AISP vs GLAI vs HOLO Stock Comparison

Airship AI Holdings, Global AI and MicroCloud Hologram Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLAI Global AI, Inc.
$0.95 +18.7% 1M +115.9% 1Y
Market cap
$147.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$184.28K
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Global AI leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Global AI 4, Airship AI Holdings 2, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAISPGLAIHOLOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $78.87M $147.15M $15.81M GLAI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3.0x -92.6x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% +34.5% — GLAI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 144.6% -862.3% — AISP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.8% +115.9% -73.7% GLAI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.2%/yr +54.0%/yr -89.2%/yr GLAI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.7% 254.6% 67.1% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 14/100 — AISP

Percentile Scorecard

AISPGLAIHOLO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAISPGLAIHOLO
Valuation 59 #51 of 124 27 #91 of 124 –
Growth 84 #19 of 113 14 #97 of 113 –
Profitability 44 #62 of 109 7 #102 of 109 –
Financial Health 35 #83 of 127 8 #117 of 127 99 #2 of 127
Shareholder Returns 9 #59 of 65 – –
Overall 46 14 –
  • AISP ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GLAI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAISPGLAIHOLOSPY
1 month +25.8%+18.7%-28.1% -0.2%
3 months +18.7%-12.0%-25.9% +3.9%
6 months +1.8%+35.7%-28.1% +8.2%
Year to date -20.8%-5.9%-54.5% +12.9%
1 year -53.8%+115.9%-73.7% +12.3%
3 years -78.5%+295.8%-100.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -40.1%+58.2%-93.6% +23.3%
5 years -76.6%+763.6%-100.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -25.2%+54.0%-89.2% +10.9%
10 years —+216.7%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+12.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAISPGLAIHOLOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.7%254.6%67.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.7%306.4%74.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.54-1.152.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.680.46-1.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.6%-92.9%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.8%-77.1%-73.7% -1.2%
52-week high $4.96$4.15$4.57 $779.14
52-week low $1.71$0.35$1.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAISPGLAIHOLO
P/E now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 38.6x -92.6xmedian 38.6x —median 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 4.4x 798.5xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x -94.4xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -22.5xmedian 29.4x -83.8xmedian 29.4x —median 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 3.3x -43.3xmedian 3.3x 0.0xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 1.28 0.36median 1.28 —median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAISPGLAIHOLO
Revenue $18.15M $184.28K –
Gross profit $10.19M $83.10K –
Operating income -$6.55M -$1.59M –
Net income $26.24M -$1.59M –
Free cash flow -$3.51M -$1.76M –
R&D $3.31M $1.82M –
EPS (diluted) $0.76 $-0.01 –
Cash & equivalents $12.37M $40.56K $110.42M
Total debt – – $1.87M
Shares (diluted) 34.44M 309.80M 13.18M
Enterprise value $36.43M $146.90M -$2.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAISPGLAIHOLO
P/E 3.0x -92.6x –
P/FCF -22.5x -83.8x –
P/Operating cash flow -22.5x -88.9x –
P/S 4.3x 798.5x –
P/B -9.1x -43.3x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -9.1x -19.7x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA – -94.4x –
EV/EBIT -10.2x -92.6x –
EV/Revenue 3.7x 798.3x –
EV/FCF -19.0x -83.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow -19.0x -88.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 0.36 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAISPGLAIHOLO
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% 34.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 44.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 42.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% -1.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.1% -555.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 159.6% 2.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 62.4% -405.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 155.2% 51.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.4% -255.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% -96.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% -529.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.1% -103.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% -542.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAISPGLAIHOLO
Gross margin 56.2% 45.1% –
EBITDA margin – -845.7% –
Operating margin -36.1% -862.3% –
Pretax margin -36.1% -859.5% –
Net margin 144.6% -862.3% –
FCF margin -19.3% -952.7% –
Operating cash flow margin -19.3% -898.6% –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets -35.5% -36.9% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -50.0% – –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 13.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAISPGLAIHOLO
Debt / assets – – 0.0%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 148.6% 176.0% 2.9%
Equity / assets -48.6% -76.0% 97.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.2x 0.0x 34.6x
Quick ratio 3.0x 0.0x 107.3x
Cash ratio 2.3x 0.0x 107.0x
Altman Z-score -1.46 5.87 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAISPGLAIHOLO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -12.2% – –
Shareholder yield -12.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAISPGLAIHOLO
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY -107.9%FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.14MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +83.7%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +36.3% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAISPGLAIHOLO
Held by institutions 14.5% – 3.0%
Institutions holding 79 – 16
Change in shares held, QoQ -29.3% – +135.7%
Institutions buying 41 – 11
Institutions selling 27 – 0
Buyers to sellers 1.52 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AISPGLAIHOLO
AISP 1.00 0.01 0.50
GLAI 0.01 1.00 -0.10
HOLO 0.50 -0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AISP, GLAI and HOLO?

Global AI (GLAI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) $78.87M, Global AI (GLAI) $147.15M, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.81M.

Which company is growing faster?

Global AI (GLAI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) +32.2%, Global AI (GLAI) +34.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Airship AI Holdings (AISP) has the highest net margin (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 144.6%, Global AI (GLAI) -862.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Global AI (GLAI) returned the most: Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -53.8%, Global AI (GLAI) +115.9%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -73.7%. Over five years, Global AI (GLAI) compounded fastest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) -25.2%/yr, Global AI (GLAI) +54.0%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (Airship AI Holdings (AISP) 78.7%, Global AI (GLAI) 254.6%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AISP, GLAI and HOLO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Global AI (GLAI) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.