AMAT vs LRCX vs ASML Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Lam Research and Asml Holding Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$387.59 -20.1% 1M +69.4% 1Y
Market cap
$315.14B
P/E
34.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins
LRCX Lam Research Corp
$237.50 -24.7% 1M +56.6% 1Y
Market cap
$301.58B
P/E
35.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
7 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,590.90 -8.8% 1M +54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$637.56B
P/E
58.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lam Research leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lam Research 7, Asml Holding 2, Applied Materials 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMATLRCXASMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $315.14B $301.58B $637.56B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.0x 35.7x 58.3x AMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.7x 23.5x 33.4x LRCX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +33.4% +22.9% LRCX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 32.3% 29.1% LRCX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% 49.6% — LRCX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x -0.4x — LRCX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +69.4% +56.6% +54.0% AMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +24.0%/yr +33.8%/yr +14.7%/yr LRCX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.6% 65.7% 46.8% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 66/100 46/100 LRCX

Percentile Scorecard

AMATLRCXASML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMATLRCXASML
Valuation 55 #43 of 95 50 #48 of 95 18 #78 of 95
Growth 48 #49 of 93 84 #16 of 93 82 #18 of 93
Profitability 89 #11 of 91 94 #6 of 91 78 #21 of 91
Financial Health 50 #51 of 101 45 #56 of 101 14 #87 of 101
Shareholder Returns 50 #38 of 75 58 #32 of 75 37 #48 of 75
Overall 58 66 46
  • AMAT ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • LRCX ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • ASML ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMATLRCXASMLSPY
1 month -20.1%-24.7%-8.8% -0.8%
3 months -25.0%-18.6%-3.9% +3.5%
6 months -4.3%-8.5%+11.1% +7.0%
Year to date +50.8%+38.7%+48.7% +12.2%
1 year +69.4%+56.6%+54.0% +13.0%
3 years +195.2%+306.7%+169.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +43.5%+59.7%+39.2% +23.1%
5 years +193.3%+329.0%+98.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year +24.0%+33.8%+14.7% +11.0%
10 years +1,243.5%+2,325.9%+1,431.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +29.7%+37.6%+31.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAMATLRCXASMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.6%65.7%46.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.2%65.0%46.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.773.252.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.150.861.15 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.4%-56.8%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.4%-45.2%-20.0% -1.8%
52-week high $723.00$433.33$1,989.44 $779.14
52-week low $220.23$139.59$966.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMATLRCXASML
P/E now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 42.1x 35.2xmedian 42.1x 56.5xmedian 42.1x
P/S now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 7.1x 11.4xmedian 7.1x 16.3xmedian 7.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.5xmedian 27.5x 29.0xmedian 27.5x —median 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 54.7xmedian 37.2x 45.4xmedian 37.2x 49.0xmedian 37.2x
P/B now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 4.2x 21.3xmedian 4.2x 26.6xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.23median 2.23 1.13median 2.23 2.34median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMATLRCXASML
Revenue $30.84B $26.13B $37.62B
Gross profit $15.23B $13.34B $19.58B
Operating income $9.14B $9.65B –
Net income $9.27B $8.45B –
Free cash flow $5.62B $6.54B –
R&D $3.97B $2.47B –
EPS (diluted) $11.58 $6.73 $28.13
Cash & equivalents $7.04B $7.44B $15.17B
Total debt $26.11B $16.44B $5.16B
Shares (diluted) 800.00M 1.26B 388.90M
Enterprise value $280.58B $277.63B $593.25B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXASML
P/E 33.2x 35.2x 56.5x
P/FCF 54.7x 45.4x 49.0x
P/Operating cash flow 36.6x 39.2x –
P/S 10.0x 11.4x 16.3x
P/B 12.0x 21.3x 26.6x
P/Tangible book 12.2x 21.3x 27.4x
EV/EBITDA 31.5x 29.0x –
EV/EBIT 33.4x 30.3x –
EV/Revenue 9.9x 11.2x 16.0x
EV/FCF 54.2x 44.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 36.3x 38.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.23 1.13 2.34

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXASML
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 33.4% 22.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 18.2% 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 38.1% 24.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 23.4% 20.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.0% 49.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 29.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 35.6% 45.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% 28.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 36.0% 47.0% 35.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 31.1% 24.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% 18.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 15.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.4% 17.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 13.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXASML
Gross margin 49.4% 51.1% 52.0%
EBITDA margin 31.4% 38.7% –
Operating margin 29.6% 37.0% –
Pretax margin 34.8% 37.2% –
Net margin 30.1% 32.3% 29.1%
FCF margin 18.2% 25.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 27.2% 29.0% –
Return on equity 37.4% 64.1% –
Return on assets 22.1% 33.9% –
Return on invested capital 25.3% 49.6% –
Return on capital employed 29.0% 54.8% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% 1.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXASML
Debt / assets 15.0% 14.2% 8.7%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF 1.2x 0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 41.1% 47.2% 61.2%
Equity / assets 58.9% 52.8% 38.8%
Interest coverage 33.0x – –
Current ratio 2.4x 2.5x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.6x 1.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.9x 1.0x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 14.10 18.98 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMATLRCXASML
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.5% 0.6%
Net buyback yield 0.6% 1.3% –
Shareholder yield 1.1% 1.7% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMATLRCXASML
Forward P/E 28.7xFY2026 23.5xFY2027 33.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.50FY2026 $10.12FY2027 $47.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.3%FY2026 +73.9%FY2027 +61.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +32.7% +12.6% +42.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.74BFY2026 $32.96BFY2027 $47.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.4%FY2026 +41.9%FY2027 +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +38.2% +25.0% +42.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMATLRCXASML
Held by institutions 83.6% 85.6% 19.8%
Institutions holding 3,504 3,130 2,488
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% +6.2% +8.0%
Institutions buying 1,789 1,695 1,356
Institutions selling 1,348 1,162 781
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.46 1.74

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMATLRCXASML
AMAT 1.00 0.91 0.81
LRCX 0.91 1.00 0.85
ASML 0.81 0.85 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMAT, LRCX and ASML?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Applied Materials (AMAT) $315.14B, Lam Research (LRCX) $301.58B, Asml Holding (ASML) $637.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMAT, LRCX and ASML?

Applied Materials (AMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Applied Materials (AMAT) 34.0x, Lam Research (LRCX) 35.7x, Asml Holding (ASML) 58.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Lam Research (LRCX) is cheapest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 28.7x, Lam Research (LRCX) 23.5x, Asml Holding (ASML) 33.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lam Research (LRCX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.4%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lam Research (LRCX) has the highest net margin (Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%, Lam Research (LRCX) 32.3%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%). On return on invested capital, Lam Research (LRCX) leads (Applied Materials (AMAT) 25.3%, Lam Research (LRCX) 49.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Materials (AMAT) returned the most: Applied Materials (AMAT) +69.4%, Lam Research (LRCX) +56.6%, Asml Holding (ASML) +54.0%. Over five years, Lam Research (LRCX) compounded fastest (Applied Materials (AMAT) +24.0%/yr, Lam Research (LRCX) +33.8%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +14.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 60.6%, Lam Research (LRCX) 65.7%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMAT, LRCX and ASML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lam Research (LRCX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.