AISP vs HOLO vs GRRR Stock Comparison

Airship AI Holdings, MicroCloud Hologram and Gorilla Technology Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Gorilla Technology leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Gorilla Technology 3, Airship AI Holdings 3, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAISPHOLOGRRRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $75.09M $15.48M $204.01M GRRR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.9x — -4.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% — +50.4% GRRR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 144.6% — -35.4% AISP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -2.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.1x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.3% -72.0% -35.8% GRRR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.3%/yr -89.1%/yr -36.8%/yr AISP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.7% 67.0% 87.8% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 — 40/100 AISP

Percentile Scorecard

AISPHOLOGRRR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAISPHOLOGRRR
Valuation 59 #52 of 124 – 46 #68 of 124
Growth 85 #18 of 113 – 72 #32 of 113
Profitability 43 #63 of 109 – 32 #75 of 109
Financial Health 35 #83 of 127 99 #2 of 127 41 #75 of 127
Shareholder Returns 8 #58 of 63 – 10 #57 of 63
Overall 46 – 40
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GRRR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAISPHOLOGRRRSPY
1 month +26.1%-24.7%-26.5% +0.9%
3 months +32.7%-21.3%-5.4% +5.9%
6 months +2.7%-21.3%-28.5% +8.5%
Year to date -21.5%-53.8%-7.7% +13.3%
1 year -53.3%-72.0%-35.8% +12.4%
3 years -78.7%-100.0%+24.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year -40.3%-93.5%+7.5% +23.5%
5 years -76.7%-100.0%-89.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year -25.3%-89.1%-36.8% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureAISPHOLOGRRRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.7%67.0%87.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.6%74.3%93.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.542.452.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.68-1.07-0.41 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.6%-100.0%-99.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.3%-73.0%-53.7% -0.9%
52-week high $4.86$4.52$21.78 $779.14
52-week low $1.71$1.16$7.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAISPHOLOGRRR
P/E now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 37.9x —median 37.9x -4.5xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x 1.9xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x —median 34.5x -3.1xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -22.3xmedian 26.6x —median 26.6x -39.9xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 3.4x 0.0xmedian 3.4x 1.5xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.24 —median 1.24 —median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAISPHOLOGRRR
Revenue $18.15M – $140.40M
Gross profit $10.19M – $24.27M
Operating income -$6.55M – -$51.78M
Net income $26.24M – -$51.45M
Free cash flow -$3.51M – -$6.62M
R&D $3.31M – $4.02M
EPS (diluted) $0.76 – $-2.23
Cash & equivalents $12.37M $110.42M $179.36M
Total debt – $1.87M $6.95B
Shares (diluted) 34.44M 13.18M 22.25M
Enterprise value $32.65M -$2.17B -$287.44M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOGRRR
P/E 3.0x – -4.5x
P/FCF -22.3x – -39.9x
P/Operating cash flow -22.3x – -12.9x
P/S 4.3x – 1.9x
P/B -9.1x 0.0x 1.5x
P/Tangible book -9.1x 0.0x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – – -3.1x
EV/EBIT -10.0x – -3.0x
EV/Revenue 3.6x – 1.1x
EV/FCF -18.8x – -23.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -18.8x – -7.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOGRRR
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% – 50.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.4% – -26.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% – 33.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 159.6% – 34.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 62.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 155.2% – 68.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.4% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% – 33.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% – 78.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOGRRR
Gross margin 56.2% – 17.3%
EBITDA margin – – -36.2%
Operating margin -36.1% – -36.9%
Pretax margin -36.1% – -32.9%
Net margin 144.6% – -35.4%
FCF margin -19.3% – -4.7%
Operating cash flow margin -19.3% – -14.6%
Return on equity – – -29.1%
Return on assets -35.5% – -15.7%
Return on invested capital – – -2.9%
Return on capital employed -50.0% – -30.8%
Asset turnover 1.0x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x – 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOGRRR
Debt / assets – 0.0% 18.8%
Debt / equity – 0.0x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.1x
Debt / FCF – – -11.1x
Liabilities / assets 148.6% 2.9% 56.2%
Equity / assets -48.6% 97.1% 43.8%
Interest coverage – – -21.8x
Current ratio 3.2x 34.6x 2.2x
Quick ratio 3.0x 107.3x 2.1x
Cash ratio 2.3x 107.0x 1.2x
Altman Z-score -1.48 – 0.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAISPHOLOGRRR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -12.3% – -11.2%
Shareholder yield -12.3% – -11.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAISPHOLOGRRR
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 – $-2.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -107.9%FY2026 – -396.6%FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.14MFY2026 – $201.05MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +83.7%FY2026 – +98.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +36.3% – +217.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAISPHOLOGRRR
Held by institutions 14.5% 3.0% 26.6%
Institutions holding 79 16 71
Change in shares held, QoQ -29.3% +135.7% +79.3%
Institutions buying 41 11 50
Institutions selling 27 0 13
Buyers to sellers 1.52 – 3.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AISPHOLOGRRR
AISP 1.00 0.51 0.43
HOLO 0.51 1.00 0.41
GRRR 0.43 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AISP, HOLO and GRRR?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $75.09M, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.48M, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) $204.01M.

Which company is growing faster?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) +32.2%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) +50.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has the highest net margin (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 144.6%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -35.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gorilla Technology (GRRR) returned the most: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -53.3%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -72.0%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -35.8%. Over five years, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) compounded fastest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -25.3%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.1%/yr, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -36.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.7%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.0%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) 87.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AISP, HOLO and GRRR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.