ALAB vs MRVL vs AMD Stock Comparison

Astera Labs, Marvell Technology and Advanced Micro Devices Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.
$257.16 -28.7% 1M +57.1% 1Y
Market cap
$44.74B
P/E
121.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.20B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
3 wins
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$228.51 -12.4% 1M +176.1% 1Y
Market cap
$209.82B
P/E
79.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
3 wins
AMD Advanced Micro Devices Inc
$516.79 -15.9% 1M +119.9% 1Y
Market cap
$867.62B
P/E
134.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$41.31B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Advanced Micro Devices leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Advanced Micro Devices 5, Marvell Technology 3, Astera Labs 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALABMRVLAMDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $44.74B $209.82B $867.62B AMD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 121.1x 79.5x 134.8x MRVL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 68.9x 55.5x 70.0x MRVL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +98.5% +30.6% +39.5% ALAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.7% 27.9% 15.6% ALAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.8% 8.0% AMD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x -1.0x AMD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +57.1% +176.1% +119.9% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +28.1%/yr +34.0%/yr AMD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 98.4% 79.1% 68.6% AMD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 50/100 59/100 ALAB

Percentile Scorecard

ALABMRVLAMD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALABMRVLAMD
Valuation 9 #87 of 95 26 #71 of 95 28 #69 of 95
Growth 91 #9 of 93 90 #10 of 93 96 #5 of 93
Profitability 79 #20 of 91 60 #37 of 91 67 #31 of 91
Financial Health 92 #9 of 102 50 #52 of 102 67 #34 of 102
Shareholder Returns 35 #50 of 76 25 #57 of 76 39 #47 of 76
Overall 61 50 59
  • ALAB ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • MRVL ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • AMD ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALABMRVLAMDSPY
1 month -28.7%-12.4%-15.9% -1.0%
3 months -11.8%+17.6%-1.0% +2.9%
6 months +20.8%+39.1%+48.6% +6.4%
Year to date +54.6%+168.9%+141.3% +11.4%
1 year +57.1%+176.1%+119.9% +13.1%
3 years —+361.7%+408.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year —+66.6%+72.0% +21.5%
5 years —+244.6%+331.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year —+28.1%+34.0% +10.9%
10 years —+1,671.4%+7,826.2% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+33.3%+54.9% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureALABMRVLAMDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 98.4%79.1%68.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 100.9%74.9%65.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.883.233.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.582.231.75 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.7%-62.1%-65.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.8%-27.8%-20.4% -2.5%
52-week high $483.02$316.43$649.42 $779.14
52-week low $100.27$73.73$190.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALABMRVLAMD
P/E now vs peer median 120.0xmedian 41.5x 77.7xmedian 41.5x 131.1xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 37.1xmedian 6.9x 21.2xmedian 6.9x 20.4xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 151.9xmedian 27.3x 71.4xmedian 27.3x 87.6xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 161.2xmedian 35.6x 115.8xmedian 35.6x 100.8xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 25.9xmedian 4.2x 10.8xmedian 4.2x 12.5xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 2.31 0.75median 2.31 0.25median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALABMRVLAMD
Revenue $1.20B $9.45B $41.31B
Gross profit $903.00M $4.93B $21.98B
Operating income $273.45M $1.56B $6.49B
Net income $369.49M $2.64B $6.43B
Free cash flow $276.68M $1.73B $8.37B
R&D $434.25M $2.44B $9.39B
EPS (diluted) $2.02 $2.87 $3.88
Cash & equivalents $111.45M $3.93B $5.09B
Total debt – $4.96B $12.89B
Shares (diluted) 183.34M 921.20M 1.66B
Enterprise value $39.98B $196.69B $824.37B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALABMRVLAMD
P/E 120.0x 77.7x 131.1x
P/FCF 161.2x 115.8x 100.8x
P/Operating cash flow 132.9x 91.1x 83.7x
P/S 37.1x 21.2x 20.4x
P/B 25.9x 10.8x 12.5x
P/Tangible book 25.9x 12.4x 16.3x
EV/EBITDA 151.9x 71.4x 87.6x
EV/EBIT 158.6x 129.0x 128.5x
EV/Revenue 36.1x 21.3x 20.2x
EV/FCF 156.7x 116.4x 99.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 129.2x 91.5x 82.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.75 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALABMRVLAMD
