AKAM vs UI vs XNET Stock Comparison

Akamai Technologies, Ubiquiti and Xunlei Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AKAM Akamai Technologies Inc
$98.50 -13.6% 1M +31.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.39B
P/E
35.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
–
Content Delivery Networks Technology
3 wins
UI Ubiquiti Inc.
$585.48 +4.3% 1M -20.4% 1Y
Market cap
$36.33B
P/E
37.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.27B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
3 wins
XNET Xunlei Ltd
$3.84 -23.4% 1M -58.7% 1Y
Market cap
$239.19M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$424.54M
Div. yield
–
Content Delivery Networks Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Ubiquiti leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Ubiquiti 3, Akamai Technologies 3, Xunlei 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAKAMUIXNETLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.39B $36.33B $239.19M UI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.0x 37.8x -3.3x AKAM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.6x 31.0x — AKAM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.9% +27.2% +40.4% XNET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.5% 29.3% -16.9% UI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 72.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +31.2% -20.4% -58.7% AKAM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.1%/yr +14.4%/yr +5.9%/yr UI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.5% 53.8% 52.8% XNET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 68/100 74/100 XNET

Percentile Scorecard

AKAMUIXNET

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAKAMUIXNET
Valuation 89 #5 of 38 27 #81 of 111 100 #1 of 38
Growth 14 #31 of 36 90 #12 of 108 46 #20 of 36
Profitability 79 #8 of 34 99 #2 of 104 64 #13 of 34
Financial Health 78 #9 of 38 75 #30 of 115 87 #6 of 38
Shareholder Returns 55 #10 of 21 50 #41 of 81 –
Overall 63 68 74
  • AKAM ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • UI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • XNET ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAKAMUIXNETSPY
1 month -13.6%+4.3%-23.4% -0.8%
3 months -12.7%+8.4%-33.7% +3.5%
6 months +2.7%-42.0%-39.9% +7.0%
Year to date +12.9%+5.8%-45.8% +12.2%
1 year +31.2%-20.4%-58.7% +13.0%
3 years -3.4%+401.8%+161.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -1.2%+71.3%+37.8% +23.1%
5 years -5.6%+95.5%+32.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.1%+14.4%+5.9% +11.0%
10 years +45.5%+1,006.8%-26.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +3.8%+27.2%-3.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAKAMUIXNETSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.5%53.8%52.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.4%59.5%57.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.411.641.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.51-0.38-1.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.8%-70.0%-68.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.9%-46.0%-59.1% -1.8%
52-week high $161.14$1,084.50$9.40 $779.14
52-week low $71.97$515.44$3.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAKAMUIXNET
P/E now vs peer median 34.7xmedian 29.6x 36.9xmedian 32.0x -3.3xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 4.2x 10.8xmedian 2.8x 0.6xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.5xmedian 24.2x 28.9xmedian 19.4x —median 24.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 15.1x 39.0xmedian 29.0x —median 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 3.9x 24.6xmedian 2.9x —median 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median -6.96median 0.38 1.12median 1.13 0.04median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAKAMUIXNET
Revenue $4.32B $3.27B $424.54M
Gross profit $2.48B $1.51B $230.55M
Operating income $455.68M $1.19B $5.67M
Net income $410.97M $960.30M $146.48M
Free cash flow $956.10M $908.94M –
R&D $554.57M $204.17M $82.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.67 $15.85 $-1.13
Cash & equivalents $1.48B $522.58M $125.83M
Total debt $1.71B $180.81M $270.21M
Shares (diluted) 153.69M 60.57M 63.29M
Enterprise value $7.80B $34.87B -$643.59M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAKAMUIXNET
P/E 34.7x 36.9x -3.3x
P/FCF 14.8x 39.0x –
P/Operating cash flow 9.8x 38.2x –
P/S 3.3x 10.8x 0.6x
P/B 3.0x 24.6x –
P/Tangible book 3.4x 24.6x –
EV/EBITDA 10.5x 28.9x –
EV/EBIT 27.4x 29.4x 3.7x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 10.6x 0.0x
EV/FCF 13.1x 38.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 8.6x 37.5x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -6.96 1.12 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAKAMUIXNET
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.9% 27.2% 40.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.7% 19.0% 3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.9% 35.3% 35.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.8% 25.7% 13.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -13.2% 41.8% 126.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -9.0% 29.6% -7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.2% 34.9% -79.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -4.9% 33.1% 108.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -8.5% 34.8% -110.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.0% 33.0% -88.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.0% 45.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 103.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.6% 44.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.5% 95.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAKAMUIXNET
Gross margin 57.5% 46.2% 54.3%
EBITDA margin 27.6% 36.8% –
Operating margin 10.5% 36.2% 1.3%
Pretax margin 11.5% 36.1% -20.6%
Net margin 9.5% 29.3% -16.9%
FCF margin 22.1% 27.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 33.5% 28.4% –
Return on equity 8.5% 72.7% –
Return on assets 3.1% 49.1% 11.3%
Return on invested capital – 72.8% –
Return on capital employed 4.3% 89.1% 0.5%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.5x 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 11.8% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAKAMUIXNET
Debt / assets 11.3% – 4.8%
Debt / equity 0.4x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.4x – –
Debt / FCF 1.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 68.5% 34.5% 16.9%
Equity / assets 31.5% 65.5% –
Interest coverage 13.7x – 2.8x
Current ratio 1.6x 2.9x 2.0x
Quick ratio 1.5x 1.5x 1.9x
Cash ratio 1.2x 1.0x 1.7x
Altman Z-score 1.69 32.88 1.88

