ALAR vs NTAP vs SRAD Stock Comparison

Alarum Technologies, NetApp and Sportradar Group AG Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALAR Alarum Technologies Ltd.
$1.41 -20.8% 1M -90.1% 1Y
Market cap
$9.43M
P/E
0.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.33M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
5 wins
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$222.08 +10.4% 1M +90.4% 1Y
Market cap
$44.64B
P/E
31.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
6 wins
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.60 -4.8% 1M -53.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.65B
P/E
634.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 6, Alarum Technologies 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALARNTAPSRADLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.43M $44.64B $12.65B NTAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.1x 31.5x 634.4x ALAR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.1x 21.2x 48.5x ALAR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +48.2% +12.2% +24.7% ALAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 145.1% 19.2% 1.2% ALAR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.4% 36.7% -8.6% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.5x 1.4x NTAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -90.1% +90.4% -53.4% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -34.1%/yr +20.3%/yr -9.0%/yr NTAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 113.8% 44.8% 56.6% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 56/100 59/100 ALAR

Percentile Scorecard

ALARNTAPSRAD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALARNTAPSRAD
Valuation 100 #1 of 124 41 #66 of 111 77 #29 of 124
Growth 65 #40 of 113 51 #53 of 108 63 #43 of 113
Profitability 79 #24 of 110 91 #10 of 104 71 #33 of 110
Financial Health 73 #35 of 129 27 #84 of 115 56 #57 of 129
Shareholder Returns – 70 #25 of 81 30 #47 of 67
Overall 79 56 59
  • ALAR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALARNTAPSRADSPY
1 month -20.8%+10.4%-4.8% -0.8%
3 months -24.6%+30.8%-14.2% +3.5%
6 months -78.8%+104.8%-9.5% +7.0%
Year to date -83.6%+107.4%-47.0% +12.2%
1 year -90.1%+90.4%-53.4% +13.0%
3 years -54.5%+209.3%+44.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -23.1%+45.7%+12.9% +23.1%
5 years -87.5%+151.3%-37.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -34.1%+20.3%-9.0% +11.0%
10 years —+553.2%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+20.6%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureALARNTAPSRADSPY
Volatility, 1Y 113.8%44.8%56.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 131.2%38.8%64.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.651.370.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.792.02-0.94 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.4%-43.5%-69.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -91.3%-7.1%-53.5% -1.8%
52-week high $16.25$239.18$27.11 $779.14
52-week low $1.18$94.11$11.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALARNTAPSRAD
P/E now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 38.1x 30.7xmedian 32.0x 655.2xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 4.3x 5.9xmedian 2.8x 2.4xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.4x 20.9xmedian 19.4x -14.4xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 27.1x 26.4xmedian 29.0x 7.7xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 3.4x 29.1xmedian 2.9x 4.4xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.27 3.74median 1.13 22.63median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALARNTAPSRAD
Revenue $45.33M $7.39B $1.62B
Gross profit $26.25M $5.22B –
Operating income $683.00K $1.85B –
Net income $1.15M $1.42B $19.94M
Free cash flow – $1.65B $510.26M
R&D $8.46M $1.02B $44.37M
EPS (diluted) $50.66 $7.09 $64,328.88
Cash & equivalents $14.06M $1.57B $286.82M
Total debt $3.23M $2.49B $49.28M
Shares (diluted) 1.30M 200.00M 310.00
Enterprise value -$46.17M $27.45B $10.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALARNTAPSRAD
P/E 0.1x 30.7x 655.2x
P/FCF – 26.4x 7.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 22.9x 7.8x
P/S 0.2x 5.9x 2.4x
P/B 0.3x 29.1x 4.4x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 29.9x 4.4x
EV/EBITDA – 20.9x -14.4x
EV/EBIT -5.2x 23.0x -42.7x
EV/Revenue -0.1x 5.7x 2.2x
EV/FCF – 25.7x 7.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 22.4x 7.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 3.74 22.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALARNTAPSRAD
Revenue growth (1Y) 48.2% 12.2% 24.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 6.0% 23.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.5% 13.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 30.5% 7.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -84.7% 35.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 25.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) -75.8% 21.1% -83.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -44.3% 5.5% 51.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 22.6% 22.9% -94.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 109.7% 8.2% 28.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 3.2% 15.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.0% 30.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -0.5% 15.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 15.5% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALARNTAPSRAD
Gross margin 57.9% 70.6% –
EBITDA margin – 27.5% -15.4%
Operating margin 1.5% 25.0% –
Pretax margin 3.8% 24.7% 1.4%
Net margin 145.1% 19.2% 1.2%
FCF margin – 22.3% 31.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 25.7% 31.0%
Return on equity 3.5% 99.6% 2.1%
Return on assets 2.5% 13.1% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 1.4% 36.7% -8.6%
Return on capital employed 1.9% 29.4% -3.5%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x 25.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 5.4% 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALARNTAPSRAD
Debt / assets 1.8% 22.7% 0.4%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.7x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.5x 1.4x
Debt / FCF – 1.5x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 25.6% 86.4% 69.5%
Equity / assets 74.4% 13.6% 30.5%
Interest coverage – – -0.8x
Current ratio 2.6x 1.2x 1.0x
Quick ratio 2.6x 1.0x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.5x 0.8x 0.6x
Altman Z-score -0.99 4.14 1.78

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALARNTAPSRAD
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield – 1.7% -1.0%
Shareholder yield – 2.6% -1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALARNTAPSRAD
Forward P/E 20.1xFY2026 21.2xFY2026 48.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 $10.50FY2026 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +600.0%FY2026 +29.2%FY2026 -27.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +100.0% +8.7% +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.86MFY2026 $8.49BFY2026 $1.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.4%FY2026 +22.7%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.0% +8.6% +10.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALARNTAPSRAD
Held by institutions 4.2% 97.4% 17.8%
Institutions holding 25 959 151
Change in shares held, QoQ +182.7% -1.0% -2.8%
Institutions buying 16 501 88
Institutions selling 4 336 42
Buyers to sellers 4.00 1.49 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALARNTAPSRAD
ALAR 1.00 0.02 -0.07
NTAP 0.02 1.00 0.09
SRAD -0.07 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALAR, NTAP and SRAD?

NetApp (NTAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) $9.43M, NetApp (NTAP) $44.64B, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $12.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALAR, NTAP and SRAD?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 0.1x, NetApp (NTAP) 31.5x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 634.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) is cheapest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 20.1x, NetApp (NTAP) 21.2x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 48.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) +48.2%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) has the highest net margin (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 145.1%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 1.4%, NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -90.1%, NetApp (NTAP) +90.4%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -53.4%. Over five years, NetApp (NTAP) compounded fastest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -34.1%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +20.3%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -9.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 113.8%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.8%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALAR, NTAP and SRAD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.