AJG vs CTAS vs MRSH Stock Comparison

Arthur J. Gallagher, Cintas and Marsh & Mclennan Companies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
$267.78 +17.6% 1M +2.2% 1Y
Market cap
$68.63B
P/E
37.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
1.03%
Insurance Brokers Financial Services
CTAS Cintas Corp
$218.07 +10.3% 1M +18.6% 1Y
Market cap
$87.12B
P/E
42.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.86%
Facility Services Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 8, Marsh & Mclennan Companies 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAJGCTASMRSHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $68.63B $87.12B $93.59B MRSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 37.2x 42.3x 23.2x MRSH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.5x 37.3x 19.3x MRSH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +9.5% +7.6% CTAS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 17.8% 14.2% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 28.2% 13.1% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.7x 2.7x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.03% 0.86% 1.92% MRSH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.2% +18.6% +9.5% CTAS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.8%/yr +15.0%/yr +3.4%/yr CTAS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.6% 23.7% 25.9% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 26/100 61/100 32/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

AJGCTASMRSH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAJGCTASMRSH
Valuation 6 #112 of 119 21 #90 of 113 9 #108 of 119
Growth – 73 #27 of 96 16 #96 of 114
Profitability – 99 #2 of 91 70 #33 of 106
Financial Health 60 #42 of 104 69 #38 of 122 10 #94 of 104
Shareholder Returns 11 #94 of 105 43 #38 of 66 58 #45 of 105
Overall 26 61 32
  • AJG ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • MRSH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAJGCTASMRSHSPY
1 month +17.6%+10.3%+15.6% +0.7%
3 months +4.4%+5.5%+2.9% +3.7%
6 months +29.7%+24.8%+17.5% +7.1%
Year to date +3.5%+16.0%+6.2% +12.8%
1 year +2.2%+18.6%+9.5% +11.9%
3 years +14.6%+73.5%+4.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year +4.6%+20.2%+1.5% +22.8%
5 years +59.7%+101.4%+18.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year +9.8%+15.0%+3.4% +10.9%
10 years +454.1%+723.4%+210.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +18.7%+23.5%+12.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAJGCTASMRSHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.6%23.7%25.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.8%23.9%24.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.390.10-0.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.070.780.37 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.9%-28.2%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.6%-3.5%-1.2% -1.2%
52-week high $272.04$225.93$199.34 $779.14
52-week low $192.00$163.55$157.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAJGCTASMRSH
P/E now vs peer median 37.2xmedian 10.7x 42.3xmedian 21.9x 23.2xmedian 10.7x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 1.4x 7.5xmedian 0.9x 3.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.5x 27.8xmedian 11.9x 16.0xmedian 7.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.6xmedian 8.5x 42.8xmedian 14.4x 22.5xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.5x 16.7xmedian 2.4x 6.3xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.60 2.79median 0.97 3.47median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAJGCTASMRSH
Revenue – $11.56B $28.46B
Gross profit – $5.89B –
Operating income – $2.70B $6.09B
Net income – $2.06B $4.12B
Free cash flow – $2.03B $4.15B
EPS (diluted) – $5.10 $8.44
Cash & equivalents $1.21B $243.60M $1.84B
Total debt – $2.43B $20.53B
Shares (diluted) 258.70M 404.29M 479.00M
Enterprise value $68.67B $86.21B $85.98B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAJGCTASMRSH
P/E 37.2x 42.3x 23.2x
P/FCF 25.6x 42.8x 22.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 35.8x 20.9x
P/S 3.7x 7.5x 3.3x
P/B 2.9x 16.7x 6.3x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 17.7x 9.0x
EV/EBITDA – 27.8x 16.0x
EV/EBIT – 33.1x 18.4x
EV/Revenue – 7.7x 3.9x
EV/FCF – 43.9x 27.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 36.7x 25.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.79 3.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAJGCTASMRSH
Revenue growth (1Y) – 9.5% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 8.7% 8.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 11.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 11.8% -1.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – 11.3% -1.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 14.3% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – 12.7% 1.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 15.2% 6.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 14.8% -12.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% 4.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 19.5% -13.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.4% 5.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAJGCTASMRSH
Gross margin – 51.0% –
EBITDA margin – 27.8% 24.6%
Operating margin – 23.4% 21.4%
Pretax margin – 22.5% 18.9%
Net margin – 17.8% 14.2%
FCF margin – 17.6% 14.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 21.1% 15.7%
Return on equity – 39.8% 27.2%
Return on assets – 19.5% 6.9%
Return on invested capital – 28.2% 13.1%
Return on capital employed – 34.2% 16.2%
Asset turnover – 1.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.2x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAJGCTASMRSH
Debt / assets – 22.8% 34.3%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.7x 2.7x
Debt / FCF – 1.2x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 69.6% 51.1% 75.1%
Equity / assets 30.4% 48.9% 24.9%
Interest coverage – 25.3x 6.3x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.5x 1.1x
Quick ratio – 0.7x 0.5x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 13.42 2.79

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAJGCTASMRSH
Dividend yield 1.0% 0.9% 1.9%
Net buyback yield – 1.1% 3.1%
Shareholder yield 1.0% 2.0% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 35.2% 43.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6% 43.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 14.8% 8.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 15.5% 13.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAJGCTASMRSH
Forward P/E 19.5xFY2026 37.3xFY2026 19.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.76FY2026 $5.85FY2026 $10.21FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +28.7%FY2026 +18.4%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.3% +10.4% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.07BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026 $30.28BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.9%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.7% +6.8% +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAJGCTASMRSH
Held by institutions 93.0% 67.6% 93.9%
Institutions holding 1,291 1,432 1,498
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.0% +6.4% +2.8%
Institutions buying 621 659 626
Institutions selling 484 576 652
Buyers to sellers 1.28 1.14 0.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AJGCTASMRSH
AJG 1.00 0.44 0.81
CTAS 0.44 1.00 0.44
MRSH 0.81 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AJG, CTAS and MRSH?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) $68.63B, Cintas (CTAS) $87.12B, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) $93.59B.

Which stock is cheaper, AJG, CTAS and MRSH?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) 37.2x, Cintas (CTAS) 42.3x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 23.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is cheapest (Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) 19.5x, Cintas (CTAS) 37.3x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 19.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cintas (CTAS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 14.2%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cintas (CTAS) returned the most: Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) +2.2%, Cintas (CTAS) +18.6%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +9.5%. Over five years, Cintas (CTAS) compounded fastest (Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) +9.8%/yr, Cintas (CTAS) +15.0%/yr, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +3.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) has the highest dividend yield: Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) 1.03%, Cintas (CTAS) 0.86%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 1.92%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) 32.6%, Cintas (CTAS) 23.7%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AJG, CTAS and MRSH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.