ALL vs ZBRA vs AFL Stock Comparison

Allstate, Zebra Technologies and Aflac Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALL Allstate Corp
$253.16 +12.2% 1M +30.2% 1Y
Market cap
$65.48B
P/E
5.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$70.14B
Div. yield
0.02%
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
6 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$386.45 +4.2% 1M +23.1% 1Y
Market cap
$18.31B
P/E
34.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
2 wins
AFL Aflac Inc
$120.50 +4.6% 1M +12.0% 1Y
Market cap
$60.96B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.07B
Div. yield
–
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Allstate leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Allstate 6, Aflac 3, Zebra Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALLZBRAAFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $65.48B $18.31B $60.96B ALL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 5.0x 34.0x 12.5x ALL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.7x 17.1x 16.6x ALL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.9% +12.7% +10.9% ZBRA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.8% 9.2% 26.9% AFL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -37.4% 10.6% -2.7% ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 2.4x — ALL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.2% +23.1% +12.0% ALL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.6%/yr -6.1%/yr +16.4%/yr AFL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 47.2% 17.6% AFL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 61/100 48/100 ALL

Percentile Scorecard

ALLZBRAAFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALLZBRAAFL
Valuation 75 #30 of 119 63 #42 of 112 14 #103 of 119
Growth 90 #13 of 117 48 #57 of 109 41 #69 of 117
Profitability 64 #43 of 117 85 #17 of 105 56 #52 of 117
Financial Health 62 #45 of 118 17 #97 of 117 39 #73 of 118
Shareholder Returns 79 #24 of 108 93 #7 of 82 89 #13 of 108
Overall 74 61 48
  • ALL ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • ZBRA ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • AFL ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALLZBRAAFLSPY
1 month +12.2%+4.2%+4.6% -1.0%
3 months -2.7%+48.7%-4.1% +2.9%
6 months +18.9%+69.7%+5.1% +6.4%
Year to date +21.6%+59.2%+9.3% +11.4%
1 year +30.2%+23.1%+12.0% +13.1%
3 years +103.7%+87.7%+55.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year +26.8%+23.4%+15.7% +21.5%
5 years +97.8%-26.8%+113.1% +67.7%
5 years, per year +14.6%-6.1%+16.4% +10.9%
10 years +274.8%+497.3%+247.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +14.1%+19.6%+13.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureALLZBRAAFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%47.2%17.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.4%42.0%17.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.461.67-0.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.180.490.68 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.7%-67.8%-20.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.0%-1.2%-7.0% -2.5%
52-week high $275.13$391.00$129.53 $779.14
52-week low $190.00$199.30$105.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALLZBRAAFL
P/E now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 10.5x 34.2xmedian 31.3x 12.5xmedian 10.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.4x 3.1xmedian 2.6x 3.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -3.2xmedian 8.0x 19.5xmedian 19.6x —median 8.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 8.4x 20.2xmedian 28.3x 22.9xmedian 8.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.5x 5.3xmedian 2.9x 2.0xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.05median 0.47 -9.05median 1.15 1.92median 0.47

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALLZBRAAFL
Revenue $70.14B $5.85B $18.07B
Gross profit $34.70B $2.90B $11.05B
Operating income -$19.17B $858.00M -$1.24B
Net income $13.31B $539.00M $4.86B
Free cash flow $12.25B $904.00M $2.65B
R&D – $622.00M –
EPS (diluted) $50.90 $11.20 $9.62
Cash & equivalents – $157.00M $6.12B
Total debt $7.49B $2.77B $8.73B
Shares (diluted) 259.10M 48.13M 505.58M
Enterprise value $26.75B $16.87B $36.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALLZBRAAFL
P/E 4.9x 34.2x 12.5x
P/FCF 5.2x 20.2x 22.9x
P/Operating cash flow 5.2x 18.7x 22.9x
P/S 0.9x 3.1x 3.3x
P/B 1.9x 5.3x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 6.7x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA -3.2x 19.5x –
EV/EBIT -3.2x 24.4x -51.1x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 3.6x 3.5x
EV/FCF 5.0x 23.1x 23.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.9x 21.3x 23.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.05 -9.05 1.92

