6% -1.9% 5.2%
Pretax margin 6.5% -1.7% 4.2%
Net margin 5.0% -5.5% 3.1%
FCF margin 2.7% -3.4% 4.1%
Operating cash flow margin 6.4% -3.4% 5.0%
Return on equity – -2.7% 11.6%
Return on assets 5.9% -1.5% 3.9%
Return on invested capital 17.4% – 7.3%
Return on capital employed 16.4% -1.8% 9.0%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.8x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.6x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 12.6% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMRXFENCHSIC
Debt / assets 70.7% – 30.6%
Debt / equity 80.9x – 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.8x – 3.2x
Debt / FCF 32.1x – 6.3x
Liabilities / assets 99.1% 44.0% 66.8%
Equity / assets 0.9% 56.0% 33.2%
Interest coverage – -1.2x 4.3x
Current ratio 2.2x 5.8x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.3x 5.2x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 3.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.43 4.02 2.67

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMRXFENCHSIC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% -13.1% 6.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -13.1% 6.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMRXFENCHSIC
Forward P/E 20.6xFY2026 35.7xFY2026 15.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.97FY2026 $0.29FY2026 $5.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 – +15.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +26.8% +241.4% +8.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.24BFY2026 $75.58MFY2026 $13.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.4%FY2026 +69.3%FY2026 +1.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.4% +28.3% +4.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMRXFENCHSIC
Held by institutions 51.0% 46.6% 100.0%
Institutions holding 310 107 566
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +0.7% +2.1%
Institutions buying 182 71 245
Institutions selling 86 19 216
Buyers to sellers 2.12 3.74 1.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMRXFENCHSIC
AMRX 1.00 0.05 0.14
FENC 0.05 1.00 0.21
HSIC 0.14 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMRX, FENC and HSIC?

Henry Schein (HSIC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) $6.40B, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) $340.96M, Henry Schein (HSIC) $9.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMRX, FENC and HSIC?

Henry Schein (HSIC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) 40.7x, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) -104.9x, Henry Schein (HSIC) 22.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Henry Schein (HSIC) is cheapest (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) 20.6x, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) 35.7x, Henry Schein (HSIC) 15.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) +9.3%, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +77.8%, Henry Schein (HSIC) +6.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) has the highest net margin (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) 5.0%, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) -5.5%, Henry Schein (HSIC) 3.1%). On return on invested capital, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) leads (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) 17.4%, Henry Schein (HSIC) 7.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) returned the most: Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) +75.8%, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +29.4%, Henry Schein (HSIC) +23.2%. Over five years, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) compounded fastest (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) +31.2%/yr, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +2.1%/yr, Henry Schein (HSIC) +2.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Henry Schein (HSIC) has been the steadiest (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) 34.2%, Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) 64.5%, Henry Schein (HSIC) 25.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMRX, FENC and HSIC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Henry Schein (HSIC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.