AG vs NEWP Stock Comparison

First Majestic Silver and New Pacific Metals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

First Majestic Silver leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (First Majestic Silver 3, New Pacific Metals 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAGNEWPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.50B $1.02B AG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.6x -242.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +98.5% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.2% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.7% +151.1% NEWP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.4%/yr +8.2%/yr NEWP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.7% 80.4% AG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 76/100 58/100 AG

Percentile Scorecard

AGNEWP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAGNEWP
Valuation 75 #41 of 162 41 #96 of 162
Growth 99 #2 of 147 59 #61 of 147
Profitability 84 #20 of 122 –
Financial Health 69 #52 of 165 100 #1 of 165
Shareholder Returns 50 #54 of 107 31 #74 of 107
Overall 76 58
  • AG ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • NEWP ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAGNEWPSPY
1 month -21.9%-16.0% -0.8%
3 months -8.4%+20.1% +3.5%
6 months -27.5%+2.2% +7.0%
Year to date -10.9%+58.1% +12.2%
1 year +15.7%+151.1% +13.0%
3 years +171.0%+251.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +39.4%+52.1% +23.1%
5 years +12.5%+48.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +2.4%+8.2% +11.0%
10 years +85.9%+1,581.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +6.4%+32.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAGNEWPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.7%80.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 74.3%79.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.812.86 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.211.88 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.5%-78.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.6%-24.7% -1.8%
52-week high $32.01$7.37 $779.14
52-week low $10.67$2.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAGNEWP
P/E now vs peer median 20.5xmedian 12.8x -239.2xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 3.1x —median 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 15.2x -139.0xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.1x 6.4xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.42median 0.29 -10.23median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAGNEWP
Revenue $1.64B –
Gross profit $827.10M –
Operating income $756.62M –
Net income $421.54M -$4.19M
Free cash flow $617.41M -$7.39M
EPS (diluted) $0.72 $-0.02
Cash & equivalents $1.09B $38.57M
Total debt $1.03B –
Shares (diluted) 484.56M 180.60M
Enterprise value $3.56B $903.66M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAGNEWP
P/E 20.5x -239.2x
P/FCF 11.8x -139.0x
P/Operating cash flow 8.8x -294.2x
P/S 4.4x –
P/B 2.2x 6.4x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 6.4x
EV/EBITDA 6.4x –
EV/EBIT 8.4x –
EV/Revenue 3.9x –
EV/FCF 10.3x -133.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.7x -283.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.42 -10.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAGNEWP
Revenue growth (1Y) 98.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 39.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 335.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 283.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 622.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 78.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 517.9% -10.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 98.2% 19.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 294.7% -6.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.3% 23.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 207.8% -7.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 131.1% 14.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 232.3% -17.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 80.3% 33.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAGNEWP
Gross margin 50.4% –
EBITDA margin 60.3% –
Operating margin 46.1% –
Pretax margin 46.5% –
Net margin 21.2% –
FCF margin 37.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 50.3% –
Return on equity 12.2% -2.6%
Return on assets 8.4% –
Return on invested capital 12.0% –
Return on capital employed 17.5% –
Asset turnover 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAGNEWP
Debt / assets 6.1% –
Debt / equity 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.0x –
Debt / FCF 0.5x –
Liabilities / assets 31.7% 0.7%
Equity / assets 68.3% 99.3%
Interest coverage 34.3x –
Current ratio 2.6x 34.5x
Quick ratio 2.3x 34.3x
Cash ratio 2.2x 34.3x
Altman Z-score 3.75 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAGNEWP
Dividend yield 0.4% –
Net buyback yield -1.0% -2.9%
Shareholder yield -0.6% -2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 0.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 0.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -20.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -32.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAGNEWP
Forward P/E 18.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.81FY2026 $-0.03FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +76.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +17.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.58BFY2026 $0.00FY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +25.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +8.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAGNEWP
Held by institutions 47.0% –
Institutions holding 347 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.4% –
Institutions buying 193 –
Institutions selling 104 –
Buyers to sellers 1.86 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AGNEWP
AG 1.00 0.80
NEWP 0.80 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AG and NEWP?

First Majestic Silver (AG) is the largest by market capitalisation: First Majestic Silver (AG) $7.50B, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) $1.02B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year New Pacific Metals (NEWP) returned the most: First Majestic Silver (AG) +15.7%, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) +151.1%. Over five years, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) compounded fastest (First Majestic Silver (AG) +2.4%/yr, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) +8.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: First Majestic Silver (AG) 0.00%, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) 0.00%. New Pacific Metals (NEWP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, First Majestic Silver (AG) has been the steadiest (First Majestic Silver (AG) 73.7%, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) 80.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do AG and NEWP move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.80, a strong positive relationship. Holding both adds little diversification.

Which is the better stock, AG and NEWP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, First Majestic Silver (AG) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.