Revenue growth (1Y) 98.5% 30.6% 39.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 18.9% 23.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 97.5% 52.8% 55.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 25.0% 32.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 546.3% 1,577% 186.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 100.2% 167.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 268.9% 2,653% 127.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 107.8% 537.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 258.4% 2,512% 123.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 104.2% 533.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.8% 19.3% 106.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 26.6% 61.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 31.5% 12.8% 106.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 30.6% 64.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALABMRVLAMD
Gross margin 75.1% 52.2% 53.2%
EBITDA margin 23.7% 29.9% 23.0%
Operating margin 22.8% 16.5% 15.7%
Pretax margin 26.8% 32.4% 18.3%
Net margin 30.7% 27.9% 15.6%
FCF margin 23.0% 18.3% 20.3%
Operating cash flow margin 27.9% 23.3% 24.4%
Return on equity 23.0% 14.4% 9.8%
Return on assets 20.6% 9.7% 7.8%
Return on invested capital – 5.8% 8.0%
Return on capital employed 16.8% 6.3% 9.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.3x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.8x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 16.2% 8.8% 4.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALABMRVLAMD
Debt / assets – 18.0% 3.8%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x -1.0x
Debt / FCF – 2.9x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 10.7% 32.7% 20.4%
Equity / assets 89.3% 67.3% 79.6%
Interest coverage – 7.2x 44.1x
Current ratio 10.1x 3.2x 2.6x
Quick ratio 8.8x 2.5x 1.7x
Cash ratio 7.6x 1.6x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 132.26 14.17 30.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALABMRVLAMD
Dividend yield – 0.1% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% -0.1% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALABMRVLAMD
Forward P/E 68.9xFY2026 55.5xFY2026 70.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.73FY2026 $4.12FY2026 $7.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +102.7%FY2026 +45.1%FY2026 +77.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +64.9% +83.5% +111.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.01BFY2026 $11.42BFY2026 $53.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +135.3%FY2026 +39.5%FY2026 +53.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +46.5% +80.2% +60.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALABMRVLAMD
Held by institutions 73.6% 78.7% 72.5%
Institutions holding 986 2,214 3,991
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% +0.1% +10.7%
Institutions buying 660 1,430 2,270
Institutions selling 253 646 1,456
Buyers to sellers 2.61 2.21 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALABMRVLAMD
ALAB 1.00 0.61 0.63
MRVL 0.61 1.00 0.59
AMD 0.63 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALAB, MRVL and AMD?

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Astera Labs (ALAB) $44.74B, Marvell Technology (MRVL) $209.82B, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) $867.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALAB, MRVL and AMD?

Marvell Technology (MRVL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Astera Labs (ALAB) 121.1x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.5x, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) 134.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Marvell Technology (MRVL) is cheapest (Astera Labs (ALAB) 68.9x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 55.5x, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) 70.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Astera Labs (ALAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Astera Labs (ALAB) +98.5%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) +39.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Astera Labs (ALAB) has the highest net margin (Astera Labs (ALAB) 30.7%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) 15.6%). On return on invested capital, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) leads (Marvell Technology (MRVL) 5.8%, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) 8.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Astera Labs (ALAB) +57.1%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +176.1%, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) +119.9%. Over five years, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) compounded fastest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) +28.1%/yr, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) +34.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) has been the steadiest (Astera Labs (ALAB) 98.4%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.1%, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) 68.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALAB, MRVL and AMD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.