ALRM vs ZS vs FFIV Stock Comparison

Alarm.com Holdings, Zscaler and F5 Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALRM Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
$64.92 +20.7% 1M +25.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.18B
P/E
27.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
2 wins
ZS Zscaler, Inc.
$255.80 +28.3% 1M -22.2% 1Y
Market cap
$41.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
1 win
FFIV F5, Inc.
$365.53 -16.1% 1M +36.6% 1Y
Market cap
$20.77B
P/E
28.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

F5 leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (F5 3, Alarm.com Holdings 2, Zscaler 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALRMZSFFIVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.18B $41.71B $20.77B ZS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.2x -648.7x 28.7x ALRM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.6x 56.2x 21.4x FFIV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.7% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.1% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.0% -22.2% +36.6% FFIV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.1%/yr -4.3%/yr +11.6%/yr FFIV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.7% 71.1% 41.2% ALRM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

ALRMZSFFIV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALRMZSFFIV
Valuation 86 #18 of 124 15 #105 of 124 73 #34 of 124
Growth 43 #65 of 113 – 38 #70 of 113
Profitability 88 #14 of 109 – –
Financial Health 56 #56 of 127 32 #87 of 127 –
Shareholder Returns 81 #13 of 63 – –
Overall 71 – –
  • ALRM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ZS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FFIV ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALRMZSFFIVSPY
1 month +20.7%+28.3%-16.1% +0.9%
3 months +16.6%+66.4%-5.5% +5.9%
6 months +46.1%+89.9%+11.4% +8.5%
Year to date +27.2%+13.7%+43.2% +13.3%
1 year +25.0%-22.2%+36.6% +12.4%
3 years +21.6%+65.7%+144.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year +6.7%+18.3%+34.7% +23.5%
5 years -23.0%-19.8%+73.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year -5.1%-4.3%+11.6% +11.0%
10 years +121.6%—+171.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year +8.3%—+10.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureALRMZSFFIVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.7%71.1%41.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.7%82.4%46.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.430.951.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.81-0.310.89 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.9%-76.4%-47.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-23.9%-23.8% -0.9%
52-week high $64.92$336.27$479.83 $779.14
52-week low $42.13$118.05$223.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALRMZSFFIV
P/E now vs peer median 27.2xmedian 37.9x -648.7xmedian 37.9x 28.7xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 4.4x 12.4xmedian 4.4x 7.5xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.2xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 26.6x 48.9xmedian 26.6x 25.7xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.4x 16.1xmedian 3.4x 5.2xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.37median 1.24 —median 1.24 1.19median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALRMZSFFIV
Revenue $1.06B – –
Gross profit $698.22M – $2.80B
Operating income $136.10M – $818.22M
Net income $117.29M – $722.15M
Free cash flow $187.71M – –
R&D $275.86M – $621.42M
EPS (diluted) $2.11 – $12.55
Cash & equivalents $479.42M $928.35M $1.59B
Total debt $2.96B – –
Shares (diluted) 55.92M 160.22M 57.55M
Enterprise value $225.09M $27.83B $20.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALRMZSFFIV
P/E 27.2x -648.7x 28.7x
P/FCF 17.0x 48.9x 25.7x
P/Operating cash flow 16.0x – 21.6x
P/S 3.0x 12.4x 7.5x
P/B 3.7x 16.1x 5.2x
P/Tangible book 4.1x 17.5x 5.2x
EV/EBITDA 18.2x – –
EV/EBIT 23.5x – –
EV/Revenue 3.0x – –
EV/FCF 17.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 16.0x – 21.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.37 – 1.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALRMZSFFIV
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.7% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.3% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.8% – 11.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.6% – 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.3% – 6.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.6% – 20.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -8.9% – 4.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.7% – 22.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.1% – 6.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.9% – 24.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.4% – 1.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 36.7% – 13.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.0% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.1% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALRMZSFFIV
Gross margin 65.8% – –
EBITDA margin 16.5% – –
Operating margin 12.8% – –
Pretax margin 14.4% – –
Net margin 11.1% – –
FCF margin 17.7% – –
Operating cash flow margin 18.8% – –
Return on equity 13.6% – –
Return on assets 7.1% – –
Return on invested capital 7.5% – –
Return on capital employed 9.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.6x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.9% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALRMZSFFIV
Debt / assets 29.6% – –
Debt / equity 0.6x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x – –
Debt / FCF 2.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 47.8% 67.0% –
Equity / assets 52.2% 33.0% 56.7%
Interest coverage 8.6x – –
Current ratio 5.0x 1.7x 1.7x
Quick ratio 4.0x 1.6x –
Cash ratio 3.0x 1.2x –
Altman Z-score 4.27 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALRMZSFFIV
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 2.3% – –
Shareholder yield 2.3% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALRMZSFFIV
Forward P/E 21.6xFY2026 56.2xFY2027 21.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $3.00FY2026 $4.55FY2027 $17.06FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 +8.1%FY2027 +34.0%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +5.7% +27.0% +14.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.01BFY2026 $4.07BFY2027 $3.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.4%FY2026 +21.5%FY2027 +13.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.2% +19.4% +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALRMZSFFIV
Held by institutions 98.2% 51.4% 96.6%
Institutions holding 314 734 831
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% -3.9% -2.6%
Institutions buying 169 416 483
Institutions selling 106 236 240
Buyers to sellers 1.59 1.76 2.01

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALRMZSFFIV
ALRM 1.00 0.39 0.13
ZS 0.39 1.00 0.30
FFIV 0.13 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALRM, ZS and FFIV?

Zscaler (ZS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) $3.18B, Zscaler (ZS) $41.71B, F5 (FFIV) $20.77B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALRM, ZS and FFIV?

Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 27.2x, Zscaler (ZS) -648.7x, F5 (FFIV) 28.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, F5 (FFIV) is cheapest (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 21.6x, Zscaler (ZS) 56.2x, F5 (FFIV) 21.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year F5 (FFIV) returned the most: Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) +25.0%, Zscaler (ZS) -22.2%, F5 (FFIV) +36.6%. Over five years, F5 (FFIV) compounded fastest (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) -5.1%/yr, Zscaler (ZS) -4.3%/yr, F5 (FFIV) +11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) has been the steadiest (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 30.7%, Zscaler (ZS) 71.1%, F5 (FFIV) 41.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALRM, ZS and FFIV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, F5 (FFIV) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.