AMAT vs ASML vs TER Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Asml Holding and Teradyne Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$387.59 -20.1% 1M +69.4% 1Y
Market cap
$314.54B
P/E
33.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,590.90 -8.8% 1M +54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$635.50B
P/E
58.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
2 wins
TER Teradyne, Inc
$309.00 -22.4% 1M +114.2% 1Y
Market cap
$50.98B
P/E
44.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.46B
Div. yield
–
Test and Measurement Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Applied Materials leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Applied Materials 4, Teradyne 4, Asml Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMATASMLTERLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $314.54B $635.50B $50.98B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.9x 58.1x 44.3x AMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.7x 33.4x 32.0x AMAT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +22.9% +57.9% TER
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 29.1% 25.8% AMAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% — 35.3% TER
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +69.4% +54.0% +114.2% TER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +24.0%/yr +14.7%/yr +20.2%/yr AMAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.6% 46.8% 78.7% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 46/100 65/100 TER

Percentile Scorecard

AMATASMLTER

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMATASMLTER
Valuation 55 #43 of 95 18 #78 of 95 22 #87 of 111
Growth 48 #49 of 93 82 #18 of 93 89 #13 of 108
Profitability 89 #11 of 91 78 #21 of 91 93 #8 of 104
Financial Health 50 #51 of 101 14 #87 of 101 71 #34 of 115
Shareholder Returns 50 #38 of 75 37 #48 of 75 51 #40 of 81
Overall 58 46 65
  • AMAT ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • ASML ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • TER ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMATASMLTERSPY
1 month -20.1%-8.8%-22.4% -0.8%
3 months -25.0%-3.9%-7.7% +3.5%
6 months -4.3%+11.1%-23.1% +7.0%
Year to date +50.8%+48.7%+59.6% +12.2%
1 year +69.4%+54.0%+114.2% +13.0%
3 years +195.2%+169.6%+268.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +43.5%+39.2%+54.5% +23.1%
5 years +193.3%+98.6%+151.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +24.0%+14.7%+20.2% +11.0%
10 years +1,243.5%+1,431.9%+1,303.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +29.7%+31.4%+30.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAMATASMLTERSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.6%46.8%78.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.2%46.4%85.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.772.263.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.151.151.45 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.4%-56.9%-59.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.4%-20.0%-36.1% -1.8%
52-week high $723.00$1,989.44$483.84 $779.14
52-week low $220.23$966.57$144.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMATASMLTER
P/E now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 42.1x 56.5xmedian 42.1x 42.0xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 7.1x 16.3xmedian 7.1x 10.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 31.5xmedian 27.5x —median 27.5x 32.0xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 54.7xmedian 37.2x 49.0xmedian 37.2x 62.8xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 4.2x 26.6xmedian 4.2x 13.9xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.23median 2.23 2.34median 2.23 1.45median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMATASMLTER
Revenue $30.84B $37.62B $4.46B
Gross profit $15.23B $19.58B $2.64B
Operating income $9.14B – $1.35B
Net income $9.27B – $1.15B
Free cash flow $5.62B – $769.75M
R&D $3.97B – $559.87M
EPS (diluted) $11.58 $28.13 $7.29
Cash & equivalents $7.04B $15.17B $349.54M
Total debt $26.11B $5.16B –
Shares (diluted) 800.00M 388.90M 157.69M
Enterprise value $279.99B $591.18B $49.76B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMATASMLTER
P/E 33.2x 56.5x 42.0x
P/FCF 54.7x 49.0x 62.8x
P/Operating cash flow 36.6x – 45.4x
P/S 10.0x 16.3x 10.8x
P/B 12.0x 26.6x 13.9x
P/Tangible book 12.2x 27.4x 14.3x
EV/EBITDA 31.5x – 32.0x
EV/EBIT 33.4x – 35.5x
EV/Revenue 9.9x 16.0x 10.7x
EV/FCF 54.2x – 62.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 36.3x – 45.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.23 2.34 1.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMATASMLTER
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 22.9% 57.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 19.4% 16.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 24.9% 58.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 20.6% 16.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.0% – 160.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% – 28.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 35.6% – 145.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% – 27.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.0% 35.2% 149.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 24.2% 29.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% – 34.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – 19.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.4% – 38.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.0% – 18.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMATASMLTER
Gross margin 49.4% 52.0% 59.2%
EBITDA margin 31.4% – 33.5%
Operating margin 29.6% – 30.2%
Pretax margin 34.8% – 30.2%
Net margin 30.1% 29.1% 25.8%
FCF margin 18.2% – 17.2%
Operating cash flow margin 27.2% – 23.9%
Return on equity 37.4% – 35.2%
Return on assets 22.1% – 24.9%
Return on invested capital 25.3% – 35.3%
Return on capital employed 29.0% – 37.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% – 1.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMATASMLTER
Debt / assets 15.0% 8.7% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x – –
Debt / FCF 1.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 41.1% 61.2% 29.5%
Equity / assets 58.9% 38.8% 70.5%
Interest coverage 33.0x – 118.8x
Current ratio 2.4x 1.3x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.7x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 14.10 – 22.48

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMATASMLTER
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.6% 0.2%
Net buyback yield 0.6% – 1.0%
Shareholder yield 1.1% 0.6% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMATASMLTER
Forward P/E 28.7xFY2026 33.4xFY2026 32.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.50FY2026 $47.62FY2026 $9.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.3%FY2026 +61.2%FY2026 +143.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +32.7% +42.0% +25.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.74BFY2026 $47.18BFY2026 $5.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.4%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026 +57.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +38.2% +42.9% +18.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMATASMLTER
Held by institutions 83.6% 19.8% 97.3%
Institutions holding 3,504 2,488 1,419
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% +8.0% +5.2%
Institutions buying 1,789 1,356 828
Institutions selling 1,348 781 456
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.74 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMATASMLTER
AMAT 1.00 0.81 0.76
ASML 0.81 1.00 0.71
TER 0.76 0.71 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMAT, ASML and TER?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Applied Materials (AMAT) $314.54B, Asml Holding (ASML) $635.50B, Teradyne (TER) $50.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMAT, ASML and TER?

Applied Materials (AMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Applied Materials (AMAT) 33.9x, Asml Holding (ASML) 58.1x, Teradyne (TER) 44.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Applied Materials (AMAT) is cheapest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 28.7x, Asml Holding (ASML) 33.4x, Teradyne (TER) 32.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Teradyne (TER) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Teradyne (TER) +57.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Applied Materials (AMAT) has the highest net margin (Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Teradyne (TER) 25.8%). On return on invested capital, Teradyne (TER) leads (Applied Materials (AMAT) 25.3%, Teradyne (TER) 35.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Teradyne (TER) returned the most: Applied Materials (AMAT) +69.4%, Asml Holding (ASML) +54.0%, Teradyne (TER) +114.2%. Over five years, Applied Materials (AMAT) compounded fastest (Applied Materials (AMAT) +24.0%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +14.7%/yr, Teradyne (TER) +20.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 60.6%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%, Teradyne (TER) 78.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMAT, ASML and TER?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Applied Materials (AMAT) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.