ALRTF vs PAHC vs PHG Stock Comparison

ALR Technologies SG, Phibro Animal Health and Koninklijke Philips Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$26.42 +5.8% 1M -8.5% 1Y
Market cap
$25.44B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
3.75%
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Koninklijke Philips leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Koninklijke Philips 7, Phibro Animal Health 4, ALR Technologies SG 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALRTFPAHCPHGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.91M $1.56B $25.44B PHG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.6x 15.6x 13.6x PHG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.2x 13.3x PAHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +17.1% +6.1% PAHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.6% 8.9% PHG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.2% 11.5% PAHC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x 1.8x PHG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.25% 3.75% PHG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -8.0% -8.5% ALRTF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.7%/yr +11.6%/yr -11.1%/yr PAHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 409.1% 55.5% 28.7% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 68/100 80/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

ALRTFPAHCPHG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALRTFPAHCPHG
Valuation 47 #121 of 227 92 #54 of 625 98 #6 of 227
Growth – 85 #90 of 602 95 #11 of 219
Profitability – 86 #81 of 551 95 #11 of 206
Financial Health 0 #238 of 238 26 #485 of 656 31 #165 of 238
Shareholder Returns – 54 #170 of 365 79 #29 of 134
Overall – 68 80
  • ALRTF ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • PAHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • PHG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALRTFPAHCPHGSPY
1 month 0.0%+11.4%+5.8% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%+5.5%+3.4% +3.9%
6 months 0.0%-29.3%-2.6% +8.2%
Year to date 0.0%+2.7%-2.4% +12.9%
1 year 0.0%-8.0%-8.5% +12.3%
3 years -50.0%+256.4%+42.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -20.6%+52.8%+12.6% +23.3%
5 years -66.7%+73.0%-44.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year -19.7%+11.6%-11.1% +10.9%
10 years —+49.0%-11.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+4.1%-1.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureALRTFPAHCPHGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 409.1%55.5%28.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 1,100.3%59.8%28.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -2.520.750.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.00-0.14-0.30 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.3%-57.9%-75.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-35.6%-19.7% -1.2%
52-week high $0.02$59.58$32.91 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$28.52$23.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALRTFPAHCPHG
P/E now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 29.6x 15.6xmedian 17.2x 13.6xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.9x 1.0xmedian 9.0x 1.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.4x 8.2xmedian 16.3x 8.1xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.9xmedian 22.3x 157.7xmedian 18.7x 5.9xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 2.3x 4.0xmedian 2.2x 1.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.04 0.35median 0.33 0.32median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALRTFPAHCPHG
Revenue – $1.52B $20.60B
Gross profit – $512.52M $16.03B
Operating income – $194.40M $2.65B
Net income – $99.72M $1.39B
Free cash flow – $9.87M $4.34B
R&D – – $2.00B
EPS (diluted) – $2.43 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $20.31K $61.42M $2.04B
Total debt $111.80M $2.49B $9.51B
Shares (diluted) 606.99M 40.96M 962.50M
Enterprise value $12.84M $1.24B $14.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCPHG
P/E -0.6x 15.6x 13.6x
P/FCF -6.9x 157.7x 5.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 22.6x 9.6x
P/S 0.7x 1.0x 1.2x
P/B -0.3x 4.0x 1.9x
P/Tangible book -0.3x 4.4x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA – 8.2x 8.1x
EV/EBIT – 10.8x 12.4x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 1.6x
EV/FCF – 211.9x 7.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 30.3x 12.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.35 0.32

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCPHG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 17.1% 6.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 15.8% 2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 28.1% 82.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 19.8% 6.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 76.0% 121.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 39.3% 52.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – 106.6% 293.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 45.2% 35.6%
EPS growth (1Y) – 105.2% 539.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 44.6% 42.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -13.9% 116.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 73.0% 53.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -76.4% 54.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.2% 45.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCPHG
Gross margin – 33.8% 77.8%
EBITDA margin – 16.8% 19.8%
Operating margin – 12.8% 12.9%
Pretax margin – 9.0% 11.9%
Net margin – 6.6% 8.9%
FCF margin – 0.6% 21.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 4.5% 12.9%
Return on equity – 26.7% 12.7%
Return on assets – 6.8% 5.4%
Return on invested capital – 14.2% 11.5%
Return on capital employed – 16.8% 11.8%
Asset turnover – 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.7x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCPHG
Debt / assets 68,140% 41.1% 31.2%
Debt / equity -0.8x 1.6x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 62.5x 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 84,236% 74.3% 57.1%
Equity / assets -84,136% 25.7% 42.9%
Interest coverage – 4.2x 6.2x
Current ratio – 3.0x 1.3x
Quick ratio – 1.1x 0.7x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 3.10 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCPHG
Dividend yield – 1.3% 3.7%
Net buyback yield – – -0.5%
Shareholder yield – 1.3% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 197.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALRTFPAHCPHG
Forward P/E – 11.2xFY2027 13.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.42FY2027 $1.98FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.2%FY2027 +6.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +9.6% -10.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.53BFY2027 $21.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.6%FY2027 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.2% -8.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALRTFPAHCPHG
Held by institutions – 51.5% 5.4%
Institutions holding – 208 363
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.1% +0.8%
Institutions buying – 117 266
Institutions selling – 73 76
Buyers to sellers – 1.60 3.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALRTFPAHCPHG
ALRTF 1.00 0.03 -0.13
PAHC 0.03 1.00 0.22
PHG -0.13 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALRTF, PAHC and PHG?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is the largest by market capitalisation: ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) $12.91M, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.56B, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $25.44B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALRTF, PAHC and PHG?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) -0.6x, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 15.6x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is cheapest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 11.2x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +17.1%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest net margin (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.6%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%). On return on invested capital, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 14.2%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 11.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) returned the most: ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 0.0%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -8.0%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -8.5%. Over five years, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) compounded fastest (ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) -19.7%/yr, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +11.6%/yr, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -11.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest dividend yield: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 1.25%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 3.75%. ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 409.1%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.5%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALRTF, PAHC and PHG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.