AISP vs GRRR vs HOLO Stock Comparison

Airship AI Holdings, Gorilla Technology and MicroCloud Hologram Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Gorilla Technology leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Gorilla Technology 3, Airship AI Holdings 3, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAISPGRRRHOLOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $78.68M $204.70M $15.68M GRRR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.0x -4.1x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% +50.4% — GRRR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 144.6% -35.4% — AISP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -2.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -57.6% -49.8% -74.0% GRRR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.1%/yr -39.0%/yr -89.2%/yr AISP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.6% 87.3% 67.2% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 40/100 — AISP

Percentile Scorecard

AISPGRRRHOLO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAISPGRRRHOLO
Valuation 61 #49 of 124 46 #68 of 124 –
Growth 84 #19 of 113 73 #31 of 113 –
Profitability 43 #63 of 110 32 #75 of 110 –
Financial Health 34 #85 of 129 40 #78 of 129 99 #2 of 129
Shareholder Returns 9 #61 of 67 8 #62 of 67 –
Overall 46 40 –
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GRRR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAISPGRRRHOLOSPY
1 month +18.7%-39.7%-30.5% -0.8%
3 months +9.6%-30.3%-29.7% +3.5%
6 months -9.2%-34.5%-32.9% +7.0%
Year to date -25.3%-22.6%-56.1% +12.2%
1 year -57.6%-49.8%-74.0% +13.0%
3 years -79.7%+4.1%-100.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -41.2%+1.3%-93.7% +23.1%
5 years -77.9%-91.5%-100.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -26.1%-39.0%-89.2% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureAISPGRRRHOLOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.6%87.3%67.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.7%93.2%74.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.532.642.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.73-0.57-1.10 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.6%-99.4%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.5%-61.2%-74.6% -1.8%
52-week high $4.96$21.78$4.57 $779.14
52-week low $1.71$7.44$1.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAISPGRRRHOLO
P/E now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 38.1x -3.8xmedian 38.1x —median 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 4.3x 1.6xmedian 4.3x —median 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 35.4x -2.3xmedian 35.4x —median 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -21.2xmedian 27.1x -33.4xmedian 27.1x —median 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median -8.6xmedian 3.4x 1.3xmedian 3.4x 0.0xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.27 —median 1.27 —median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAISPGRRRHOLO
Revenue $18.15M $140.40M –
Gross profit $10.19M $24.27M –
Operating income -$6.55M -$51.78M –
Net income $26.24M -$51.45M –
Free cash flow -$3.51M -$6.62M –
R&D $3.31M $4.02M –
EPS (diluted) $0.76 $-2.23 –
Cash & equivalents $12.37M $179.36M $110.42M
Total debt – $6.95B $1.87M
Shares (diluted) 34.44M 22.25M 13.18M
Enterprise value $36.25M -$286.74M -$2.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRHOLO
P/E 2.8x -3.8x –
P/FCF -21.2x -33.4x –
P/Operating cash flow -21.2x -10.8x –
P/S 4.1x 1.6x –
P/B -8.6x 1.3x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -8.6x 1.3x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA – -2.3x –
EV/EBIT -9.5x -2.2x –
EV/Revenue 3.4x 0.8x –
EV/FCF -17.7x -17.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow -17.7x -5.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRHOLO
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% 50.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.4% -26.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% 33.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 159.6% 34.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 62.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 155.2% 68.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.4% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% 33.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% 78.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRHOLO
Gross margin 56.2% 17.3% –
EBITDA margin – -36.2% –
Operating margin -36.1% -36.9% –
Pretax margin -36.1% -32.9% –
Net margin 144.6% -35.4% –
FCF margin -19.3% -4.7% –
Operating cash flow margin -19.3% -14.6% –
Return on equity – -29.1% –
Return on assets -35.5% -15.7% –
Return on invested capital – -2.9% –
Return on capital employed -50.0% -30.8% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRHOLO
Debt / assets – 18.8% 0.0%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x –
Debt / FCF – -11.1x –
Liabilities / assets 148.6% 56.2% 2.9%
Equity / assets -48.6% 43.8% 97.1%
Interest coverage – -21.8x –
Current ratio 3.2x 2.2x 34.6x
Quick ratio 3.0x 2.1x 107.3x
Cash ratio 2.3x 1.2x 107.0x
Altman Z-score -1.56 0.37 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAISPGRRRHOLO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -12.9% -13.4% –
Shareholder yield -12.9% -13.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAISPGRRRHOLO
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 $-2.61FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -107.9%FY2026 -396.6%FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.14MFY2026 $201.05MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +83.7%FY2026 +98.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +36.3% +217.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAISPGRRRHOLO
Held by institutions 14.5% 26.6% 3.0%
Institutions holding 79 71 16
Change in shares held, QoQ -29.3% +79.3% +135.7%
Institutions buying 41 50 11
Institutions selling 27 13 0
Buyers to sellers 1.52 3.85 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AISPGRRRHOLO
AISP 1.00 0.43 0.50
GRRR 0.43 1.00 0.40
HOLO 0.50 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AISP, GRRR and HOLO?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $78.68M, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) $204.70M, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.68M.

Which company is growing faster?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) +32.2%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) +50.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has the highest net margin (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 144.6%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -35.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gorilla Technology (GRRR) returned the most: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -57.6%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -49.8%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -74.0%. Over five years, Airship AI Holdings (AISP) compounded fastest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -26.1%/yr, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -39.0%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.6%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) 87.3%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AISP, GRRR and HOLO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.