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALLZBRAAFL
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.9% 12.7% 10.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 2.1% -1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 34.9% 14.9% 25.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.2% 2.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 43.8% 8.1% 68.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -0.9% 28.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 128.5% -1.6% 99.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 91.2% -6.1% 0.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 139.0% 4.8% 112.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 90.5% -3.8% 6.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 42.6% 5.8% 2.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.6% 63.5% -8.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 43.4% 6.0% 2.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.1% 83.6% -8.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALLZBRAAFL
Gross margin 49.5% 49.6% 61.1%
EBITDA margin -26.7% 18.3% –
Operating margin -27.3% 14.7% -6.8%
Pretax margin 24.2% 12.1% 32.0%
Net margin 18.8% 9.2% 26.9%
FCF margin 17.5% 15.5% 14.6%
Operating cash flow margin 17.8% 16.7% 14.6%
Return on equity 40.7% 15.6% 16.1%
Return on assets 10.7% 6.4% 4.2%
Return on invested capital -37.4% 10.6% -2.7%
Return on capital employed – 19.1% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.8x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALLZBRAAFL
Debt / assets 6.0% 32.0% 7.5%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.8x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 2.4x –
Debt / FCF 0.6x 3.1x 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 73.0% 60.2% 73.9%
Equity / assets 27.0% 39.8% 26.1%
Interest coverage -48.8x – -5.1x
Current ratio – 0.5x –
Quick ratio – 0.3x –
Cash ratio – 0.0x –
Altman Z-score – 3.76 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALLZBRAAFL
Dividend yield 1.7% – 2.0%
Net buyback yield 3.7% 4.9% 6.2%
Shareholder yield 5.4% 4.9% 8.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 8.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.3% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALLZBRAAFL
Forward P/E 6.7xFY2026 17.1xFY2026 16.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $37.74FY2026 $22.59FY2026 $7.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +8.4%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026 -2.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -29.6% -4.5% +8.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $64.66BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026 $17.69BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +8.6%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.1% +1.2% -0.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALLZBRAAFL
Held by institutions 82.8% 100.0% 68.2%
Institutions holding 1,750 644 1,698
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.0% +4.5% +0.6%
Institutions buying 870 309 740
Institutions selling 532 242 580
Buyers to sellers 1.64 1.28 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALLZBRAAFL
ALL 1.00 -0.01 0.59
ZBRA -0.01 1.00 0.03
AFL 0.59 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALL, ZBRA and AFL?

Allstate (ALL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Allstate (ALL) $65.48B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $18.31B, Aflac (AFL) $60.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALL, ZBRA and AFL?

Allstate (ALL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Allstate (ALL) 5.0x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 34.0x, Aflac (AFL) 12.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Allstate (ALL) is cheapest (Allstate (ALL) 6.7x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 17.1x, Aflac (AFL) 16.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Allstate (ALL) +5.9%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%, Aflac (AFL) +10.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Aflac (AFL) has the highest net margin (Allstate (ALL) 18.8%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%, Aflac (AFL) 26.9%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (Allstate (ALL) -37.4%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%, Aflac (AFL) -2.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Allstate (ALL) returned the most: Allstate (ALL) +30.2%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +23.1%, Aflac (AFL) +12.0%. Over five years, Aflac (AFL) compounded fastest (Allstate (ALL) +14.6%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -6.1%/yr, Aflac (AFL) +16.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Allstate (ALL) 0.02%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 0.00%, Aflac (AFL) 0.00%. Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) and Aflac (AFL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Aflac (AFL) has been the steadiest (Allstate (ALL) 25.6%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 47.2%, Aflac (AFL) 17.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALL, ZBRA and AFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Allstate (ALL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.