AMPH vs GRML vs VTRS Stock Comparison

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Greenland Mines and Viatris Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.79 -60.5% 1M +929.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win
VTRS Viatris Inc
$18.29 +2.6% 1M +76.7% 1Y
Market cap
$21.81B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.74B
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Viatris leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Viatris 5, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals 4, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMPHGRMLVTRSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.12B $14.52M $21.81B VTRS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.2x -0.7x -53.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.2x — 7.0x VTRS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.0% — +4.4% VTRS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.8% — -2.8% AMPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.4% — -0.2% AMPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — 4.6x AMPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +3.9% +929.2% +76.7% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.8%/yr — +6.9%/yr VTRS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.3% 445.7% 32.4% VTRS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 34/100 66/100 AMPH

Percentile Scorecard

AMPHGRMLVTRS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMPHGRMLVTRS
Valuation 99 #8 of 626 13 #542 of 626 93 #42 of 626
Growth 43 #347 of 604 2 #590 of 604 47 #318 of 604
Profitability 87 #72 of 555 68 #179 of 555 81 #106 of 555
Financial Health 37 #412 of 658 78 #147 of 658 23 #510 of 658
Shareholder Returns 99 #4 of 368 7 #342 of 368 87 #49 of 368
Overall 73 34 66
  • AMPH ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • VTRS ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMPHGRMLVTRSSPY
1 month -2.5%-60.5%+2.6% -0.8%
3 months +32.8%+2,947.4%+3.7% +3.5%
6 months +17.6%+1,129.8%+23.5% +7.0%
Year to date -4.9%+1,903.5%+46.9% +12.2%
1 year +3.9%+929.2%+76.7% +13.0%
3 years -42.9%-45.8%+108.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -17.1%-18.5%+27.8% +23.1%
5 years +38.7%—+39.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +6.8%—+6.9% +11.0%
10 years +40.1%—-52.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +3.4%—-7.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAMPHGRMLVTRSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.3%445.7%32.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.4%158.9%29.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.582.770.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.072.082.37 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.0%-99.0%-52.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.4%-61.1%-2.0% -1.8%
52-week high $29.40$14.89$18.66 $779.14
52-week low $16.87$0.17$10.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMPHGRMLVTRS
P/E now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 17.1x -0.7xmedian 17.1x -51.8xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x 1.4xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x 12.3xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 18.0x -1.0xmedian 18.0x 10.7xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.1x 0.3xmedian 2.1x 1.5xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -5.53median 0.31 0.01median 0.31 1.69median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMPHGRMLVTRS
Revenue $730.02M – $14.74B
Gross profit $348.11M – $5.13B
Operating income $114.29M -$18.67M -$87.30M
Net income $78.55M -$21.77M -$410.70M
Free cash flow $152.89M -$14.22M $1.95B
R&D $94.57M $1.28M $1.02B
EPS (diluted) $1.78 $-8.60 $-0.35
Cash & equivalents $223.61M $9.34M $886.50M
Total debt $612.05M $2.07M $13.35B
Shares (diluted) 44.23M 2.53M 1.16B
Enterprise value -$24.25M -$19.35M $16.82B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMPHGRMLVTRS
P/E 14.2x -0.7x -51.8x
P/FCF 7.1x -1.0x 10.7x
P/Operating cash flow 5.9x -1.0x 9.0x
P/S 1.5x – 1.4x
P/B 1.4x 0.3x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.6x 36.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.0x – 12.3x
EV/EBIT 12.3x -0.3x -383.4x
EV/Revenue 1.9x – 2.3x
EV/FCF 9.2x -0.4x 17.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.6x -0.4x 14.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -5.53 0.01 1.69

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMPHGRMLVTRS
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.0% – 4.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.5% – -1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.4% – -0.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.0% – -6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -37.1% -127.6% 96.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -4.5% -166.2% -27.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -41.7% -91.7% 88.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -8.3% -125.4% -30.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -36.5% 48.6% 88.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -2.6% -48.2% -30.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.6% -158.2% 12.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% -236.9% -3.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 36.3% -158.2% 11.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.0% -236.9% -3.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMPHGRMLVTRS
Gross margin 47.7% – 34.8%
EBITDA margin 23.9% – 18.4%
Operating margin 15.7% – -0.6%
Pretax margin 14.0% – -4.5%
Net margin 10.8% – -2.8%
FCF margin 20.9% – 13.3%
Operating cash flow margin 25.3% – 15.8%
Return on equity 10.2% -39.8% -2.8%
Return on assets 4.6% -34.9% -1.1%
Return on invested capital 6.4% – -0.2%
Return on capital employed 8.0% -30.5% -0.3%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 0.7x -5.7x
Stock comp / revenue 4.0% – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMPHGRMLVTRS
Debt / assets 35.1% 0.5% 38.1%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.0x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – 4.6x
Debt / FCF 4.0x 0.0x 6.8x
Liabilities / assets 55.9% 10.9% 59.3%
Equity / assets 44.1% 89.1% 40.7%
Interest coverage 4.4x -2,872x -0.2x
Current ratio 2.4x 10.1x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.7x 7.7x 0.7x
Cash ratio 1.1x 7.7x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.12 – 1.13

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMPHGRMLVTRS
Dividend yield – – 2.6%
Net buyback yield 9.0% -49.5% 1.4%
Shareholder yield 9.0% -49.5% 4.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMPHGRMLVTRS
Forward P/E 8.2xFY2026 – 7.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.09FY2026 – $2.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -4.9%FY2026 – +11.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.4% – -1.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $790.23MFY2026 – $15.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.8%FY2026 – +7.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.4% – -4.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMPHGRMLVTRS
Held by institutions 64.8% 12.0% 89.9%
Institutions holding 209 47 1,028
Change in shares held, QoQ -11.7% +96.3% +5.6%
Institutions buying 96 34 486
Institutions selling 74 2 318
Buyers to sellers 1.30 17.00 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMPHGRMLVTRS
AMPH 1.00 0.02 0.35
GRML 0.02 1.00 0.08
VTRS 0.35 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMPH, GRML and VTRS?

Viatris (VTRS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) $1.12B, Greenland Mines (GRML) $14.52M, Viatris (VTRS) $21.81B.

Which company is growing faster?

Viatris (VTRS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +1.0%, Viatris (VTRS) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has the highest net margin (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 10.8%, Viatris (VTRS) -2.8%). On return on invested capital, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) leads (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 6.4%, Viatris (VTRS) -0.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +3.9%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +929.2%, Viatris (VTRS) +76.7%. Over five years, Viatris (VTRS) compounded fastest (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +6.8%/yr, Viatris (VTRS) +6.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Viatris (VTRS) has been the steadiest (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 54.3%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 445.7%, Viatris (VTRS) 32.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMPH, GRML and VTRS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Viatris (VTRS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.