ALAB vs ARM vs MPWR Stock Comparison

Astera Labs, Arm Holdings and Monolithic Power Systems Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MRVL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.
$179.47 -54.0% 1M -1.4% 1Y
Market cap
$31.36B
P/E
67.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.56B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
3 wins
ARM Arm Holdings Plc /Uk
$166.72 -44.9% 1M +4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$177.40B
P/E
189.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.46B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Monolithic Power Systems leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Monolithic Power Systems 4, Astera Labs 3, Arm Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionALABARMMPWRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $31.36B $177.40B $55.20B ARM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 67.7x 189.0x 62.1x MPWR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 47.9x 80.5x 40.7x MPWR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +115.2% +23.8% +40.5% ALAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.6% 17.1% 23.9% ALAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.67% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.4% +4.1% +13.1% MPWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +15.7%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 102.1% 81.0% 55.8% MPWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 60/100 59/100 ALAB

Percentile Scorecard

ALABARMMPWR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisALABARMMPWR
Valuation 15 #80 of 94 9 #86 of 94 22 #74 of 94
Growth 93 #7 of 92 80 #19 of 92 67 #31 of 92
Profitability 80 #19 of 90 70 #28 of 90 79 #20 of 90
Financial Health 88 #13 of 101 81 #20 of 101 68 #33 of 101
Shareholder Returns 45 #45 of 81 – 59 #34 of 81
Overall 64 60 59
  • ALAB ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ARM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MPWR ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodALABARMMPWRSPY
1 month -54.0%-44.9%-23.2% -5.9%
3 months -45.9%-41.8%-16.8% -4.6%
6 months -8.3%-21.8%-28.2% +0.2%
Year to date +7.9%+52.5%+24.8% +7.5%
1 year -1.4%+4.1%+13.1% +8.2%
3 years —+214.0%+129.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year —+46.5%+31.9% +19.0%
5 years ——+107.1% +56.5%
5 years, per year ——+15.7% +9.4%
10 years ——+1,375.3% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——+30.9% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureALABARMMPWRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 102.1%81.0%55.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 107.5%75.9%60.4% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 4.003.402.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.010.050.24 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.7%-62.1%-51.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.8%-62.1%-33.0% -5.9%
52-week high $483.02$439.46$1,689.89 $779.14
52-week low $100.27$104.55$856.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleALABARMMPWR
P/E now vs peer median 67.7xmedian 35.6x 189.0xmedian 35.6x 62.1xmedian 35.6x
P/S now vs peer median 20.2xmedian 5.8x 32.5xmedian 5.8x 14.8xmedian 5.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 72.7xmedian 21.9x 143.3xmedian 21.9x 46.3xmedian 21.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 91.0xmedian 30.7x 103.5xmedian 30.7x 91.0xmedian 30.7x
P/B now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 3.5x 19.5xmedian 3.5x 14.8xmedian 3.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.25 2.66median 1.25 2.45median 1.25

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsALABARMMPWR
Revenue $1.56B $5.46B $3.74B
Gross profit $1.15B $5.32B $2.07B
Operating income $397.10M $915.00M $1.10B
Net income $461.32M $936.00M $893.25M
Free cash flow $344.69M $1.71B $606.43M
R&D $526.28M $3.13B $455.36M
EPS (diluted) $2.51 $0.88 $18.16
Cash & equivalents $209.40M $3.25B $560.54M
Shares (diluted) 184.08M 1.07B 49.18M
Enterprise value $26.36B $162.75B $50.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricALABARMMPWR
P/E 67.7x 189.0x 62.1x
P/FCF 91.0x 103.5x 91.0x
P/Operating cash flow 71.8x 102.3x 63.2x
P/S 20.2x 32.5x 14.8x
P/B 15.7x 19.5x 14.8x
P/Tangible book 15.7x 20.4x 14.8x
EV/EBITDA 72.7x 143.3x 46.3x
EV/EBIT 75.5x 189.9x 49.1x
EV/Revenue 19.3x 31.8x 14.5x
EV/FCF 87.0x 101.4x 89.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 68.7x 100.2x 62.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.66 2.45

Growth

14 metrics
MetricALABARMMPWR
Revenue growth (1Y) 115.2% 23.8% 40.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 24.4% 27.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 110.9% 23.9% 40.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 25.3% 25.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 272.5% 6.1% 59.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 83.1% 29.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 132.0% 12.8% -47.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 73.2% 25.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 127.6% 12.2% -48.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 71.0% 25.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 65.6% 9.7% -3.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.9% 17.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 50.2% 10.4% -14.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.3% 8.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricALABARMMPWR
Gross margin 73.9% 97.4% 55.3%
EBITDA margin 26.5% 22.2% 31.2%
Operating margin 25.5% 16.7% 29.5%
Pretax margin 28.7% 21.4% 30.6%
Net margin 29.6% 17.1% 23.9%
FCF margin 22.1% 31.4% 16.2%
Operating cash flow margin 28.1% 31.7% 23.4%
Return on equity 24.8% 12.3% 23.4%
Return on assets 21.8% 9.7% 19.1%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 21.2% 8.9% 27.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.5x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.9x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 15.2% 23.2% 6.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricALABARMMPWR
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 13.1% 20.4% 20.1%
Equity / assets 86.9% 79.6% 79.9%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 8.0x 6.3x 3.7x
Quick ratio 6.8x 3.7x 2.4x
Cash ratio 5.7x 3.7x 1.7x
Altman Z-score 64.94 47.65 38.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricALABARMMPWR
Dividend yield – – 0.7%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – 0.8%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusALABARMMPWR
Forward P/E 47.9xFY2026 80.5xFY2026 40.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.75FY2026 $2.07FY2026 $27.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +103.8%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026 +56.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +64.5% +49.3% +70.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.01BFY2026 $5.71BFY2026 $4.43BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +135.3%FY2026 +16.0%FY2026 +59.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +47.4% +38.7% +57.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersALABARMMPWR
Held by institutions 73.6% 9.3% 96.9%
Institutions holding 988 958 1,248
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% +12.5% +3.2%
Institutions buying 662 595 641
Institutions selling 253 258 460
Buyers to sellers 2.62 2.31 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ALABARMMPWR
ALAB 1.00 0.56 0.55
ARM 0.56 1.00 0.56
MPWR 0.55 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ALAB, ARM and MPWR?

Arm Holdings (ARM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Astera Labs (ALAB) $31.36B, Arm Holdings (ARM) $177.40B, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) $55.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, ALAB, ARM and MPWR?

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Astera Labs (ALAB) 67.7x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 189.0x, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 62.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) is cheapest (Astera Labs (ALAB) 47.9x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 80.5x, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 40.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Astera Labs (ALAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Astera Labs (ALAB) +115.2%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +23.8%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +40.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Astera Labs (ALAB) has the highest net margin (Astera Labs (ALAB) 29.6%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 17.1%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 23.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) returned the most: Astera Labs (ALAB) -1.4%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +4.1%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +13.1%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Astera Labs (ALAB) 0.00%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 0.67%. Astera Labs (ALAB) and Arm Holdings (ARM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) has been the steadiest (Astera Labs (ALAB) 102.1%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 81.0%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 55.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ALAB, ARM and MPWR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.