ALRTF vs PAHC vs CBLL Stock Comparison

ALR Technologies SG, Phibro Animal Health and Ceribell Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CBLL Ceribell, Inc.
$27.03 +14.1% 1M +109.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.03B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$101.96M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Phibro Animal Health leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Phibro Animal Health 4, Ceribell 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALRTFPAHCCBLLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.10M $1.56B $1.03B PAHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.6x 15.6x -15.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +17.1% +31.7% CBLL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 6.6% -64.7% PAHC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x 1.6x CBLL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -7.8% +109.7% CBLL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.7%/yr +12.2%/yr — PAHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 408.2% 55.6% 52.2% CBLL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 68/100 38/100 PAHC

Percentile Scorecard

ALRTFPAHCCBLL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALRTFPAHCCBLL
Valuation 46 #123 of 228 92 #53 of 626 21 #180 of 228
Growth – 85 #90 of 604 21 #175 of 221
Profitability – 85 #83 of 555 37 #132 of 208
Financial Health 0 #239 of 239 26 #487 of 658 81 #46 of 239
Shareholder Returns – 54 #171 of 368 29 #97 of 137
Overall – 68 38
  • ALRTF ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • PAHC ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • CBLL ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALRTFPAHCCBLLSPY
1 month 0.0%+13.3%+14.1% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%+10.8%+49.1% +3.5%
6 months +100.0%-30.5%+27.9% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%+4.5%+23.3% +12.2%
1 year 0.0%-7.8%+109.7% +13.0%
3 years -33.3%+262.4%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -12.7%+53.6%— +23.1%
5 years -66.7%+77.9%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -19.7%+12.2%— +11.0%
10 years —+52.2%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+4.3%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureALRTFPAHCCBLLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 408.2%55.6%52.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 1,100.3%59.9%49.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -2.500.761.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.00-0.142.10 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.3%-57.9%-63.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-34.5%-2.3% -1.8%
52-week high $0.02$59.58$27.68 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$28.52$10.92 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALRTFPAHCCBLL
P/E now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 30.6x 15.9xmedian 17.1x -15.6xmedian 30.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 3.0x 1.0xmedian 8.8x 10.1xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.5x 8.3xmedian 17.1x -13.5xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.9xmedian 23.3x 160.4xmedian 18.0x -18.9xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 2.4x 4.1xmedian 2.1x 8.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.87 0.36median 0.31 —median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALRTFPAHCCBLL
Revenue – $1.52B $101.96M
Gross profit – $512.52M $90.65M
Operating income – $194.40M -$69.97M
Net income – $99.72M -$66.00M
Free cash flow – $9.87M -$54.72M
R&D – – $22.95M
EPS (diluted) – $2.43 $-1.74
Cash & equivalents $20.31K $61.42M $32.66M
Total debt $111.80M $2.49B $19.98M
Shares (diluted) 606.99M 40.96M 38.03M
Enterprise value $9.04M $1.24B $436.22M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCCBLL
P/E -0.6x 15.9x -15.6x
P/FCF -6.9x 160.4x -18.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 23.0x -19.1x
P/S 0.7x 1.0x 10.1x
P/B -0.3x 4.1x 8.1x
P/Tangible book -0.3x 4.5x 8.1x
EV/EBITDA – 8.3x -13.5x
EV/EBIT – 10.9x -13.2x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 9.1x
EV/FCF – 214.6x -16.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 30.7x -17.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.36 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCCBLL
Revenue growth (1Y) – 17.1% 31.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 15.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 28.1% 33.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 19.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 76.0% -34.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 39.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 106.6% -33.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 45.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 105.2% -27.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 44.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -13.9% -44.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 73.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -76.4% -41.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCCBLL
Gross margin – 33.8% 88.9%
EBITDA margin – 16.8% -67.1%
Operating margin – 12.8% -68.6%
Pretax margin – 9.0% -64.7%
Net margin – 6.6% -64.7%
FCF margin – 0.6% -53.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 4.5% -53.0%
Return on equity – 26.7% -49.0%
Return on assets – 6.8% -38.3%
Return on invested capital – 14.2% –
Return on capital employed – 16.8% -45.1%
Asset turnover – 1.0x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.7x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% 16.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCCBLL
Debt / assets 68,140% 41.1% 12.0%
Debt / equity -0.8x 1.6x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x 1.6x
Debt / FCF – 62.5x -0.4x
Liabilities / assets 84,236% 74.3% 22.9%
Equity / assets -84,136% 25.7% 77.1%
Interest coverage – 4.2x -38.6x
Current ratio – 3.0x 9.2x
Quick ratio – 1.1x 8.6x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 7.5x
Altman Z-score – 3.11 14.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALRTFPAHCCBLL
Dividend yield – 1.2% –
Net buyback yield – – -0.6%
Shareholder yield – 1.2% -0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 197.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALRTFPAHCCBLL
Forward P/E – 11.4xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.42FY2027 $-1.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.2%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after – +9.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.53BFY2027 $118.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.6%FY2027 +32.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.2% +21.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALRTFPAHCCBLL
Held by institutions – 99.1% 79.9%
Institutions holding – 208 124
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.1% +2.2%
Institutions buying – 117 74
Institutions selling – 73 36
Buyers to sellers – 1.60 2.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALRTFPAHCCBLL
ALRTF 1.00 0.03 0.08
PAHC 0.03 1.00 0.03
CBLL 0.08 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALRTF, PAHC and CBLL?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) $9.10M, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.56B, Ceribell (CBLL) $1.03B.

Which company is growing faster?

Ceribell (CBLL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +17.1%, Ceribell (CBLL) +31.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has the highest net margin (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.6%, Ceribell (CBLL) -64.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ceribell (CBLL) returned the most: ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 0.0%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -7.8%, Ceribell (CBLL) +109.7%. Over five years, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) compounded fastest (ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) -19.7%/yr, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +12.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 0.00%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 0.01%, Ceribell (CBLL) 0.00%. ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) and Ceribell (CBLL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ceribell (CBLL) has been the steadiest (ALR Technologies SG (ALRTF) 408.2%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.6%, Ceribell (CBLL) 52.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALRTF, PAHC and CBLL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.