AFRM vs FCFS vs STNE Stock Comparison

Affirm Holdings, FirstCash Holdings and StoneCo Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.
$73.58 +4.0% 1M +2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$24.09B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
FCFS FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
$193.71 -7.9% 1M +22.2% 1Y
Market cap
$8.36B
P/E
20.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.29B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
4 wins
STNE StoneCo Ltd.
$7.64 -20.0% 1M -59.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.97B
P/E
2.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.73B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Affirm Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Affirm Holdings 4, FirstCash Holdings 4, StoneCo 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAFRMFCFSSTNELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.09B $8.36B $1.97B AFRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.5x 20.6x 2.8x STNE
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 39.3x 16.9x 4.2x STNE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.2% +22.9% +18.3% AFRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 45.3% 9.5% 26.2% AFRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.6% 8.7% — FCFS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 3.3x — AFRM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.4% +22.2% -59.8% FCFS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.5%/yr +17.4%/yr -24.8%/yr FCFS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.5% 36.8% 65.5% FCFS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 58/100 80/100 STNE

Percentile Scorecard

AFRMFCFSSTNE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAFRMFCFSSTNE
Valuation 32 #116 of 169 46 #92 of 169 96 #7 of 169
Growth 99 #3 of 159 78 #36 of 159 89 #19 of 159
Profitability 66 #51 of 146 76 #36 of 146 85 #23 of 146
Financial Health 58 #65 of 153 64 #56 of 153 33 #103 of 153
Shareholder Returns 13 #117 of 135 29 #96 of 135 99 #3 of 135
Overall 53 58 80
  • AFRM ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FCFS ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • STNE ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAFRMFCFSSTNESPY
1 month +4.0%-7.9%-20.0% -2.3%
3 months -2.7%-7.5%-32.7% -0.7%
6 months +9.7%-12.6%-29.5% +4.8%
Year to date -1.1%+21.5%-48.3% +10.3%
1 year +2.4%+22.2%-59.8% +10.3%
3 years +228.0%+77.6%-30.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year +48.6%+21.1%-11.3% +20.1%
5 years -54.3%+122.8%-76.0% +61.9%
5 years, per year -14.5%+17.4%-24.8% +10.1%
10 years —+320.2%— +258.6%
10 years, per year —+15.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAFRMFCFSSTNESPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.5%36.8%65.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.1%41.0%74.3% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.550.771.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.040.60-0.91 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.7%-31.0%-77.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.2%-18.1%-59.9% -3.5%
52-week high $85.78$236.43$19.04 $779.14
52-week low $42.53$148.05$7.64 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAFRMFCFSSTNE
P/E now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 11.7x 19.9xmedian 11.7x 3.0xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 2.7x 1.9xmedian 2.7x 0.9xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 36.0xmedian 13.1x 15.0xmedian 13.1x 0.8xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.4xmedian 6.5x 15.5xmedian 6.5x 2.9xmedian 6.5x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 0.7x 3.5xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.24median 0.33 0.87median 0.33 0.04median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAFRMFCFSSTNE
Revenue $4.26B $4.29B $2.73B
Gross profit – $2.15B $1.19B
Operating income $416.98M $553.59M $1.03B
Net income $1.93B $406.49M $584.68M
Free cash flow $992.63M $518.18M $842.18M
EPS (diluted) $5.53 $9.38 $2.62
Cash & equivalents $1.63B $203.16M $1.42B
Total debt $3.33B $2.45B –
Shares (diluted) 348.85M 43.34M 273.49M
Enterprise value $17.78B $7.73B -$3.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSTNE
P/E 13.0x 19.9x 3.0x
P/FCF 25.4x 15.5x 2.9x
P/Operating cash flow 20.5x 11.9x 3.2x
P/S 5.9x 1.9x 0.9x
P/B 4.6x 3.5x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 3.9x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 36.0x 15.0x 0.8x
EV/EBIT 64.6x 18.6x 0.9x
EV/Revenue 6.3x 2.4x 0.3x
EV/FCF 27.1x 19.9x 1.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.9x 15.2x 1.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.24 0.87 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSTNE
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.2% 22.9% 18.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 39.0% 12.0% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 23.3% 13.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 14.4% -16.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 577.8% 33.6% 1,432%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.9% 22.3% -3.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 3,598% 31.2% 86.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 58.2% 20.9% 51.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 3,515% 34.7% 89.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 54.1% 22.8% 84.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.1% 17.6% 415.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 365.8% 13.8% 22.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.0% 14.7% 249.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 123.3% 8.8% 16.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSTNE
Gross margin – 50.2% 43.7%
EBITDA margin 17.6% 16.0% 42.4%
Operating margin 9.8% 12.9% 37.5%
Pretax margin 11.6% 12.9% 19.8%
Net margin 45.3% 9.5% 26.2%
FCF margin 23.3% 12.1% 32.0%
Operating cash flow margin 28.9% 15.8% 28.5%
Return on equity 41.6% 17.7% 35.1%
Return on assets 13.3% 7.4% 6.4%
Return on invested capital 5.6% 8.7% –
Return on capital employed – 10.9% 28.7%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.8x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 1.7x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 7.2% 0.5% 1.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSTNE
Debt / assets 21.1% 44.0% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 1.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 3.3x –
Debt / FCF 3.4x 4.7x –
Liabilities / assets 65.3% 59.1% 84.4%
Equity / assets 34.7% 40.9% 15.6%
Interest coverage 0.9x 3.9x 1.2x
Current ratio – 4.8x 1.3x
Quick ratio – 0.5x 0.2x
Cash ratio – 0.5x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 3.41 1.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAFRMFCFSSTNE
Dividend yield – 0.9% 31.6%
Net buyback yield -0.6% 3.4% –
Shareholder yield -0.6% 4.3% 31.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAFRMFCFSSTNE
Forward P/E 39.3xFY2027 16.9xFY2026 4.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.87FY2027 $11.43FY2026 $1.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -66.2%FY2027 +30.5%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +44.4% +8.7% +15.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.23BFY2027 $4.25BFY2026 $2.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +22.7%FY2027 +16.2%FY2026 +14.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +24.0% +2.9% +4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAFRMFCFSSTNE
Held by institutions 77.1% 97.2% 59.4%
Institutions holding 659 501 273
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.1% +2.9% -7.6%
Institutions buying 402 254 148
Institutions selling 173 166 81
Buyers to sellers 2.32 1.53 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AFRMFCFSSTNE
AFRM 1.00 0.11 0.19
FCFS 0.11 1.00 0.08
STNE 0.19 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AFRM, FCFS and STNE?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) $24.09B, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) $8.36B, StoneCo (STNE) $1.97B.

Which stock is cheaper, AFRM, FCFS and STNE?

StoneCo (STNE) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 12.5x, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 20.6x, StoneCo (STNE) 2.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, StoneCo (STNE) is cheapest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 39.3x, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 16.9x, StoneCo (STNE) 4.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) +32.2%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +22.9%, StoneCo (STNE) +18.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) has the highest net margin (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 45.3%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 9.5%, StoneCo (STNE) 26.2%). On return on invested capital, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) leads (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 5.6%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 8.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) returned the most: Affirm Holdings (AFRM) +2.4%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +22.2%, StoneCo (STNE) -59.8%. Over five years, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) compounded fastest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -14.5%/yr, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +17.4%/yr, StoneCo (STNE) -24.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) has been the steadiest (Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 59.5%, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 36.8%, StoneCo (STNE) 65.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AFRM, FCFS and STNE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.