AISP vs ODYS vs NEON Stock Comparison

Airship AI Holdings, Odysight.ai and Neonode Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ODYS Odysight.ai Inc.
$2.07 -33.9% 1M -41.4% 1Y
Market cap
$32.59M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.02M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
2 wins
NEON Neonode Inc.
$0.71 -22.8% 1M -78.0% 1Y
Market cap
$12.20M
P/E
1.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.04M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Neonode leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Neonode 4, Airship AI Holdings 2, Odysight.ai 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAISPODYSNEONLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $77.83M $32.59M $12.20M AISP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.0x -1.9x 1.5x NEON
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% -23.9% -21.7% AISP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 144.6% -565.0% 398.1% NEON
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.8% -41.4% -78.0% ODYS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.2%/yr -24.1%/yr -38.9%/yr ODYS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.7% 74.4% 72.9% NEON
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 25/100 65/100 NEON

Percentile Scorecard

AISPODYSNEON

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAISPODYSNEON
Valuation 59 #51 of 124 7 #115 of 124 76 #31 of 124
Growth 84 #19 of 113 16 #95 of 113 36 #73 of 113
Profitability 44 #62 of 109 7 #101 of 109 65 #39 of 109
Financial Health 35 #83 of 127 91 #12 of 127 86 #19 of 127
Shareholder Returns 9 #59 of 65 2 #64 of 65 –
Overall 46 25 65
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ODYS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NEON ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAISPODYSNEONSPY
1 month +25.8%-33.9%-22.8% -0.2%
3 months +18.7%-52.4%-7.8% +3.9%
6 months +1.8%-56.0%-56.4% +8.2%
Year to date -20.8%-37.3%-59.2% +12.9%
1 year -53.8%-41.4%-78.0% +12.3%
3 years -78.5%-23.3%-38.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -40.1%-8.5%-14.9% +23.3%
5 years -76.6%-74.8%-91.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -25.2%-24.1%-38.9% +10.9%
10 years ——-94.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——-25.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAISPODYSNEONSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.7%74.4%72.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.7%71.3%81.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.540.252.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.68-0.56-1.07 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.6%-82.8%-97.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.8%-71.6%-78.0% -1.2%
52-week high $4.96$7.30$3.23 $779.14
52-week low $1.71$2.07$0.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAISPODYSNEON
P/E now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 38.6x -1.9xmedian 38.6x 1.5xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 4.4x 11.2xmedian 4.4x 5.8xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x -0.5xmedian 34.5x -1.3xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -22.5xmedian 29.4x -2.5xmedian 29.4x -1.1xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 3.3x 1.3xmedian 3.3x 0.6xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.28 -0.28median 1.28 0.03median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAISPODYSNEON
Revenue $18.15M $3.02M $2.04M
Gross profit $10.19M $871.00K $2.02M
Operating income -$6.55M -$18.14M $7.05M
Net income $26.24M -$17.04M $8.13M
Free cash flow -$3.51M -$13.76M -$11.28M
R&D $3.31M $9.64M $3.64M
EPS (diluted) $0.76 $-1.07 $0.48
Cash & equivalents $12.37M $25.68M $21.32M
Shares (diluted) 34.44M 15.90M 16.78M
Enterprise value $35.39M -$92.36M -$69.29M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAISPODYSNEON
P/E 3.0x -1.9x 1.5x
P/FCF -22.5x -2.5x -1.1x
P/Operating cash flow -22.5x -2.5x -1.1x
P/S 4.3x 11.2x 5.8x
P/B -9.1x 1.3x 0.6x
P/Tangible book -9.1x 1.3x 0.6x
EV/EBITDA – -0.5x -1.3x
EV/EBIT -10.2x -0.5x -1.3x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 2.7x -4.6x
EV/FCF -19.0x -0.6x 0.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -19.0x -0.6x 0.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 -0.28 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAISPODYSNEON
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% -23.9% -21.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 65.5% -28.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.4% -24.7% -19.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 42.6% -25.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% -45.0% 200.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% -24.3% 48.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 159.6% -44.8% 228.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 62.4% -21.6% 53.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 155.2% -4.2% 228.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.4% 6.9% 52.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% -66.8% -100.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% -31.0% -42.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% -66.4% -101.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% -30.3% -42.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAISPODYSNEON
Gross margin 56.2% 28.9% 98.8%
EBITDA margin – -597.6% 348.6%
Operating margin -36.1% -601.5% 345.6%
Pretax margin -36.1% -601.5% 383.2%
Net margin 144.6% -565.0% 398.1%
FCF margin -19.3% -456.4% -552.8%
Operating cash flow margin -19.3% -454.5% -548.4%
Return on equity – -66.5% 37.2%
Return on assets -35.5% -58.6% 33.5%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -50.0% -64.9% 31.8%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 0.8x -1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% 102.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAISPODYSNEON
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 148.6% 12.3% 12.2%
Equity / assets -48.6% 87.7% 87.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.2x 9.2x 10.9x
Quick ratio 3.0x 8.9x 10.6x
Cash ratio 2.3x 8.6x 10.3x
Altman Z-score -1.46 1.73 -8.42

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAISPODYSNEON
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -12.2% -62.5% –
Shareholder yield -12.2% -62.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAISPODYSNEON
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 $-1.23FY2026 $-0.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -107.9%FY2026 – -177.1%FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.14MFY2026 $1.78MFY2026 $3.71MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +83.7%FY2026 -41.0%FY2026 +76.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +36.3% +139.2% +26.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAISPODYSNEON
Held by institutions 14.5% – 11.6%
Institutions holding 79 – 51
Change in shares held, QoQ -29.3% – -35.0%
Institutions buying 41 – 25
Institutions selling 27 – 24
Buyers to sellers 1.52 – 1.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AISPODYSNEON
AISP 1.00 -0.01 0.35
ODYS -0.01 1.00 0.04
NEON 0.35 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AISP, ODYS and NEON?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $77.83M, Odysight.ai (ODYS) $32.59M, Neonode (NEON) $12.20M.

Which stock is cheaper, AISP, ODYS and NEON?

Neonode (NEON) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 3.0x, Odysight.ai (ODYS) -1.9x, Neonode (NEON) 1.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) +32.2%, Odysight.ai (ODYS) -23.9%, Neonode (NEON) -21.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neonode (NEON) has the highest net margin (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 144.6%, Odysight.ai (ODYS) -565.0%, Neonode (NEON) 398.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Odysight.ai (ODYS) returned the most: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -53.8%, Odysight.ai (ODYS) -41.4%, Neonode (NEON) -78.0%. Over five years, Odysight.ai (ODYS) compounded fastest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -25.2%/yr, Odysight.ai (ODYS) -24.1%/yr, Neonode (NEON) -38.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Neonode (NEON) has been the steadiest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.7%, Odysight.ai (ODYS) 74.4%, Neonode (NEON) 72.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AISP, ODYS and NEON?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Neonode (NEON) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.