AMAT vs ASML vs CAMT Stock Comparison

Applied Materials, Asml Holding and Camtek Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KLAC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AMAT Applied Materials Inc /De
$377.24 -20.5% 1M +65.1% 1Y
Market cap
$307.82B
P/E
33.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.84B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,571.80 -9.9% 1M +51.7% 1Y
Market cap
$616.92B
P/E
56.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
3 wins
CAMT Camtek Ltd
$121.16 -17.6% 1M +2.6% 1Y
Market cap
$5.64B
P/E
149.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$509.02M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Applied Materials leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Applied Materials 5, Asml Holding 3, Camtek 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAMATASMLCAMTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $307.82B $616.92B $5.64B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.2x 56.4x 149.7x AMAT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.9x 34.7x 34.7x AMAT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +22.9% +7.9% ASML
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.1% 29.1% 7.4% AMAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +65.1% +51.7% +2.6% AMAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.7%/yr +14.4%/yr +25.3%/yr CAMT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 60.4% 46.8% 71.4% ASML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 45/100 43/100 AMAT

Percentile Scorecard

AMATASMLCAMT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAMATASMLCAMT
Valuation 55 #43 of 95 18 #78 of 95 34 #63 of 95
Growth 49 #48 of 93 82 #18 of 93 32 #64 of 93
Profitability 89 #11 of 91 78 #21 of 91 53 #43 of 91
Financial Health 52 #50 of 102 13 #89 of 102 54 #48 of 102
Shareholder Returns 53 #36 of 76 36 #49 of 76 –
Overall 60 45 43
  • AMAT ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • ASML ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • CAMT ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAMATASMLCAMTSPY
1 month -20.5%-9.9%-17.6% -1.0%
3 months -29.7%-10.5%-18.0% +2.9%
6 months -9.5%+7.8%-40.3% +6.4%
Year to date +46.8%+46.9%+13.9% +11.4%
1 year +65.1%+51.7%+2.6% +13.1%
3 years +179.6%+161.6%+129.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +40.9%+37.8%+31.9% +21.5%
5 years +177.5%+96.2%+208.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year +22.7%+14.4%+25.3% +10.9%
10 years +1,226.9%+1,393.3%+3,821.0% +255.2%
10 years, per year +29.5%+31.0%+44.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureAMATASMLCAMTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 60.4%46.8%71.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.2%46.2%74.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.742.252.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.081.100.04 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.4%-56.9%-63.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -47.8%-21.0%-41.6% -2.5%
52-week high $723.00$1,989.44$207.46 $779.14
52-week low $220.23$966.57$94.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAMATASMLCAMT
P/E now vs peer median 32.3xmedian 41.5x 55.8xmedian 41.5x 147.0xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 6.9x 16.1xmedian 6.9x 10.9xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.7xmedian 27.3x —median 27.3x —median 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 53.2xmedian 35.6x 48.4xmedian 35.6x —median 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 4.2x 26.3xmedian 4.2x 7.8xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.17median 2.31 2.31median 2.31 -6.62median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAMATASMLCAMT
Revenue $30.84B $37.62B $509.02M
Gross profit $15.23B $19.58B $254.77M
Operating income $9.14B – $118.02M
Net income $9.27B – $56.14M
Free cash flow $5.62B – –
R&D $3.97B – $57.52M
EPS (diluted) $11.58 $28.13 $0.76
Cash & equivalents $7.04B $15.17B $215.23M
Total debt $26.11B $5.16B –
Shares (diluted) 800.00M 388.90M 49.37M
Enterprise value $273.26B $572.61B $4.53B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAMATASMLCAMT
P/E 32.3x 55.8x 147.0x
P/FCF 53.2x 48.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 35.7x – –
P/S 9.7x 16.1x 10.9x
P/B 11.7x 26.3x 7.8x
P/Tangible book 11.8x 27.0x 8.0x
EV/EBITDA 30.7x – –
EV/EBIT 32.5x – 44.5x
EV/Revenue 9.6x 15.8x 10.3x
EV/FCF 52.8x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 35.3x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.17 2.31 -6.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAMATASMLCAMT
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 22.9% 7.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.1% 19.4% 17.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 24.9% 7.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 20.6% 19.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.0% – -6.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% – 18.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 35.6% – -65.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% – -16.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.0% 35.2% -71.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 24.2% -22.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.0% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.6% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.0% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAMATASMLCAMT
Gross margin 49.4% 52.0% 50.1%
EBITDA margin 31.4% – –
Operating margin 29.6% – 23.2%
Pretax margin 34.8% – 9.2%
Net margin 30.1% 29.1% 7.4%
FCF margin 18.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin 27.2% – –
Return on equity 37.4% – 8.1%
Return on assets 22.1% – 4.3%
Return on invested capital 25.3% – –
Return on capital employed 29.0% – 9.9%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – –
Stock comp / revenue 2.3% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAMATASMLCAMT
Debt / assets 15.0% 8.7% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x – –
Debt / FCF 1.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 41.1% 61.2% 47.0%
Equity / assets 58.9% 38.8% 53.0%
Interest coverage 33.0x – –
Current ratio 2.4x 1.3x 7.4x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.7x 3.6x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.5x 2.4x
Altman Z-score 13.82 – 7.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAMATASMLCAMT
Dividend yield 0.5% 0.6% –
Net buyback yield 0.6% – –
Shareholder yield 1.2% 0.6% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAMATASMLCAMT
Forward P/E 27.9xFY2026 34.7xFY2026 34.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.51FY2026 $45.25FY2026 $3.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.4%FY2026 +53.2%FY2026 +7.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +32.3% +43.0% +53.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $32.74BFY2026 $47.33BFY2026 $568.63MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.4%FY2026 +21.3%FY2026 +14.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +38.0% +41.3% +42.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAMATASMLCAMT
Held by institutions 83.6% 19.8% 41.7%
Institutions holding 3,504 2,488 234
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.0% +8.0% -12.5%
Institutions buying 1,789 1,356 126
Institutions selling 1,348 781 68
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.74 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AMATASMLCAMT
AMAT 1.00 0.81 0.75
ASML 0.81 1.00 0.71
CAMT 0.75 0.71 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AMAT, ASML and CAMT?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Applied Materials (AMAT) $307.82B, Asml Holding (ASML) $616.92B, Camtek (CAMT) $5.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, AMAT, ASML and CAMT?

Applied Materials (AMAT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Applied Materials (AMAT) 33.2x, Asml Holding (ASML) 56.4x, Camtek (CAMT) 149.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Applied Materials (AMAT) is cheapest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 27.9x, Asml Holding (ASML) 34.7x, Camtek (CAMT) 34.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asml Holding (ASML) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Applied Materials (AMAT) +7.8%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Camtek (CAMT) +7.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Applied Materials (AMAT) has the highest net margin (Applied Materials (AMAT) 30.1%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Camtek (CAMT) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Applied Materials (AMAT) returned the most: Applied Materials (AMAT) +65.1%, Asml Holding (ASML) +51.7%, Camtek (CAMT) +2.6%. Over five years, Camtek (CAMT) compounded fastest (Applied Materials (AMAT) +22.7%/yr, Asml Holding (ASML) +14.4%/yr, Camtek (CAMT) +25.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Asml Holding (ASML) has been the steadiest (Applied Materials (AMAT) 60.4%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%, Camtek (CAMT) 71.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AMAT, ASML and CAMT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Applied Materials (AMAT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.