ALAR vs GENI vs SRAD Stock Comparison

Alarum Technologies, Genius Sports and Sportradar Group AG Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALAR Alarum Technologies Ltd.
$1.41 -20.8% 1M -90.1% 1Y
Market cap
$9.27M
P/E
0.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.33M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
6 wins
GENI Genius Sports Ltd
$6.51 +1.4% 1M -45.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.63B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$790.23M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.60 -4.8% 1M -53.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.82B
P/E
642.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Alarum Technologies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Alarum Technologies 6, Sportradar Group AG 3, Genius Sports 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALARGENISRADLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.27M $1.63B $12.82B SRAD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.1x -9.0x 642.7x ALAR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.1x — 48.5x ALAR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +48.2% +41.5% +24.7% ALAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 145.1% -23.0% 1.2% ALAR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.4% — -8.6% ALAR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -12.0x 1.4x GENI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -90.1% -45.9% -53.4% GENI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -34.1%/yr -18.4%/yr -9.0%/yr SRAD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 113.8% 75.0% 56.6% SRAD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 35/100 59/100 ALAR

Percentile Scorecard

ALARGENISRAD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALARGENISRAD
Valuation 100 #1 of 124 46 #67 of 124 77 #29 of 124
Growth 65 #40 of 113 31 #78 of 113 63 #43 of 113
Profitability 79 #24 of 110 46 #60 of 110 71 #33 of 110
Financial Health 73 #35 of 129 16 #109 of 129 56 #57 of 129
Shareholder Returns – – 30 #47 of 67
Overall 79 35 59
  • ALAR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GENI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALARGENISRADSPY
1 month -20.8%+1.4%-4.8% -0.8%
3 months -24.6%-10.6%-14.2% +3.5%
6 months -78.8%+47.3%-9.5% +7.0%
Year to date -83.6%-40.9%-47.0% +12.2%
1 year -90.1%-45.9%-53.4% +13.0%
3 years -54.5%+38.8%+44.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -23.1%+11.6%+12.9% +23.1%
5 years -87.5%-63.7%-37.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -34.1%-18.4%-9.0% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureALARGENISRADSPY
Volatility, 1Y 113.8%75.0%56.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 131.2%75.7%64.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.651.700.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.79-0.61-0.94 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.4%-88.4%-69.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -91.3%-45.8%-53.5% -1.8%
52-week high $16.25$12.02$27.11 $779.14
52-week low $1.18$3.92$11.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALARGENISRAD
P/E now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 38.1x -9.1xmedian 38.1x 655.2xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 4.3x 4.2xmedian 4.3x 2.4xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.4x -74.7xmedian 35.4x -14.4xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 27.1x -66.2xmedian 27.1x 7.7xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 3.4x 4.8xmedian 3.4x 4.4xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.27 -1.46median 1.27 22.63median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALARGENISRAD
Revenue $45.33M $790.23M $1.62B
Gross profit $26.25M $216.86M –
Operating income $683.00K -$148.94M –
Net income $1.15M -$181.64M $19.94M
Free cash flow – -$49.83M $510.26M
R&D $8.46M $38.20M $44.37M
EPS (diluted) $50.66 $-0.71 $64,328.88
Cash & equivalents $14.06M $155.08M $286.82M
Total debt $3.23M $785.33M $49.28M
Shares (diluted) 1.30M 254.76M 310.00
Enterprise value -$46.34M $787.03M $11.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALARGENISRAD
P/E 0.1x -9.1x 655.2x
P/FCF – -66.2x 7.7x
P/Operating cash flow – -106.1x 7.8x
P/S 0.2x 4.2x 2.4x
P/B 0.3x 4.8x 4.4x
P/Tangible book 0.3x -46.8x 4.4x
EV/EBITDA – -74.7x -14.4x
EV/EBIT -5.2x -26.4x -42.7x
EV/Revenue -0.1x 5.0x 2.2x
EV/FCF – -78.9x 7.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -126.4x 7.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 -1.46 22.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALARGENISRAD
Revenue growth (1Y) 48.2% 41.5% 24.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 29.0% 23.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.5% 64.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 30.5% 71.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -84.7% -30.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% -11.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -75.8% -133.3% -83.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -44.3% -1.8% 51.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 22.6% -93.2% -94.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 109.7% 6.3% 28.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -158.3% 15.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -9.0% 30.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -211.2% 15.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -20.2% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALARGENISRAD
Gross margin 57.9% 27.4% –
EBITDA margin – -6.7% -15.4%
Operating margin 1.5% -18.8% –
Pretax margin 3.8% -21.3% 1.4%
Net margin 145.1% -23.0% 1.2%
FCF margin – -6.3% 31.6%
Operating cash flow margin – -3.9% 31.0%
Return on equity 3.5% -0.1% 2.1%
Return on assets 2.5% -11.0% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 1.4% – -8.6%
Return on capital employed 1.9% -13.6% -3.5%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.2x 25.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 11.8% 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALARGENISRAD
Debt / assets 1.8% 37.1% 0.4%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -12.0x 1.4x
Debt / FCF – -15.8x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 25.6% 67.7% 69.5%
Equity / assets 74.4% 32.3% 30.5%
Interest coverage – – -0.8x
Current ratio 2.6x 1.0x 1.0x
Quick ratio 2.6x 0.8x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.5x 0.3x 0.6x
Altman Z-score -0.99 0.64 1.78

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALARGENISRAD
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -1.0%
Shareholder yield – – -1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALARGENISRAD
Forward P/E 20.1xFY2026 – 48.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 $-0.31FY2026 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +600.0%FY2026 – -27.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +100.0% – +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.86MFY2026 $1.05BFY2026 $1.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.4%FY2026 +57.2%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.0% +16.9% +10.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALARGENISRAD
Held by institutions 4.2% 93.6% 17.8%
Institutions holding 25 273 151
Change in shares held, QoQ +182.7% +7.7% -2.8%
Institutions buying 16 179 88
Institutions selling 4 70 42
Buyers to sellers 4.00 2.56 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALARGENISRAD
ALAR 1.00 0.09 -0.07
GENI 0.09 1.00 0.40
SRAD -0.07 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALAR, GENI and SRAD?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) $9.27M, Genius Sports (GENI) $1.63B, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $12.82B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALAR, GENI and SRAD?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 0.1x, Genius Sports (GENI) -9.0x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 642.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) is cheapest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 20.1x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 48.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) +48.2%, Genius Sports (GENI) +41.5%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) has the highest net margin (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 145.1%, Genius Sports (GENI) -23.0%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) leads (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 1.4%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Genius Sports (GENI) returned the most: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -90.1%, Genius Sports (GENI) -45.9%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -53.4%. Over five years, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) compounded fastest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -34.1%/yr, Genius Sports (GENI) -18.4%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -9.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has been the steadiest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 113.8%, Genius Sports (GENI) 75.0%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALAR, GENI and SRAD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alarum Technologies (ALAR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.