ALAR vs GENI vs ITMSF Stock Comparison

Alarum Technologies, Genius Sports and Intermap Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALAR Alarum Technologies Ltd.
$1.39 -21.9% 1M -90.9% 1Y
Market cap
$9.23M
P/E
0.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.33M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
4 wins
GENI Genius Sports Ltd
$6.32 -1.6% 1M -47.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.61B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$790.23M
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Genius Sports leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Genius Sports 4, Alarum Technologies 4, Intermap Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALARGENIITMSFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.23M $1.61B $34.00M GENI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.1x -8.9x -3.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.9x — 27.5x ALAR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +48.2% +41.5% -66.2% ALAR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 145.1% -23.0% -147.8% ALAR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -12.0x 1.8x GENI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -90.9% -47.4% -73.4% GENI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -34.0%/yr -19.7%/yr -4.2%/yr ITMSF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 113.6% 74.9% 84.5% GENI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 79/100 35/100 26/100 ALAR

Percentile Scorecard

ALARGENIITMSF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALARGENIITMSF
Valuation 99 #2 of 124 47 #66 of 124 19 #101 of 124
Growth 65 #40 of 113 31 #78 of 113 1 #112 of 113
Profitability 80 #23 of 109 46 #59 of 109 20 #87 of 109
Financial Health 73 #35 of 127 16 #107 of 127 64 #47 of 127
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 79 35 26
  • ALAR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GENI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ITMSF ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALARGENIITMSFSPY
1 month -21.9%-1.6%-14.1% -0.2%
3 months -22.3%-13.5%-25.7% +3.9%
6 months -79.1%+46.3%-61.5% +8.2%
Year to date -83.8%-42.6%-59.6% +12.9%
1 year -90.9%-47.4%-73.4% +12.3%
3 years -55.2%+34.8%+37.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -23.5%+10.5%+11.2% +23.3%
5 years -87.5%-66.6%-19.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -34.0%-19.7%-4.2% +10.9%
10 years ——-21.4% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——-2.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureALARGENIITMSFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 113.6%74.9%84.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 130.7%75.5%99.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.641.680.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.80-0.63-0.87 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.4%-88.4%-78.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -91.4%-47.4%-73.7% -1.2%
52-week high $16.25$12.02$2.09 $779.14
52-week low $1.18$3.92$0.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALARGENIITMSF
P/E now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 38.6x -8.9xmedian 38.6x -3.5xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 4.4x 4.1xmedian 4.4x 6.0xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x -72.9xmedian 34.5x -2.8xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 29.4x -64.3xmedian 29.4x -4.6xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 3.3x 4.7xmedian 3.3x 2.3xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.28 -1.42median 1.28 —median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALARGENIITMSF
Revenue $45.33M $790.23M $6.65M
Gross profit $26.25M $216.86M –
Operating income $683.00K -$148.94M -$9.75M
Net income $1.15M -$181.64M -$9.82M
Free cash flow – -$49.83M -$8.57M
R&D $8.46M $38.20M –
EPS (diluted) $50.66 $-0.71 $-0.16
Cash & equivalents $14.06M $155.08M $16.18M
Total debt $3.23M $785.33M $1.65M
Shares (diluted) 1.30M 254.76M 61.80M
Enterprise value -$46.37M $773.02M -$49.78M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALARGENIITMSF
P/E 0.1x -8.9x -3.5x
P/FCF – -64.3x -4.6x
P/Operating cash flow – -103.0x -5.6x
P/S 0.2x 4.1x 6.0x
P/B 0.3x 4.7x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 0.3x -45.4x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – -72.9x -2.8x
EV/EBIT -5.4x -25.7x -2.5x
EV/Revenue -0.1x 4.9x 3.6x
EV/FCF – -76.9x -2.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – -123.3x -3.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 -1.42 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALARGENIITMSF
Revenue growth (1Y) 48.2% 41.5% -66.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 29.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.5% 64.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 30.5% 71.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -84.7% -30.2% -1,317%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% -11.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -75.8% -133.3% -1,584%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -44.3% -1.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 22.6% -93.2% -1,313%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 109.7% 6.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -158.3% -365.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -9.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -211.2% -216.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -20.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALARGENIITMSF
Gross margin 57.9% 27.4% –
EBITDA margin – -6.7% -128.3%
Operating margin 1.5% -18.8% -146.6%
Pretax margin 3.8% -21.3% -152.3%
Net margin 145.1% -23.0% -147.8%
FCF margin – -6.3% -129.0%
Operating cash flow margin – -3.9% -107.7%
Return on equity 3.5% -0.1% -51.9%
Return on assets 2.5% -11.0% -36.5%
Return on invested capital 1.4% – –
Return on capital employed 1.9% -13.6% -45.5%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.2x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 11.8% 9.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALARGENIITMSF
Debt / assets 1.8% 37.1% 1.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -12.0x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – -15.8x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 25.6% 67.7% 32.0%
Equity / assets 74.4% 32.3% 68.0%
Interest coverage – – -180.5x
Current ratio 2.6x 1.0x 3.3x
Quick ratio 2.6x 0.8x 3.2x
Cash ratio 1.5x 0.3x 2.9x
Altman Z-score -1.00 0.60 -11.00

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALARGENIITMSF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALARGENIITMSF
Forward P/E 19.9xFY2026 – 27.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 $-0.31FY2026 $0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +600.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +100.0% – +350.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $47.86MFY2026 $1.05BFY2026 $32.39MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.4%FY2026 +57.2%FY2026 +205.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.0% +16.9% +29.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALARGENIITMSF
Held by institutions 4.2% 93.6% –
Institutions holding 25 273 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +182.7% +7.7% –
Institutions buying 16 179 –
Institutions selling 4 70 –
Buyers to sellers 4.00 2.56 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALARGENIITMSF
ALAR 1.00 0.09 0.07
GENI 0.09 1.00 0.09
ITMSF 0.07 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALAR, GENI and ITMSF?

Genius Sports (GENI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) $9.23M, Genius Sports (GENI) $1.61B, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) $34.00M.

Which company is growing faster?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) +48.2%, Genius Sports (GENI) +41.5%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -66.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Alarum Technologies (ALAR) has the highest net margin (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 145.1%, Genius Sports (GENI) -23.0%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -147.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Genius Sports (GENI) returned the most: Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -90.9%, Genius Sports (GENI) -47.4%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -73.4%. Over five years, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) compounded fastest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) -34.0%/yr, Genius Sports (GENI) -19.7%/yr, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) -4.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Genius Sports (GENI) has been the steadiest (Alarum Technologies (ALAR) 113.6%, Genius Sports (GENI) 74.9%, Intermap Technologies (ITMSF) 84.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALAR, GENI and ITMSF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Genius Sports (GENI) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.