AIFF vs HUM vs PHG Stock Comparison

Firefly Neuroscience, Humana and Koninklijke Philips Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
HUM Humana Inc
$417.04 +4.7% 1M +43.5% 1Y
Market cap
$50.01B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$145.68B
Div. yield
–
Managed Care Healthcare
4 wins
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$26.56 +6.4% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$25.21B
P/E
13.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Koninklijke Philips leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Koninklijke Philips 6, Humana 4, Firefly Neuroscience 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAIFFHUMPHGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $20.76M $50.01B $25.21B HUM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.2x 39.1x 13.7x PHG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 48.2x 13.4x PHG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +320.3% +18.3% +6.1% AIFF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -524.5% 0.9% 8.9% PHG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.7% 11.5% PHG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -2.7x 1.8x HUM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -54.8% +43.5% -7.9% HUM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -61.1%/yr -1.9%/yr -10.8%/yr HUM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 160.0% 48.1% 28.8% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 45/100 80/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

AIFFHUMPHG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAIFFHUMPHG
Valuation 15 #194 of 228 58 #11 of 25 98 #6 of 228
Growth 61 #87 of 221 13 #21 of 24 96 #11 of 221
Profitability 14 #179 of 208 44 #14 of 24 96 #10 of 208
Financial Health 79 #52 of 239 68 #9 of 26 31 #166 of 239
Shareholder Returns 20 #110 of 137 40 #10 of 16 79 #29 of 137
Overall 38 45 80
  • AIFF ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • HUM ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • PHG ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAIFFHUMPHGSPY
1 month -53.2%+4.7%+6.4% -0.8%
3 months -20.3%+9.4%+6.2% +3.5%
6 months -55.7%+86.5%-3.6% +7.0%
Year to date +6.8%+62.8%-1.9% +12.2%
1 year -54.8%+43.5%-7.9% +13.0%
3 years -83.7%-18.3%+43.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -45.4%-6.5%+12.8% +23.1%
5 years -99.1%-9.1%-43.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year -61.1%-1.9%-10.8% +11.0%
10 years -79.1%+138.8%-11.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year -14.5%+9.1%-1.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAIFFHUMPHGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 160.0%48.1%28.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 109.1%52.9%28.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.500.580.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.340.90-0.27 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.6%-70.9%-75.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -68.9%-3.8%-19.3% -1.8%
52-week high $3.02$433.45$32.91 $779.14
52-week low $0.64$163.67$23.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAIFFHUMPHG
P/E now vs peer median -2.0xmedian 30.6x 39.1xmedian 24.3x 13.7xmedian 30.6x
P/S now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 3.0x 0.3xmedian 0.3x 1.2xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 17.5x 11.7xmedian 13.5x 8.1xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 23.3x 25.7xmedian 15.6x 5.9xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.4x 2.6xmedian 2.5x 2.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -0.03median 0.87 -1.46median 1.33 0.32median 0.87

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAIFFHUMPHG
Revenue $1.80M $145.68B $20.60B
Gross profit $802.00K $19.89B $16.03B
Operating income -$9.14M $2.71B $2.65B
Net income -$9.11M $1.29B $1.39B
Free cash flow -$7.20M $1.95B $4.34B
R&D $1.78M – $2.00B
EPS (diluted) $-0.70 $10.56 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $9.23M $6.89B $2.04B
Total debt – $54.48B $9.51B
Shares (diluted) 13.50M 121.14M 962.50M
Enterprise value $1.33M -$37.85B $14.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAIFFHUMPHG
P/E -2.0x 39.1x 13.7x
P/FCF -2.7x 25.7x 5.9x
P/Operating cash flow -2.8x 19.7x 9.6x
P/S 10.8x 0.3x 1.2x
P/B 1.3x 2.6x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 2.6x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA -1.1x 11.7x 8.1x
EV/EBIT -1.1x 15.1x 12.4x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 0.3x 1.6x
EV/FCF -1.4x 20.9x 7.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.4x 16.1x 12.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.03 -1.46 0.32

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAIFFHUMPHG
Revenue growth (1Y) 320.3% 18.3% 6.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -40.3% 13.8% 2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 99.0% 7.5% 82.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -32.6% 3.6% 6.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.8% -17.9% 121.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -52.0% -15.3% 52.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 60.1% -18.3% 293.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.8% -27.4% 35.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 81.8% -19.1% 539.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 69.0% -26.9% 42.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.1% -13.4% 116.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.4% -42.3% 53.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 17.6% -20.1% 54.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.3% -45.6% 45.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAIFFHUMPHG
Gross margin 44.6% 13.7% 77.8%
EBITDA margin -496.9% 2.4% 19.8%
Operating margin -508.1% 1.9% 12.9%
Pretax margin -506.2% 1.1% 11.9%
Net margin -524.5% 0.9% 8.9%
FCF margin -400.2% 1.3% 21.1%
Operating cash flow margin -388.6% 1.7% 12.9%
Return on equity -78.8% 6.8% 12.7%
Return on assets -65.8% 2.3% 5.4%
Return on invested capital – 6.7% 11.5%
Return on capital employed -77.9% 8.1% 11.8%
Asset turnover 0.1x 2.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 2.0x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 36.4% 0.2% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAIFFHUMPHG
Debt / assets – 25.5% 31.2%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – -2.7x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 7.5x 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 12.6% 66.3% 57.1%
Equity / assets 87.4% 33.7% 42.9%
Interest coverage – 3.8x 6.2x
Current ratio 4.9x 1.7x 1.3x
Quick ratio 4.5x 1.3x 0.7x
Cash ratio 4.4x 1.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -5.24 4.61 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAIFFHUMPHG
Dividend yield – 0.6% 3.7%
Net buyback yield -2.1% 0.3% -0.5%
Shareholder yield -2.1% 0.9% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAIFFHUMPHG
Forward P/E – 48.2xFY2026 13.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $8.65FY2026 $1.98FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -49.5%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +84.9% -10.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $166.70BFY2026 $21.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +28.6%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +7.6% -8.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAIFFHUMPHG
Held by institutions 7.9% 98.6% 5.4%
Institutions holding 23 927 363
Change in shares held, QoQ +34.3% +2.7% +0.8%
Institutions buying 10 558 266
Institutions selling 6 266 76
Buyers to sellers 1.67 2.10 3.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AIFFHUMPHG
AIFF 1.00 0.07 0.06
HUM 0.07 1.00 0.03
PHG 0.06 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AIFF, HUM and PHG?

Humana (HUM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Firefly Neuroscience (AIFF) $20.76M, Humana (HUM) $50.01B, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $25.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, AIFF, HUM and PHG?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Firefly Neuroscience (AIFF) -2.2x, Humana (HUM) 39.1x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is cheapest (Humana (HUM) 48.2x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Firefly Neuroscience (AIFF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Firefly Neuroscience (AIFF) +320.3%, Humana (HUM) +18.3%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest net margin (Firefly Neuroscience (AIFF) -524.5%, Humana (HUM) 0.9%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%). On return on invested capital, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads (Humana (HUM) 6.7%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 11.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Humana (HUM) returned the most: Firefly Neuroscience (AIFF) -54.8%, Humana (HUM) +43.5%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -7.9%. Over five years, Humana (HUM) compounded fastest (Firefly Neuroscience (AIFF) -61.1%/yr, Humana (HUM) -1.9%/yr, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -10.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (Firefly Neuroscience (AIFF) 160.0%, Humana (HUM) 48.1%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AIFF, HUM and PHG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.