ALAR vs ITMSF vs GRSD Stock Comparison

Alarum Technologies, Intermap Technologies and Grandstand Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALAR Alarum Technologies Ltd.
$1.41 -20.8% 1M -90.1% 1Y
Market cap
$9.75M
P/E
0.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.33M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
4 wins
GRSD GRANDSTAND Ltd
$1.17 -25.5% 1M -84.5% 1Y
Market cap
$41.06M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$163.42M
Div. yield
–
Marketing Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Grandstand leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Grandstand 4, Alarum Technologies 4, Intermap Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALARITMSFGRSDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.75M $39.84M $41.06M GRSD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.1x -3.5x -1.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.1x 27.5x 9.7x GRSD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +48.2% -66.2% +10.7% ALAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 145.1% -147.8% -23.1% ALAR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.4% — -10.9% ALAR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x -10.9x GRSD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -90.1% -74.8% -84.5% ITMSF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -34.1%/yr -4.7%/yr -38.9%/yr ITMSF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 113.8% 84.7% 80.7% GRSD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 27/100 50/100 ALAR

Percentile Scorecard

ALARITMSFGRSD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALARITMSFGRSD
Valuation 95 #4 of 65 22 #51 of 65 90 #5 of 41
Growth 64 #21 of 56 2 #55 of 56 11 #34 of 38
Profitability 84 #9 of 52 26 #39 of 52 54 #17 of 36
Financial Health 72 #20 of 69 60 #28 of 69 45 #27 of 48
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 79 27 50
  • ALAR ranked among 75 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ITMSF ranked among 75 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GRSD ranked among 51 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALARITMSFGRSDSPY
1 month -20.8%-14.1%-25.5% -0.8%
3 months -24.6%-22.5%-40.0% +3.5%
6 months -78.8%-62.8%-69.3% +7.0%
Year to date -83.6%-59.6%-78.6% +12.2%
1 year -90.1%-74.8%-84.5% +13.0%
3 years -54.5%+37.5%-90.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year -23.1%+11.2%-54.8% +23.1%
5 years -87.5%-21.4%-91.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -34.1%-4.7%-38.9% +11.0%
10 years —-21.4%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —-2.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureALARITMSFGRSDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 113.8%84.7%80.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 131.2%99.0%96.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.650.861.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.79-0.88-1.05 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.4%-78.5%-93.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -91.3%-73.7%-84.8% -1.8%
52-week high $16.25$2.09$7.68 $779.14
52-week low $1.18$0.54$1.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALARITMSFGRSD
P/E now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 50.3x -3.5xmedian 50.3x -1.1xmedian 20.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.5x 6.0xmedian 2.5x 0.3xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.4x -2.8xmedian 35.4x -14.8xmedian 21.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.0x -4.6xmedian 18.0x 10.9xmedian 25.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.5x 2.3xmedian 1.5x 0.4xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.58 —median 1.58 0.01median 2.04

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALARITMSFGRSD
Revenue $45.33M $6.65M $163.42M
Gross profit $26.25M – $141.10M
Operating income $683.00K -$9.75M -$24.88M
Net income $1.15M -$9.82M -$34.80M
Free cash flow – -$8.57M $3.77M
R&D $8.46M – –
EPS (diluted) $50.66 $-0.16 $-1.06
Cash & equivalents $14.06M $16.18M $8.81M
Total debt $3.23M $1.65M $122.33M
Shares (diluted) 1.30M 61.80M 35.48M
Enterprise value -$45.86M -$43.93M $673.71K

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALARITMSFGRSD
P/E 0.1x -3.5x -1.1x
P/FCF – -4.6x 10.9x
P/Operating cash flow – -5.6x 11.2x
P/S 0.2x 6.0x 0.3x
P/B 0.3x 2.3x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 2.4x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA – -2.8x -14.8x
EV/EBIT -5.2x -2.5x -6.2x
EV/Revenue -0.1x 3.6x 0.9x
EV/FCF – -2.8x 41.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -3.4x 42.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 – 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALARITMSFGRSD
Revenue growth (1Y) 48.2% -66.2% 10.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 30.6% – 20.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.5% – 1.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 30.5% – 15.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -84.7% -1,317% -264.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% – -69.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -75.8% -1,584% -304.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -44.3% – -91.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 22.6% -1,313% -265.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 109.7% – -105.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -365.1% -89.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -46.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -216.7% -89.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -49.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALARITMSFGRSD
Gross margin 57.9% – 86.3%
EBITDA margin – -128.3% -6.4%
Operating margin 1.5% -146.6% -15.2%
Pretax margin 3.8% -152.3% -21.6%
Net margin 145.1% -147.8% -23.1%
FCF margin – -129.0% 2.3%
Operating cash flow margin – -107.7% 2.2%
Return on equity 3.5% -51.9% -32.9%
Return on assets 2.5% -36.5% -12.1%
Return on invested capital 1.4% – -10.9%
Return on capital employed 1.9% -45.5% -10.8%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.2x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.7x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 9.6% 4.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALARITMSFGRSD
Debt / assets 1.8% 1.6% 43.0%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.0x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x -10.9x
Debt / FCF – 0.0x 32.5x
Liabilities / assets 25.6% 32.0% 63.2%
Equity / assets 74.4% 68.0% 36.8%
Interest coverage – -180.5x -5.5x
Current ratio 2.6x 3.3x 0.6x
Quick ratio 2.6x 3.2x 0.6x
Cash ratio 1.5x 2.9x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -0.99 -11.00 0.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALARITMSFGRSD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALARITMSFGRSD
Forward P/E 20.1xFY2026 27.5xFY2026 9.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 $0.02FY2026 $0.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +600.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +100.0% +350.0% +308.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.86MFY2026 $32.39MFY2026 $173.87MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.4%FY2026 +205.6%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.0% +29.0% +5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALARITMSFGRSD
Held by institutions 4.2% – –
Institutions holding 25 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +182.7% – –
Institutions buying 16 – –
Institutions selling 4 – –
Buyers to sellers 4.00 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALARITMSFGRSD
ALAR 1.00 0.07 0.03
ITMSF 0.07 1.00 0.13
GRSD 0.03 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALAR, ITMSF and GRSD?

Grandstand (GRSD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) $9.75M, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $39.84M, Grandstand (GRSD) $41.06M.

Which company is growing faster?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) +48.2%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%, Grandstand (GRSD) +10.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) has the highest net margin (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 145.1%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%, Grandstand (GRSD) -23.1%). On return on invested capital, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) leads (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 1.4%, Grandstand (GRSD) -10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) returned the most: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -90.1%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -74.8%, Grandstand (GRSD) -84.5%. Over five years, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) compounded fastest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -34.1%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.7%/yr, Grandstand (GRSD) -38.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grandstand (GRSD) has been the steadiest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 113.8%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.7%, Grandstand (GRSD) 80.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALAR, ITMSF and GRSD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grandstand (GRSD) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.