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAKAMUIXNET
Dividend yield – 0.6% –
Net buyback yield -0.8% – –
Shareholder yield -0.8% 0.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAKAMUIXNET
Forward P/E 15.6xFY2026 31.0xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.31FY2026 $18.88FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY -11.4%FY2026 +18.4%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after -0.2% +9.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.28BFY2026 $4.12BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +1.8%FY2026 +25.9%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after +27.3% +5.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAKAMUIXNET
Held by institutions 100.0% 4.9% 11.0%
Institutions holding 801 354 52
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +8.0% -8.7%
Institutions buying 430 163 35
Institutions selling 282 139 14
Buyers to sellers 1.52 1.17 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AKAMUIXNET
AKAM 1.00 -0.11 0.17
UI -0.11 1.00 0.16
XNET 0.17 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AKAM, UI and XNET?

Ubiquiti (UI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Akamai Technologies (AKAM) $14.39B, Ubiquiti (UI) $36.33B, Xunlei (XNET) $239.19M.

Which stock is cheaper, AKAM, UI and XNET?

Akamai Technologies (AKAM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Akamai Technologies (AKAM) 35.0x, Ubiquiti (UI) 37.8x, Xunlei (XNET) -3.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Akamai Technologies (AKAM) is cheapest (Akamai Technologies (AKAM) 15.6x, Ubiquiti (UI) 31.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Xunlei (XNET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Akamai Technologies (AKAM) +5.9%, Ubiquiti (UI) +27.2%, Xunlei (XNET) +40.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ubiquiti (UI) has the highest net margin (Akamai Technologies (AKAM) 9.5%, Ubiquiti (UI) 29.3%, Xunlei (XNET) -16.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Akamai Technologies (AKAM) returned the most: Akamai Technologies (AKAM) +31.2%, Ubiquiti (UI) -20.4%, Xunlei (XNET) -58.7%. Over five years, Ubiquiti (UI) compounded fastest (Akamai Technologies (AKAM) -1.1%/yr, Ubiquiti (UI) +14.4%/yr, Xunlei (XNET) +5.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xunlei (XNET) has been the steadiest (Akamai Technologies (AKAM) 61.5%, Ubiquiti (UI) 53.8%, Xunlei (XNET) 52.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AKAM, UI and XNET?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ubiquiti (UI) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.