ALRM vs PANW vs GEN Stock Comparison

Alarm.com Holdings, Palo Alto Networks and Gen Digital Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALRM Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
$64.59 +21.0% 1M +24.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.20B
P/E
27.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins
PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc
$390.46 +4.2% 1M +79.8% 1Y
Market cap
$300.92B
P/E
980.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins
GEN Gen Digital Inc.
$24.41 +12.9% 1M -10.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.53B
P/E
13.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.08B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Palo Alto Networks leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Palo Alto Networks 4, Gen Digital 4, Alarm.com Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALRMPANWGENLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.20B $300.92B $14.53B PANW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.1x 980.2x 13.8x GEN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.5x 89.4x 8.0x GEN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.7% +24.5% +20.2% PANW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.1% 2.7% 20.7% GEN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.5% — 13.4% GEN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x — 2.9x ALRM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.8% +79.8% -10.3% PANW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.3%/yr +36.6%/yr -1.1%/yr PANW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.8% 49.6% 40.4% ALRM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 49/100 70/100 ALRM

Percentile Scorecard

ALRMPANWGEN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALRMPANWGEN
Valuation 86 #18 of 124 42 #72 of 124 89 #15 of 124
Growth 44 #64 of 113 37 #72 of 113 61 #45 of 113
Profitability 85 #17 of 110 76 #27 of 110 95 #6 of 110
Financial Health 58 #55 of 129 38 #81 of 129 15 #110 of 129
Shareholder Returns 79 #15 of 67 52 #33 of 67 92 #6 of 67
Overall 70 49 70
  • ALRM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PANW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GEN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALRMPANWGENSPY
1 month +21.0%+4.2%+12.9% -0.8%
3 months +20.5%+23.0%-8.7% +3.5%
6 months +44.0%+113.5%+28.3% +7.0%
Year to date +26.6%+112.0%-10.2% +12.2%
1 year +24.8%+79.8%-10.3% +13.0%
3 years +21.0%+227.0%+47.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +6.6%+48.5%+13.9% +23.1%
5 years -19.5%+375.4%-5.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -4.3%+36.6%-1.1% +11.0%
10 years +120.3%+1,447.0%-2.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.2%+31.5%-0.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureALRMPANWGENSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.8%49.6%40.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.7%46.9%41.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.431.250.84 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.811.61-0.26 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.9%-36.0%-49.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-7.0%-22.3% -1.8%
52-week high $64.59$419.91$31.41 $779.14
52-week low $42.13$141.67$17.89 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALRMPANWGEN
P/E now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 38.1x 952.6xmedian 38.1x 13.9xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 4.3x 27.7xmedian 4.3x 2.9xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 35.4x 147.3xmedian 35.4x 8.5xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.9xmedian 27.1x 77.4xmedian 27.1x 9.4xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 3.4x 11.6xmedian 3.4x 5.5xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.36median 1.27 -65.83median 1.27 -2.63median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALRMPANWGEN
Revenue $1.06B $11.48B $5.08B
Gross profit $698.22M $8.08B $3.96B
Operating income $136.10M $695.00M $2.12B
Net income $117.29M $307.00M $1.05B
Free cash flow $187.71M $4.11B $1.55B
R&D $275.86M $2.55B $418.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.11 $0.40 $1.75
Cash & equivalents $479.42M $2.51B $564.00M
Total debt $2.96B – $8.16B
Shares (diluted) 55.92M 764.00M 603.00M
Enterprise value $196.89M $285.99B $12.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALRMPANWGEN
P/E 27.0x 952.6x 13.9x
P/FCF 16.9x 77.4x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow 15.9x 69.9x 9.3x
P/S 3.0x 27.7x 2.9x
P/B 3.7x 11.6x 5.5x
P/Tangible book 4.1x 15.5x 24.0x
EV/EBITDA 18.1x 147.3x 8.5x
EV/EBIT 23.4x 453.5x 10.5x
EV/Revenue 3.0x 27.5x 4.4x
EV/FCF 16.9x 76.6x 14.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.0x 69.2x 14.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.36 -65.83 -2.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALRMPANWGEN
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.7% 24.5% 20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.3% 18.5% 12.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.8% 19.3% 17.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.6% 17.5% 11.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.3% -44.1% 29.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.6% 21.5% 17.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -8.9% -72.9% 76.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.7% -11.3% -7.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.1% -74.9% 82.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.9% -14.5% -5.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.4% 22.5% 14.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 36.7% 17.9% 26.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.0% 18.6% 14.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 41.1% 16.1% 26.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALRMPANWGEN
Gross margin 65.8% 70.4% 78.0%
EBITDA margin 16.5% 18.6% 51.4%
Operating margin 12.8% 6.1% 41.7%
Pretax margin 14.4% 4.7% 30.2%
Net margin 11.1% 2.7% 20.7%
FCF margin 17.7% 35.8% 30.5%
Operating cash flow margin 18.8% 39.7% 30.9%
Return on equity 13.6% 1.1% 40.0%
Return on assets 7.1% 0.6% 6.7%
Return on invested capital 7.5% – 13.4%
Return on capital employed 9.1% 1.9% 16.4%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 14.8x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 2.9% 15.5% 4.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALRMPANWGEN
Debt / assets 29.6% – 52.1%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 3.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x – 2.9x
Debt / FCF 2.6x – 5.3x
Liabilities / assets 47.8% 43.3% 83.0%
Equity / assets 52.2% 56.7% 17.0%
Interest coverage 8.6x – 3.9x
Current ratio 5.0x 0.9x 0.5x
Quick ratio 4.0x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash ratio 3.0x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.25 9.44 1.36

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALRMPANWGEN
Dividend yield – – 2.1%
Net buyback yield 2.3% -0.1% 4.1%
Shareholder yield 2.3% -0.1% 6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALRMPANWGEN
Forward P/E 21.5xFY2026 89.4xFY2027 8.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.00FY2026 $4.37FY2027 $3.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 +13.8%FY2027 +19.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.7% +16.5% +10.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.01BFY2026 $13.37BFY2027 $5.64BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.4%FY2026 +16.5%FY2027 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.2% +12.7% +8.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALRMPANWGEN
Held by institutions 98.2% 82.1% 89.1%
Institutions holding 314 2,912 688
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +6.6% +3.8%
Institutions buying 169 1,545 391
Institutions selling 106 1,125 211
Buyers to sellers 1.59 1.37 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALRMPANWGEN
ALRM 1.00 0.27 0.49
PANW 0.27 1.00 0.40
GEN 0.49 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALRM, PANW and GEN?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) $3.20B, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) $300.92B, Gen Digital (GEN) $14.53B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALRM, PANW and GEN?

Gen Digital (GEN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 27.1x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 980.2x, Gen Digital (GEN) 13.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gen Digital (GEN) is cheapest (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 21.5x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 89.4x, Gen Digital (GEN) 8.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) +8.7%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +24.5%, Gen Digital (GEN) +20.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gen Digital (GEN) has the highest net margin (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 11.1%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 2.7%, Gen Digital (GEN) 20.7%). On return on invested capital, Gen Digital (GEN) leads (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 7.5%, Gen Digital (GEN) 13.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Palo Alto Networks (PANW) returned the most: Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) +24.8%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +79.8%, Gen Digital (GEN) -10.3%. Over five years, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) compounded fastest (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) -4.3%/yr, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +36.6%/yr, Gen Digital (GEN) -1.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) has been the steadiest (Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 30.8%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 49.6%, Gen Digital (GEN) 40.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALRM, PANW and GEN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.