AMAT vs EMR vs KLAC Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Emerson Electric and Kla Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$416.00 -14.5% 1M +82.7% 1Y
Market cap
$330.14B
P/E
35.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
0.48%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
7 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$167.78 +5.3% 1M +24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$93.59B
P/E
36.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.33%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$158.77 -16.1% 1M +31.6% 1Y
Market cap
$207.51B
P/E
41.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.06B
Div. yield
0.29%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Applied Materials leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Applied Materials 7, Emerson Electric 3, Kla 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMATEMRKLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $330.14B $93.59B $207.51B AMAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.6x 36.4x 41.5x AMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.8x 24.9x 28.0x EMR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +4.8% +12.2% KLAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 13.8% — AMAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% 10.9% — AMAT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 1.8x — AMAT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.48% 1.33% 0.29% EMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +82.7% +24.7% +31.6% AMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.0%/yr +11.6%/yr +33.6%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.6% 31.8% 61.5% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 45/100 43/100 AMAT

Percentile Scorecard

AMATEMRKLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMATEMRKLAC
Valuation 52 #46 of 94 33 #136 of 203 36 #61 of 94
Growth 44 #52 of 92 39 #115 of 188 54 #43 of 92
Profitability 89 #11 of 90 87 #25 of 184 92 #8 of 90
Financial Health 48 #52 of 99 30 #153 of 217 5 #94 of 99
Shareholder Returns 51 #36 of 73 37 #97 of 153 29 #52 of 73
Overall 57 45 43
  • AMAT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMATEMRKLACSPY
1 month -14.5%+5.3%-16.1% +0.9%
3 months -4.7%+15.1%-6.7% +5.9%
6 months +8.7%+22.9%-12.6% +8.5%
Year to date +61.9%+26.4%+30.7% +13.3%
1 year +82.7%+24.7%+31.6% +12.4%
3 years +216.8%+90.6%+246.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +46.9%+24.0%+51.4% +23.5%
5 years +204.4%+73.0%+325.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year +25.0%+11.6%+33.6% +11.0%
10 years +1,351.5%+235.0%+2,026.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year +30.7%+12.9%+35.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureAMATEMRKLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.6%31.8%61.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.4%33.5%65.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.781.542.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.360.780.51 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.4%-29.9%-51.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -42.5%0.0%-47.4% -0.9%
52-week high $723.00$167.78$301.71 $779.14
52-week low $220.23$123.30$109.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMATEMRKLAC
P/E now vs peer median 35.6xmedian 46.0x 36.4xmedian 25.4x 41.5xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 10.7xmedian 7.9x 5.0xmedian 1.9x 14.8xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 33.9xmedian 28.3x 17.0xmedian 14.3x —median 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 58.7xmedian 41.4x 27.0xmedian 21.8x 68.2xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 4.6x 4.6xmedian 2.2x 31.8xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 2.40median 2.30 -0.88median 1.41 2.20median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMATEMRKLAC
Revenue $30.84B $18.64B $14.06B
Gross profit $15.23B $9.91B –
Operating income $9.14B $4.68B –
Net income $9.27B $2.58B $5.02B
Free cash flow $5.62B $3.46B –
R&D $3.97B – $1.53B
EPS (diluted) $11.58 $4.59 $3.80
Cash & equivalents $7.04B $2.18B $1.53B
Total debt $26.11B $13.11B –
Shares (diluted) 800.00M 561.10M 1.32B
Enterprise value $295.58B $86.34B $207.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMATEMRKLAC
P/E 35.6x 36.4x 41.5x
P/FCF 58.7x 27.0x 68.2x
P/Operating cash flow 39.3x 23.9x 43.5x
P/S 10.7x 5.0x 14.8x
P/B 12.9x 4.6x 31.8x
P/Tangible book 13.0x 8.0x 32.9x
EV/EBITDA 33.9x 17.0x –
EV/EBIT 35.8x 22.4x –
EV/Revenue 10.6x 5.6x 14.8x
EV/FCF 58.2x 30.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 39.0x 26.7x 43.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.40 -0.88 2.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMATEMRKLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 4.8% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 7.6% 11.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 5.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 11.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.0% 9.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 13.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 35.6% -3.0% 18.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% -42.0% 17.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.0% -2.2% 18.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% -41.6% 18.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% 4.4% 12.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 10.1% 10.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.4% 4.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 9.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMATEMRKLAC
Gross margin 49.4% 53.2% –
EBITDA margin 31.4% 33.1% –
Operating margin 29.6% 25.1% –
Pretax margin 34.8% 17.6% –
Net margin 30.1% 13.8% –
FCF margin 18.2% 18.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 27.2% 21.0% 33.9%
Return on equity 37.4% 12.7% 77.9%
Return on assets 22.1% 6.1% 27.6%
Return on invested capital 25.3% 10.9% –
Return on capital employed 29.0% 14.9% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.5x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% 1.3% 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMATEMRKLAC
Debt / assets 15.0% 31.1% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 1.2x 3.8x –
Liabilities / assets 41.1% 51.7% 64.6%
Equity / assets 58.9% 48.3% 35.4%
Interest coverage 33.0x – –
Current ratio 2.4x 0.9x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.5x –
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score 14.85 4.73 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMATEMRKLAC
Dividend yield 0.5% 1.3% 0.3%
Net buyback yield 0.6% 1.0% –
Shareholder yield 1.1% 2.3% 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 47.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMATEMRKLAC
Forward P/E 30.8xFY2026 24.9xFY2026 28.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $13.50FY2026 $6.75FY2026 $5.67FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +43.3%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +32.7% +15.3% +16.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.74BFY2026 $18.13BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +15.4%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +38.2% +15.3% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMATEMRKLAC
Held by institutions 83.6% 82.1% 91.0%
Institutions holding 3,506 2,291 2,478
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% +0.9% +4.2%
Institutions buying 1,790 1,081 1,285
Institutions selling 1,349 798 982
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.35 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMATEMRKLAC
AMAT 1.00 0.47 0.88
EMR 0.47 1.00 0.49
KLAC 0.88 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMAT, EMR and KLAC?

Applied Materials (AMAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Applied Materials (AMAT) $330.14B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $93.59B, Kla (KLAC) $207.51B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMAT, EMR and KLAC?

Applied Materials (AMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Applied Materials (AMAT) 35.6x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.4x, Kla (KLAC) 41.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Emerson Electric (EMR) is cheapest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.8x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.9x, Kla (KLAC) 28.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kla (KLAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Kla (KLAC) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Applied Materials (AMAT) has the highest net margin (Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Applied Materials (AMAT) leads (Applied Materials (AMAT) 25.3%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Materials (AMAT) returned the most: Applied Materials (AMAT) +82.7%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +24.7%, Kla (KLAC) +31.6%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Applied Materials (AMAT) +25.0%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.6%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +33.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest dividend yield: Applied Materials (AMAT) 0.48%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.33%, Kla (KLAC) 0.29%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 60.6%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, Kla (KLAC) 61.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMAT, EMR and KLAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Applied Materials (AMAT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.