ALRTF vs PAHC vs LNTH Stock Comparison

ALR Technologies SG, Phibro Animal Health and Lantheus Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LNTH Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
$100.15 +0.4% 1M +72.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.54B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.56B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lantheus Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Lantheus Holdings 7, Phibro Animal Health 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALRTFPAHCLNTHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.91M $1.56B $6.54B LNTH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.6x 15.6x 23.7x PAHC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.2x 17.4x PAHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +17.1% +2.3% PAHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.6% 17.7% LNTH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.2% 12.5% PAHC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x -0.1x LNTH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.25% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -8.0% +72.3% LNTH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.7%/yr +11.6%/yr +34.4%/yr LNTH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 409.1% 55.5% 32.3% LNTH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 68/100 80/100 LNTH

Percentile Scorecard

ALRTFPAHCLNTH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALRTFPAHCLNTH
Valuation 47 #121 of 227 92 #54 of 625 80 #46 of 227
Growth – 85 #90 of 602 63 #82 of 219
Profitability – 86 #81 of 551 94 #13 of 206
Financial Health 0 #238 of 238 26 #485 of 656 69 #74 of 238
Shareholder Returns – 54 #170 of 365 93 #11 of 134
Overall – 68 80
  • ALRTF ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • PAHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • LNTH ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALRTFPAHCLNTHSPY
1 month 0.0%+11.4%+0.4% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%+5.5%-2.4% +3.9%
6 months 0.0%-29.3%+19.9% +8.2%
Year to date 0.0%+2.7%+50.5% +12.9%
1 year 0.0%-8.0%+72.3% +12.3%
3 years -50.0%+256.4%+49.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -20.6%+52.8%+14.4% +23.3%
5 years -66.7%+73.0%+337.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -19.7%+11.6%+34.4% +10.9%
10 years —+49.0%+1,092.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+4.1%+28.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureALRTFPAHCLNTHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 409.1%55.5%32.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 1,100.3%59.8%27.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -2.520.750.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.00-0.142.24 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.3%-57.9%-59.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-35.6%-9.7% -1.2%
52-week high $0.02$59.58$110.94 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$28.52$50.69 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALRTFPAHCLNTH
P/E now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 29.6x 15.6xmedian 17.2x 23.7xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.9x 1.0xmedian 9.0x 4.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.4x 8.2xmedian 16.3x 16.5xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.9xmedian 22.3x 157.7xmedian 18.7x 16.9xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 2.3x 4.0xmedian 2.2x 5.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.04 0.35median 0.33 0.22median 1.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALRTFPAHCLNTH
Revenue – $1.52B $1.56B
Gross profit – $512.52M $936.02M
Operating income – $194.40M $302.34M
Net income – $99.72M $275.31M
Free cash flow – $9.87M $387.83M
R&D – – $173.09M
EPS (diluted) – $2.43 $4.08
Cash & equivalents $20.31K $61.42M $593.30M
Total debt $111.80M $2.49B $571.05M
Shares (diluted) 606.99M 40.96M 67.52M
Enterprise value $12.84M $1.24B $4.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCLNTH
P/E -0.6x 15.6x 23.7x
P/FCF -6.9x 157.7x 16.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 22.6x 15.8x
P/S 0.7x 1.0x 4.2x
P/B -0.3x 4.0x 5.0x
P/Tangible book -0.3x 4.4x 10.5x
EV/EBITDA – 8.2x 16.5x
EV/EBIT – 10.8x 21.5x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 4.2x
EV/FCF – 211.9x 16.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – 30.3x 15.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.35 0.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCLNTH
Revenue growth (1Y) – 17.1% 2.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 15.8% 11.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 28.1% -3.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 19.8% 16.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 76.0% -30.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 39.3% 118.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – 106.6% 1.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 45.2% 102.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – 105.2% 5.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 44.6% 105.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -13.9% -21.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 73.0% 14.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -76.4% -10.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.2% 103.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCLNTH
Gross margin – 33.8% 60.1%
EBITDA margin – 16.8% 25.4%
Operating margin – 12.8% 19.4%
Pretax margin – 9.0% 23.3%
Net margin – 6.6% 17.7%
FCF margin – 0.6% 24.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 4.5% 26.5%
Return on equity – 26.7% 21.8%
Return on assets – 6.8% 11.6%
Return on invested capital – 14.2% 12.5%
Return on capital employed – 16.8% 14.8%
Asset turnover – 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.7x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% 5.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCLNTH
Debt / assets 68,140% 41.1% 23.6%
Debt / equity -0.8x 1.6x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x -0.1x
Debt / FCF – 62.5x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 84,236% 74.3% 45.7%
Equity / assets -84,136% 25.7% 54.3%
Interest coverage – 4.2x 15.3x
Current ratio – 3.0x 3.1x
Quick ratio – 1.1x 2.8x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 1.8x
Altman Z-score – 3.10 5.46

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCLNTH
Dividend yield – 1.3% –
Net buyback yield – – 2.9%
Shareholder yield – 1.3% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 197.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALRTFPAHCLNTH
Forward P/E – 11.2xFY2027 17.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.42FY2027 $5.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.2%FY2027 -5.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +9.6% +4.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.53BFY2027 $1.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.6%FY2027 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.2% +12.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALRTFPAHCLNTH
Held by institutions – 51.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 208 465
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.1% +3.4%
Institutions buying – 117 248
Institutions selling – 73 142
Buyers to sellers – 1.60 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALRTFPAHCLNTH
ALRTF 1.00 0.03 -0.07
PAHC 0.03 1.00 -0.05
LNTH -0.07 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALRTF, PAHC and LNTH?

Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) is the largest by market capitalisation: ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) $12.91M, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.56B, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) $6.54B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALRTF, PAHC and LNTH?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) -0.6x, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 15.6x, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 23.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is cheapest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 11.2x, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +17.1%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) +2.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) has the highest net margin (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.6%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 17.7%). On return on invested capital, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 14.2%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 12.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) returned the most: ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 0.0%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -8.0%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) +72.3%. Over five years, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) compounded fastest (ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) -19.7%/yr, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +11.6%/yr, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) +34.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 1.25%. ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) and Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) has been the steadiest (ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 409.1%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.5%, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) 32.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALRTF, PAHC and LNTH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lantheus Holdings (LNTH) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.