AMR vs CNR vs BTU Stock Comparison

Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Core Natural Resources and Peabody Energy Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Core Natural Resources leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Core Natural Resources 8, Alpha Metallurgical Resources 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMRCNRBTULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.02B $4.47B $2.72B CNR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -43.9x 44.6x -14.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 18.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -12.9% +31.5% -0.7% CNR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.2% 2.3% -4.6% CNR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.9% 1.9% -4.6% CNR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 0.0x -1.0x AMR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +4.9% +10.3% -21.3% CNR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.5%/yr +25.2%/yr +10.1%/yr CNR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.7% 44.1% 54.4% CNR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 74/100 47/100 CNR

Percentile Scorecard

AMRCNRBTU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMRCNRBTU
Valuation 77 #6 of 23 86 #4 of 23 68 #8 of 23
Growth 35 #14 of 21 70 #7 of 21 25 #16 of 21
Profitability 72 #6 of 19 78 #5 of 19 61 #8 of 19
Financial Health 73 #7 of 23 46 #13 of 23 32 #16 of 23
Shareholder Returns – 89 #2 of 10 –
Overall 64 74 47
  • AMR ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • CNR ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • BTU ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMRCNRBTUSPY
1 month -9.3%+0.1%-13.4% -1.0%
3 months +14.5%+10.9%+0.4% +2.9%
6 months -12.6%+7.4%-14.0% +6.4%
Year to date -18.1%+4.1%-23.0% +11.4%
1 year +4.9%+10.3%-21.3% +13.1%
3 years -25.0%-12.0%-7.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year -9.2%-4.2%-2.5% +21.5%
5 years +153.9%+207.7%+61.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +20.5%+25.2%+10.1% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureAMRCNRBTUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.7%44.1%54.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.1%42.8%55.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.040.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.090.23-0.39 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.5%-52.2%-68.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.4%-18.6%-42.1% -2.5%
52-week high $249.65$113.23$39.50 $779.14
52-week low $137.33$76.01$20.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMRCNRBTU
P/E now vs peer median -45.2xmedian 26.9x 46.4xmedian 26.9x -15.3xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 6.7x 1.1xmedian 6.7x 0.7xmedian 6.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 11.7x 6.3xmedian 11.7x 13.5xmedian 11.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1,429xmedian 10.2x 18.8xmedian 10.2x -16.5xmedian 10.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.66median 47.24 -0.84median 47.24 0.52median 47.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMRCNRBTU
Revenue $2.07B $4.27B $4.01B
Gross profit $206.89M $740.18M –
Operating income -$44.78M $79.57M -$223.20M
Net income -$46.07M $100.13M -$172.30M
Free cash flow -$1.45M $244.11M -$169.00M
EPS (diluted) $-3.62 $1.98 $-1.50
Cash & equivalents $307.60M $473.20M $526.30M
Total debt $11.40M – $339.00M
Shares (diluted) 12.71M 50.47M 122.00M
Enterprise value $442.39M $2.70B $522.59M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMRCNRBTU
P/E -45.2x 46.4x -15.3x
P/FCF -1,429x 18.8x -16.5x
P/Operating cash flow 15.0x 8.1x 12.6x
P/S 1.0x 1.1x 0.7x
P/B 1.4x 1.2x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 1.2x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 14.4x 6.3x 13.5x
EV/EBIT -39.1x 57.4x -11.7x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 1.1x 0.6x
EV/FCF -1,204x 18.7x -15.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.6x 8.1x 11.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.66 -0.84 0.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMRCNRBTU
Revenue growth (1Y) -12.9% 31.5% -0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -15.8% 22.2% -10.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -16.4% 1.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -44.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -101.5% -2.9% -245.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -26.9% – -28.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -23.8% 385.6% -207.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.0% -48.7% -28.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -27.1% 404.0% -231.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.2% -55.1% -29.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -56.9% 43.7% -64.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -51.0% -10.2% -51.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.8% 64.6% -174.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.0% -26.3% -28.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMRCNRBTU
Gross margin 10.0% 17.3% –
EBITDA margin 5.9% 16.9% 4.8%
Operating margin -2.2% 1.9% -5.6%
Pretax margin -3.4% 0.8% -5.3%
Net margin -2.2% 2.3% -4.6%
FCF margin -0.1% 5.7% -4.2%
Operating cash flow margin 6.7% 13.2% 5.5%
Return on equity -3.1% 2.7% -4.9%
Return on assets -2.0% 1.6% -3.0%
Return on invested capital -1.9% 1.9% -4.6%
Return on capital employed -2.2% 1.5% -4.7%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.0x 5.6x -1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.2% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMRCNRBTU
Debt / assets 0.5% 7.3% 6.2%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.1x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 0.0x -1.0x
Debt / FCF -7.8x 1.8x -2.0x
Liabilities / assets 33.6% 39.3% 39.5%
Equity / assets 66.4% 60.7% 60.5%
Interest coverage -13.6x 1.8x -5.0x
Current ratio 3.4x 1.8x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.2x 1.2x 1.1x
Cash ratio 1.3x 0.6x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 4.11 2.21 1.87

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMRCNRBTU
Dividend yield – 0.4% 1.2%
Net buyback yield – 3.2% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.6% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -21.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -21.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -0.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 50.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMRCNRBTU
Forward P/E – 18.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.43FY2026 $5.12FY2026 $-0.22FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +29.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.22BFY2026 $4.42BFY2026 $4.54BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 +6.2%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.4% +9.0% +7.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMRCNRBTU
Held by institutions 87.7% 93.0% 91.8%
Institutions holding 255 355 327
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.2% +0.1% -1.6%
Institutions buying 115 207 151
Institutions selling 91 108 129
Buyers to sellers 1.26 1.92 1.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMRCNRBTU
AMR 1.00 0.70 0.72
CNR 0.70 1.00 0.79
BTU 0.72 0.79 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMR, CNR and BTU?

Core Natural Resources (CNR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) $2.02B, Core Natural Resources (CNR) $4.47B, Peabody Energy (BTU) $2.72B.

Which company is growing faster?

Core Natural Resources (CNR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -12.9%, Core Natural Resources (CNR) +31.5%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Core Natural Resources (CNR) has the highest net margin (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -2.2%, Core Natural Resources (CNR) 2.3%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -4.6%). On return on invested capital, Core Natural Resources (CNR) leads (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -1.9%, Core Natural Resources (CNR) 1.9%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Core Natural Resources (CNR) returned the most: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) +4.9%, Core Natural Resources (CNR) +10.3%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -21.3%. Over five years, Core Natural Resources (CNR) compounded fastest (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) +20.5%/yr, Core Natural Resources (CNR) +25.2%/yr, Peabody Energy (BTU) +10.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) 0.00%, Core Natural Resources (CNR) 0.00%, Peabody Energy (BTU) 0.01%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) and Core Natural Resources (CNR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Core Natural Resources (CNR) has been the steadiest (Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) 56.7%, Core Natural Resources (CNR) 44.1%, Peabody Energy (BTU) 54.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMR, CNR and BTU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Core Natural Resources (CNR) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.